岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 3219-3233.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1446CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1446

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

同采工作面厚硬顶板破断诱冲机制及防控技术

徐东1, 2,高明仕2, 3,郑锐1   

  1. 1.河北工程大学 矿业与测绘工程学院,河北 邯郸 056038;2.中国矿业大学 冲击岩爆巷道支护研究中心,江苏 徐州 221116; 3.中国矿业大学 矿业工程学院,江苏 徐州 221116
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-21 接受日期:2024-12-15 出版日期:2025-10-11 发布日期:2025-10-13
  • 通讯作者: 高明仕,男,1970年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事巷道支护、冲击地压岩爆灾害防治方面的研究。E-mail: cumt_gms@163.com
  • 作者简介:徐东,男,1992年生,博士,讲师,主要从事巷道围岩动力灾害防治方向的研究工作。E-mail: cumtxudong@cumt.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    河北省自然科学基金(No.E2025402059);河北工程大学创新基金项目(No.SJ2401002062)

Mechanism and control technology of rock burst induced by thick and hard roof breaking in simultaneous mining working face

XU Dong1, 2, GAO Ming-shi2, 3, ZHENG Rui1   

  1. 1. School of Mining and Geomatics Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, Hebei 056038, China; 2. Institute of Rock Burst Roadway Support Research, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 3. School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China
  • Received:2024-11-21 Accepted:2024-12-15 Online:2025-10-11 Published:2025-10-13
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (E2025402059) and the Innovation Foundation Project of Hebei University of Engineering (SJ2401002062).

摘要: 针对两工作面同采,造成端头区域顶板破碎、围岩动力显现严重等问题,通过研究不同层位厚硬顶板破断结构特征,建立了厚硬顶板破断力学模型,揭示了同采工作面厚硬顶板破断诱冲机制,分析了工作面覆岩静动载应力演化特征,提出了厚硬顶板工作面井上下协同压裂与顶板锚-注补强加固成层式支护“卸-固”协同防冲控制技术。研究表明:厚硬顶板易形成矿井冲击震源层,其破断释能具有远近场效应及区域致灾特征,造成矿井不同冲击动力显现;厚硬顶板破断释能与其强度、厚度、赋存层位、上覆岩层荷载以及采空区临界跨度等因素有关,两工作面同采采空区临界跨度增大,厚硬顶板破断释能增大,位于近采空区侧的高位厚硬顶板断裂线形成矿井诱冲关键震源点;采空区侧中低位厚硬悬臂梁结构造成工作面端头走向30~40 m、倾向70~80 m区域形成高静载三角应力集中区,叠合高位厚硬顶板破断强动载影响,引起工作面端头区域40 m范围直接顶和亚关键层1破碎,极易出现冒顶事故;井上下协同压裂防冲控制技术,可破坏高位冲击震源层,切断井下中低位厚硬悬臂梁,降低端头区域围岩静动载应力响应,深浅孔围岩注浆固化与锚注三阶协同支护成层式预应力支护壳,可提高端头区域破碎顶板强度及完整性,增强围岩抗冲性能。现场采用“卸-固”协同防冲技术,围岩应力降低了19.2%~20.4%,变形量降低了74.0%~77.2%,支架压力降低了24.2%,顶板动载扰动减弱,围岩塑性区减小,采场围岩稳定性显著提升。

