Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 3363-3372.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1011

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Physical model experiments of dynamic interaction between debris flow and bridge pier model

WANG Dong-po1, 2, CHEN Zheng2, 3, HE Si-ming2, 3, CHEN Ke-jian4, LIU Fa-ming4, LI Ming-qing4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface Process, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China; 3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 4. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China)
  • Received:2018-06-11 Online:2019-09-10 Published:2019-09-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC1501003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41790433, 41877266) and the Science and Technology Project of Sichuan Education Department (18ZA0043).

Abstract: The debris flows are recognised as a major threat to bridge piers located in mountainous gullies, especially in the areas of the active seismological and hydrologic region in Southwest China. It is important to build the dynamic evolution model and quantitatively describe the dynamic process of debris flow impacting bridge pier. In this study, all of the large-scale laboratory tests are conducted by using large multi-functional debris-flow simulation system. The main objectives of our experiments are to find the correlation between impacting pressures and variable factors including velocity, flow depth, and dimensionless characteristic parameters of fluid mechanics and to obtain the dynamic behaviour of bridge pier under the impact of debris flow. The experimental results and dimensionless analysis show that the dynamic process is mainly controlled by two dimensionless numbers of Froude number (Fr) and Reynolds number (Re). Generally, the dimensionless impact pressure is the function of Fr for the low-viscosity debris flows, while for the high-viscosity debris flows, it is the function of both Re and Fr. Different types of debris flows present significant differences in both the peak impacting pressure and impacting power spectrum. Under the same bulk density, the low-viscosity debris flow has greater impact energy than that of the high-viscosity debris flow. In addition, various types of debris flows are essentially distinguished by the critical Fr line. To provide technical support and scientific basis, we analysed the impact signals of different types of debris flows and discussed the mechanism of impact model.

Key words: debris flows, bridge pier, impact, physical model experiment

CLC Number: 

  • TU 457
[1] YE Yang, ZENG Ya wu, DU Xin, SUN Han qing, CHEN Xi, . Three-dimensional discrete element simulation of spherical gravel collision damag [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 368-378.
[2] LIU Xin-yu, ZHANG Xian-wei, YUE Hao-zhen, KONG Ling-wei, XU Chao, . SHPB tests on dynamic impact behavior of granite residual soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2001-2008.
[3] XU Dong-sheng, HUANG Ming, HUANG Fo-guang, CHEN Cheng. Failure behavior of cemented coral sand with different gradations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1531-1539.
[4] ZHOU En-quan, ZONG Zhi-xin, WANG Qiong, LU Jian-fei, ZUO Xi. Dynamic characteristics of pipe buried in rubber-silt lightweight mixtures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1388-1395.
[5] WANG Qing-yuan, LIU Jie, WANG Pei-tao, LIU Fei, . 冲击扰动诱发蠕变岩石加速失稳破坏试验 [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 781-788.
[6] LIU Xi-ling, LIU Zhou, LI Xi-bing, HAN Meng-si. Acoustic emission b-values of limestone under uniaxial compression and Brazilian splitting loads [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 267-274.
[7] WANG You-biao, YAO Chang-rong, LIU Sai-zhi, LI Ya-dong, ZHANG Xun. Experimental study of debris flow impact forces on bridge piers [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 616-623.
[8] XIAO Si-you, SU Li-jun, JIANG Yuan-jun, LI Cheng, LIU Zhen-yu, . Influence of slope angle on mechanical properties of dry granular flow impacting vertical retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(11): 4341-4351.
[9] WEI Jiu-qi, LÜ Ya-ru, LIU Guo-quan, ZHANG Lei, LI Lei , . One-dimensional impact responses and energy absorption of calcareous sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 191-198.
[10] HU Jie, LI Shu-cai, SHI Shao-shuai, LI Li-ping, LIU Jin-pei, LIU Hong-liang, HE Peng. Model test study of rockfall impacts on tunnel heading slope and discussion of related mechanisms [J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2527-2536.
[11] WANG Chun, TANG Li-zhong, CHENG Lu-ping, CHEN Yuan, LIU Tao, WEI Yong-heng, . Dynamic characteristics of skarn subjected to frequent dynamic disturbance under combined action of high axial compression and confining pressure [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(12): 4537-4546.
[12] PEI Shu-feng, FENG Xia-ting, ZHANG Jian-cong, WANG Peng-fei, JIANG Quan,ZHOU Yang-yi, HAO Xian-jie, LIU Jun-feng,. Time-dependent relaxation characteristics of columnar jointed basalts in high-slope dam foundation during excavation [J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3743-3754.
[13] RUAN Yong-fen, WANG Xi-dong, LI Zhi-wei, LIU Ke-wen,. Theoretical analysis of spherical cavity expansion of axial loading capacity for toothed piles with sand liner [J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2567-2573.
[14] PENG Dong, CHE Ai-lan, FENG Shao-kong, WANG Huan,. An impact imaging method for defect detection and its application in geotechnical engineering [J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2764-2772.
[15] WANG Hao-yu, XU Jin-yu, WANG Peng, LIU Shi, LIU Shao-he,. Mechanical properties and energy mechanism of red sandstone under hydro-dynamic coupling effect [J]. , 2016, 37(10): 2861-2868.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!