Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 1797-1804.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0261

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Nonlinear distribution of active earth pressure on retaining wall considering wall-soil friction

RUI Rui, YE Yu-qiu, CHEN Cheng, TU Shu-jie   

  1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China
  • Received:2018-02-12 Online:2019-05-11 Published:2019-06-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51208403, 51708438); the Science and Technology Planning Project of Wuhan Urban Construction Commission(201639, 201802) and the Self-determined and Innovative Research Funds of Wuhan University of Technology (2017-TJ-B1-12).

Abstract: The magnitude and distribution of earth pressure against retaining wall is a common concern in the design of retaining wall. The distribution of earth pressure on a retaining wall normally presents nonlinear feature under the influence of boundary conditions, friction of wall back, etc. However, the accuracy of several current earth pressure calculation methods considering soil arching effect needs to be verified. In this paper, a series of 2D visual model tests were carried out on a self-developed apparatus measuring the earth pressure of the retaining wall, using test setup and analogical soil that was mixed with elliptical steel rods. The application of analogical soil in collaboration with loadometers to accurately measure the variation of earth pressure can reduce errors in the measurement of lateral pressure using the pressure cell. Two conditions include static condition and active translation model were considered in simulating and measuring the distribution of earth pressure. The results were compared with that of several theoretical methods. Due to impacts of the friction on retaining wall and soil arching effect, both the static and active earth pressure present nonlinear distribution. Meanwhile, the measured static earth pressure is less than theoretical value, while the measured active earth pressure is in good agreement with that of Paik’s method. Due to the influence of wall friction, the inclination angle of sliding surfaces is less than that of the theoretical value at the rupture surface. Moreover, inclination of stresses caused by the friction between wall induces the development of arch-shaped slip surfaces.

Key words: earth pressure, retaining wall, model test, soil arching effect, analogical soil

CLC Number: 

  • TU 473.1
[1] BAO Ning, WEI Jing, CHEN Jian-feng. Three dimensional discrete element analysis of soil arching in piled embankment [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[2] ZHANG Lei, HAI Wei-shen, GAN Hao, CAO Wei-ping, WANG Tie-hang, . Study on bearing behavior of flexible single pile subject to horizontal and uplift combined load [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[3] HUANG Wei, XIAO Wei-min, TIAN Meng-ting, ZHANG Lin-hao, . Model test research on the mechanical properties of irregular columnar jointed rock masses [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[4] CHEN Jian-gong, YANG Yang, CHEN Yan-han, CHEN Xiao-bing. Calculation of active earth pressure of cohesive soil behind retaining wall considering soil tensile strength [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1829-1835.
[5] ZOU Xin-jun, CAO Xiong, ZHOU Chang-lin, . Model study on the bearing behavior of V-H combined loaded pile in sand considering the current effects [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[6] CHENG Yong-hui, HU Sheng-gang, WANG Han-wu, ZHANG Cheng. Study on depth effect of pressuremeter feature parameters in deep buried sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[7] YU Zhao-sheng, CHEN Xiao-bin, ZHANG Jia-sheng, DONG Liang, ABDOULKADER M S. Analysis of the nonlinearity of coefficient of earth pressure at rest and its calculation method for coarse-grained soils [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1923-1932.
[8] NING Yi-bing, TANG Hui-ming, ZHANG Bo-cheng, SHEN Pei-wu, ZHANG Guang-cheng, XIA Ding, . Investigation of the rock similar material proportion based on orthogonal design and its application in base friction physical model tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2009-2020.
[9] PU He-fu, PAN You-fu, KHOTEJA Dibangar, ZHOU Yang. Model test on dewatering of high-water-content dredged slurry by flocculation-horizontal vacuum two-staged method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1502-1509.
[10] SHI Yong-yue, WANG Kui-hua, DONG Tian-wen, MA Xian-chun, HUANG Yong-wei. Study of key technologies of vacuum negative-pressure static pile load test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1699-1708.
[11] LIU Gong-xun, LI Wei, HONG Guo-jun, ZHANG Kun-yong, CHEN Xiu-han, SHI Shao-gang, RUTTEN Tom. Sandstone failure characteristics in large-scale cutting model tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[12] TANG Ming-gao, LI Song-lin, XU Qiang, GONG Zheng-feng, ZHU Quan, WEI Yong. Study of deformation characteristics of reservoir landslide based on centrifugal model test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[13] SONG Ding-bao, PU He-fu, CHEN Bao-guo, MENG Qing-da, . Model test on mechanical behavior of rigid load shedding culvert under high fill [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
[14] HOU Gong-yu, HU Tao, LI Zi-xiang, XIE Bing-bing, XIAO Hai-lin, ZHOU Tian-ci, . Experimental study on overburden deformation evolution under mining effect based on distributed fiber optical sensing technology [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 970-979.
[15] WANG Guo-hui, CHEN Wen-hua, NIE Qing-ke, CHEN Jun-hong, FAN Hui-hong, ZHANG Chuan, . Impacts of pit excavation on foundation piles in deep silty soil by centrifugal model tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!