关键词: 冲击地压, 厚硬顶板, 同采工作面, 协同防冲, 应力波

Abstract: In view of the problems of broken roof in the end area and severe dynamic manifestation of surrounding rock caused by simultaneous mining of two working faces, this study examines the fracture structure characteristics of thick and hard roof in different layers. It establishes a fracture mechanics model for thick and hard roof, reveals the mechanism of rock burst induced by thick and hard roof breaking in the simultaneous mining working face, and analyzes the evolution characteristics of static and dynamic load stresses in the overlying strata. A collaborative fracturing technique for thick and hard roof working faces and a layered support system with anchor injection reinforcement, known as the “unloading-solidification” collaborative anti impact control technology, are proposed. Research has shown that thick and hard roofs tend to form a seismic source layer for mine impacts, and their fracture energy release has near-far field effects and regional disaster characteristics, leading to different impact dynamics in mines. The energy released by the fracture of thick and hard roof is related to factors including strength, thickness, occurrence layer, overlying rock load, and critical span of the goaf. As the critical span of the goaf increases, the energy released by the fracture of thick and hard roof also increases. The fracture line of the high-level thick and hard roof located on the side near the goaf is a key shock source point for mine induced rockburst. The middle and low thick and hard cantilever beam structure on the goaf side causes the end of the working face to strike 30–40 m and incline 70–80 m, forming a high static load triangular stress concentration area. The superimposed high-level thick and hard roof breaks and is significantly affected by dynamic loads, resulting in crack development on the immediate roof and sub-critical layer 1 roof within 40 m of the end of the working face, increasing the risk of roof collapse accidents. By adopting the collaborative fracturing and anti-impact control technology for upper and lower wells, the high-level shock source layer can be destroyed, the underground middle and low thick and hard cantilever beam can be severed, and the static and dynamic stress response of surrounding rock in the end area can be reduced. Deep and shallow hole grouting solidification and three-stage collaborative anchoring support can form a layered prestressed support shell, improving the strength and integrity of the fractured roof in the end area and enhancing the anti-impact performance of surrounding rock. On-site implementation of the “unloading-solidification” collaborative anti-impact measures results in a 19.2%–20.4% reduction in surrounding rock stress, a 74.0%–77.2% reduction in deformation, a 24.2% reduction in support pressure, decreases dynamic load disturbance on the roof, reduces plastic zone of the surrounding rock, and significantly improves the stability of the surrounding rock in the mining area.

Key words: rock burst, thick and hard roof, simultaneous mining working face, collaborative anti-impact, stress wave

中图分类号: TD 353
[1] 许明, 袁帮国, 蔡宇, 刘先珊, 甘峰帆, 袁东豪, . 应力波扰动下岩石节理端部应力集中特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1687-1699.
[2] 谭健, 刘学生, 耿艳峰, 付彪, 王洪磊, 许珂, . 防冲钻机钻测智能化试验平台研制及初步应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 673-684.
[3] 李利萍, 胡学锦, 潘一山, 李明会, . 煤的冲击倾向性对深部煤岩界面超低摩擦效应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1633-1642.
[4] 高明仕, 俞鑫, 徐东, 贺永亮, 赵世帆, . 基于冲能吸能平衡效应的冲击地压巷道分级支护研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 38-48.
[5] 刘文俊, 李岳, 蔡靖, 戴轩, 水伟厚, 董炳寅, . 基于强夯应力波传播模型的夯击参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 427-435.
[6] 金解放, 张雅晨, 刘康, 张睿, 李云浩, . 梯度应力对红砂岩应力波传播特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 952-964.
[7] 王书文, 鞠文君, 张春会, 苏士杰, 陆闯, . 弹脆性圆形煤巷应力跃升及冲击地压预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 873-883.
[8] 王凯兴, 薛佳琪, 潘一山, 窦林名, 肖永惠, . 顶板−支护系统准共振诱发冲击地压机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 717-727.
[9] 陈光波, 张俊文, 贺永亮, 张国华, 李谭, . 煤岩组合体峰前能量分布公式推导及试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 130-143.
[10] 柴少波, 周涛, 田威, 井彦林, 史杰辉. 考虑岩体应力的结构面中应力波传播特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 184-192.
[11] 常聚才, 齐潮, 殷志强, 史文豹, 贺凯, 吴昊原, . 动载作用下端锚锚固体力学响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3294-3304.
[12] 杨 科, 刘文杰, 马衍坤, 许日杰, 池小楼, . 真三轴单面临空下煤岩组合体冲击 破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 15-27.
[13] 刘鑫, 许宏发, 范鹏贤, 耿汉生, 莫家权, 王德荣. 围压下岩石填充裂隙对应力波衰减规律的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2099-2108.
[14] 吴振华, 潘鹏志, 潘俊锋, 王兆丰, 高家明. 地堑构造区冲击地压发生机制及矿震活动规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2225-2238.
[15] 王爱文, 高乾书, 潘一山, . 煤层钻孔降倾-控变-耗能防冲机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1230-1244.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!