Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 2284-2292.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0768

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Non-limit active earth pressure for retaining wall under translational motion

CHEN Jian-xu1, 2, SONG Wen-wu1   

  1. School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610039, China; 2. School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Xichang University, Xichang, Sichuan 615013, China
  • Received:2018-05-04 Online:2019-06-11 Published:2019-06-22
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Projects of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province(2016JY0187) and the Major Training Project of Education Department of Sichuan Province(14CZ0013).

Abstract: For inclined retaining walls under translational motion, the earth arch formed behind the wall is assumed arc-shaped. Nonlinear functions of displacement with internal and external friction angle, considering the interlayer shear stress, were established. The horizontal layer analysis method was used to obtain the solution of non-limit active earth pressure distribution, the total earth pressure, point of forces applied. The analytical solution and experimental values are in good agreement comparing to other methods. The results show that regardless of the inter-layer shear stress is considered or not, the magnitude of the earth pressure decreases as the wall displacement increases. The total of earth pressure does not change the magnitude but the distribution of earth pressure varies. The earth pressure considering the shear stress is less than the one in the upper part of the wall without considering the shear stress, and higher than the lower part. Shear stress acts as a hindrance to the soil, and it first increases significantly and then decreases slightly as the internal friction angle increases. Shear stress increases as the external friction angle and displacement increase. With the increase of the wall dorsal obliquity, the shear stress decreases first, then increases in the opposite direction, and the earth pressure increases accordingly. The height of the resultant force point considering the soil arching and shear stress together is between only considering the soil arching effect and the Coulomb solution.

Key words: mode of translation, non-limit active earth pressure, soil arch, displacement, shear stress, horizontal layer analysis

CLC Number: 

  • TU432
[1] ZHAO Jiu-bin, LIU Yuan-xue, HE Shao-qi, YANG Jun-tang, BAI Zhun, . Mathematical statistical model of horizontal displacement and rainfall of step deformation landslide in Three Gorges reservoir area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 305-311.
[2] BAO Ning, WEI Jing, CHEN Jian-feng. Three dimensional discrete element analysis of soil arching in piled embankment [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[3] WANG Li-an, ZHAO Jian-chang, YU Yun-yan, . Propagation characteristics of Rayleigh wave in non-homogeneous saturated foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1983-1990.
[4] HUANG Fu-yun, CHEN Han-lun, DONG Rui, SHAN Yu-lin. Experimental study of single pile-soil interaction under horizontal low-cycle reciprocating displacement [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1625-1634.
[5] TIAN Shu-ping, GAO Meng, WANG Ying, CHEN Qing-sheng. Numerical analysis and field experiment on vibration isolation for Duxseal [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1770-1780.
[6] SONG Ding-bao, PU He-fu, CHEN Bao-guo, MENG Qing-da, . Model test on mechanical behavior of rigid load shedding culvert under high fill [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
[7] BI Zong-qi, GONG Quan-mei, ZHOU Shun-hua, CHENG Qian, . Experimental study of the evolution law of vertical soil arch under cyclic loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 886-894.
[8] SONG Yi-min, ZHANG Yue, XU Hai-liang, WANG Ya-fei, HE Zhi-jie. Study on creep-slip and stick-slip deformation evolution of rock based on non-uniform characteristics [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 363-371.
[9] HUANG Yu-hua, XU Lin-rong, ZHOU Jun-jie, CAI Yu, . Calculation of pile-soil stress in pile-net composite foundation based on improved Terzarghi method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 667-675.
[10] DENG Tao, LIN Cong-yu, LIU Zhi-peng, HUANG Ming, CHEN Wen-jing, . A simplified elastoplastic method for laterally loaded single pile with large displacement [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 95-102.
[11] WANG Zhong-kai, XU Guang-li. Influence range and quantitative prediction of surface deformation during shield tunnelling and exiting stages [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 285-294.
[12] WANG Ti-qiang, WANG Yong-zhi, YUAN Xiao-ming, TANG Zhao-guang, WANG Hai, DUAN Xue-feng. Reliability analysis of acceleration integral displacement method based on shaking table tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 565-573.
[13] KONG Liang, LIU Wen-zhuo, YUAN Qing-meng, DONG Tong, . Triaxial tests on gassy sandy soil under constant shear stress paths [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3319-3326.
[14] WU Shuang-shuang, HU Xin-li, ZHANG Han, ZHOU Chang, GONG Hui, . Field test and calculation method of negative skin friction of rock-socketed piles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3610-3617.
[15] DENG Mao-lin, YI Qing-lin, HAN Bei, ZHOU Jian, LI Zhuo-jun, ZHANG Fu-ling, . Analysis of surface deformation law of Muyubao landslide in Three Gorges reservoir area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3145-3152.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!