Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 3291-3299.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1289

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research •     Next Articles

Anisotropic characteristics and shear mechanical properties of different genetic structural planes

PENG Shou-jian1, 2, YUE Yu-qing1, 2, LIU Yi-xin1, 2, XU Jiang1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China; 2. State and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Methane Drainage in Complex Coal Gas Seam, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)
  • Received:2018-07-18 Online:2019-09-10 Published:2019-09-03
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51474040), the Basic and Frontier Research Projects of Chongqing (cstc2018jcyjA3145) and the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities (106112017CDJQJ248825).

Abstract: The structural plane of rock mass shows obvious anisotropy, which directly influences the deformation characteristics, mechanical properties and seepage characteristics of rock mass. It is significant to conduct the anisotropic quantitative analysis of the structure surface. In this paper, the anisotropy characteristics of different genetic structure planes are analyzed by the common structural surface quantization parameters (joint roughness coefficient JRC, the average joint angle θ, and fractal dimension DB), and their influences on the shear mechanical properties are also studied. The results show that in the tensile structure plane, the values of JRC and θ along the direction of splitting are larger than the values of these parameters perpendicular to the splitting direction and fluctuated slightly with the change of the angle. DB fluctuated largely in the diagonal direction, and its value is related to profile length. In shear structure plane, the values of JRC and θ parallel to the splitting direction have no significant differences from those perpendicular to the splitting direction. However, DB changes greatly in the diagonal direction. When θ and DB are used to evaluate the anisotropy of the structure plane, there is no obvious difference in anisotropy coefficients of splitting fracture plane and shear fracture plane. While, when JRC is used as evaluation parameter, the anisotropy coefficient is quite different, which could better reflect the different characteristics of different structural planes. The peak shear load and normal displacement of shear fracture plane are higher than those of splitting structure plane. The shear displacements of the two structural planes are similar when the dilation angle reached the peak value, and the aperture distribution of shear fracture structural plane is relatively concentrated and generally larger. The aperture distribution splitting fracture plane is more dispersed.

Key words: structure plane, splitting, shear, anisotropy, mechanical characteristics

CLC Number: 

  • TU 452
[1] LUO Bin-yu, YE Yi-cheng, HU Nan-yan, LI Peng-cheng, CHEN Chang-zhao, . Mohr’s circle analysis and numerical simulation of stress state of pillar under combined compression-shear loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 63-73.
[2] GUI Yue, WU Cheng-kun, ZHAO Zhen-xing, LIU Sheng-jun, LIU Rui, ZHANG Qiu-min. Effects of microbial decomposition of organic matter on engineering properties of peat soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 147-155.
[3] LIU Jie, YANG Yu-hua, YAO Hai-lin, LU Zheng, YUE Chan, . Experimental study on treatment of dispersive clay based on different modification methods [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 163-170.
[4] XU Ri-qing, CHENG Kang, YING Hong-wei, LIN Cun-gang, LIANG Rong-zhu, FENG Su-yang, . Deformation response of a tunnel under foundation pit unloading considering buried depth and shearing effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 195-207.
[5] ZOU Xian-jian, WANG Yi-teng , WANG Chuan-ying, . Three-dimensional morphological feature of rock structural surfaces and dominant anti-slip direction using the borehole images [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 290-298.
[6] ZHOU Yue-feng, YANG Zhe, RAO Xi-bao, XIAO Guo-qiang, ZHOU Li-ming, . Bending-extension element experiment to obtain elastic parameters of clay under different moisture contents [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 387-393.
[7] XU Cheng-shun, DOU Peng-fei, DU Xiu-li, CHEN Su, HAN Jun-yan, . Study on solid-liquid phase transition characteristics of saturated sand based on large shaking table test on free field [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2189-2198.
[8] CHEN Hao, HU Xiao-rong. Triple-shear failure criteria and experimental verification for unsaturated soils [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2380-2388.
[9] BAI Xue-yuan, WANG Xue-bin, SHU Qin, . Continuum-discontinuum simulation of effects of internal friction angle on local fracture of circular cavern surrounding rock under hydrostatic pressure [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2485-2493.
[10] YU Lu, YANG Qing, YANG Gang, ZHANG Jin-li. Analysis of the resistance of elliptical tip of torpedo anchor by plastic limit analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1953-1962.
[11] LIANG Ke, CHEN Guo-xing, HANG Tian-zhu, LIU Kang, HE Yang, . A new prediction model of small-strain shear modulus of sandy soils [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1963-1970.
[12] HONG Chen-jie, HUANG Man, XIA Cai-chu, LUO Zhan-you, DU Shi-gui, . Study of size effect on the anisotropic variation coefficient of rock joints [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2098-2109.
[13] LIU Hai-feng, ZHU Chang-qi, WANG Ren, WANG Xin-zhi, CUI Xiang, WANG Tian-min, . Shear test on reef limestone-concrete bonding interface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1540-1548.
[14] LIU Jian-min, QIU Yue, GUO Ting-ting, SONG Wen-zhi, GU Chuan, . Comparative experimental study on static shear strength and postcyclic strength of saturated silty clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[15] XU Jie, ZHOU Jian, LUO Ling-hui, YU Liang-gui, . Study on anisotropic permeability model for mixed kaolin-montmorillonite clays [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 469-476.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!