›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 637-646.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.03.004

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application scope of nonlinear Mohr-Coulomb criterion and its modification

LI Bin1, LIU Yan-zhang1, LIN Kun-feng2   

  1. 1. Hubei Key Laboratory for Efficient Utilization and Agglomeration of Metallurgic Mineral Resources, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430081, China; 2. Sinosteel Corporation Wuhan Safety and Environmental Protection Research Institute, Wuhan, Hubei 430081, China
  • Received:2015-03-16 Online:2016-03-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51074115) and Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2015CFA142).

Abstract: SINGH M proposed a nonlinear Mohr-Coulomb (M-C) criterion by adding a correction term to the original M-C criterion which could only linearly express rock strength variation with confining pressure. The nonlinear M-C criterion assumes that there is a critical state when the confining pressure reaches the uniaxial compressive strength of rock material, however it has a large discrepancy with some triaxial experimental results. In order to expand the application of the nonlinear M-C criterion, a general expression of M-C criterion is developed by further improving the correction term. A comparison among the general expression of M-C criterion, the nonlinear M-C criterion and the hyperbolic model is made by using triaxial data of 11 different kinds of rock. Analytical results show that the M-C criterion with the modified expression has a higher accuracy than the other two criteria. The strength values predicted by the generalized M-C criterion is consistent well with experimental values. Thus, the generalized M-C criterion has wider application than the nonlinear M-C criterion.

Key words: Mohr-Coulomb criterion, nonlinearity, modification, rock critical state, application scope, exponential criterion

CLC Number: 

  • TU 451

[1] ZHU Jian-feng, XU Ri-qing, LUO Zhan-you, PAN Bin-jie, RAO Chun-yi, . A nonlinear constitutive model for soft clay stabilized by magnesia cement considering the effect of solidified agent content [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2224-2232.
[2] YU Zhao-sheng, CHEN Xiao-bin, ZHANG Jia-sheng, DONG Liang, ABDOULKADER M S. Analysis of the nonlinearity of coefficient of earth pressure at rest and its calculation method for coarse-grained soils [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1923-1932.
[3] LI Jing-jing, KONG Ling-wei, . Creep properties of expansive soil under unloading stress and its nonlinear constitutive model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3465-3475.
[4] MA Qiu-feng, QIN Yue-ping, ZHOU Tian-bai, YANG Xiao-bin. Mechanical properties and constitutive model of porous rock under loading and unloading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2673-2685.
[5] LUO Bin-yu, YE Yi-cheng, CAO Zhong, WANG Qi-hu, LI Yu-fei, CHEN Hu, . Estimation of pillar strength and effect of inclination under gently inclined layered deposits based on Mohr-Coulomb criterion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1940-1946.
[6] LI Lin, LI Jing-pei, SUN De-an, GONG Wei-bing , . Nonlinear load-settlement analysis of pile groups considering pile installation effects [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 668-677.
[7] ZHANG Ling, CHEN Jin-hai, ZHAO Ming-hua. Maximum cantilever anti-slide piles spacing determination with consideration of soil arching effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(11): 4497-4505.
[8] LI Guo-wei, SHI Sai-jie, HOU Yu-zhou, WU Jian-tao, LI Feng, WU Shao-p, . Experimental study of development technology of non-expansive soil in Yangtze River to Huaihe River water diversion experimental project [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 302-314.
[9] LI Hai-li, ZHANG Chen-rong, LU Kai,. Nonlinear analysis of response of buried pipelines induced by tunneling [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 289-296.
[10] ZHANG De,LIU En-long,LIU Xing-yan,SONG Bing-tang, . Investigation on strength criterion for frozen silt soils [J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3237-3245.
[11] ZHU Jiao, XU Han-gang, CHEN Guo-xing, . Comparison of 1D equivalent-linear and nonlinear seismic site responses for quaternary deep sediment layers in Suzhou region [J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1479-1490.
[12] CHEN Song, QIAO Chun-sheng, YE Qing, DENG Bin. Composite damage constitutive model of rock mass with intermittent joints based on Mohr-Coulomb criterion [J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3612-3622.
[13] ZOU De-gao, LIU Suo, CHEN Kai, KONG Xian-jing, YU Xiang,. Static and dynamic analysis of seismic response nonlinearity for geotechnical engineering using quadtree mesh and polygon scaled boundary finite element method [J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 33-40.
[14] YANG Zi-han, YANG Xiao-li, XU Jing-shu, LI Yong-xin, SUN Zhi-bin,. Two methods for rock wall thickness calculation in karst tunnels based on upper bound theorem [J]. , 2017, 38(3): 801-809.
[15] CAO Wen-gui, YIN Peng, HE Min, LIU Tao. A combination method for predicting settlement based on new or old degree of data and adjustment of value interval of prediction [J]. , 2017, 38(2): 534-540.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!