岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12): 3869-3884.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1597CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1597

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于响应面法的坚硬顶板弹性岩梁内力与变形的敏感性分析

侯公羽1,刘云峰1, 2,周光一1,于续楠1,邵耀华1,赵铁林1, 3   

  1. 1. 中国矿业大学(北京) 力学与土木工程学院,北京 100083;2. 华电煤业集团有限公司,北京 100031; 3. 中煤科工开采研究院有限公司,北京 100013
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-26 接受日期:2025-01-17 出版日期:2025-12-11 发布日期:2025-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 周光一,男,2000年生,硕士研究生,主要从事地下空间工程方面的研究。E-mail: zhou2357@foxmail.com
  • 作者简介:侯公羽,男,1965年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程、岩石力学方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: hgyht@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金委员会与2020年度高速铁路基础研究联合基金资助重点项目(No.U2034205)。

Sensitivity analysis of internal force and deformation of elastic rock beam with hard roof based on response surface method

HOU Gong-yu1, LIU Yun-feng1, 2, ZHOU Guang-yi1, YU Xu-nan1, SHAO Yao-hua1, ZHAO Tie-lin1, 3   

  1. 1. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2. Huadian Coal Industry Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100031, China; 3. CCTEG Coal Mining Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China
  • Received:2024-12-26 Accepted:2025-01-17 Online:2025-12-11 Published:2025-12-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation and 2020 High-Speed Railway Basic Research Joint Fund (U2034205).

摘要: 为掌握煤层开采过程中坚硬顶板的变形及内力分布规律,并探究关键参数对坚硬顶板力学响应的敏感性,首先,将煤层和直接顶视为弹性地基,选取工作面中部单位宽度岩梁作为研究对象。然后,根据弹性地基梁和关键层理论,建立基本顶弹性基础梁模型,得到初次破断前顶板挠度变形、弯矩和剪力解析解,分析了弹性模量、煤层和直接顶刚度、上覆软弱岩层厚度、超前支承压力影响范围和基本顶厚度等5个关键参数对顶板挠度变形、弯矩和剪力的影响。最后,采用Design-Expert软件,设计了五因素三水平响应面试验方案,开展了单因素及交互因素作用对坚硬顶板力学特征的敏感性分析。结果表明:(1)煤层和直接顶刚度对顶板整体变形具有显著影响,其他因素主要影响采空区顶板;此外,上覆软弱岩层厚度的增加会导致顶板挠度变形的增大,其他因素则相反。(2)上覆软弱岩层厚度呈线性增加时,采空区顶板弯矩和剪力亦线性增长;超前支承压力影响范围和基本顶厚度对工作面前方顶板弯矩和剪力影响显著,而弹性模量、煤层和直接顶刚度对弯矩和剪力几乎无影响。(3)上覆软弱岩层厚度、超前支承压力影响范围和基本顶厚度等决定结构几何特性和荷载分布的因素对岩梁挠度变形和内力的影响,普遍大于弹性模量、煤层和直接顶刚度等岩体力学属性带来的影响。模型考虑了煤层开采过程中上部荷载的动态变化,为研究煤矿开采过程中基本顶的变形和内力分布提供了理论基础。

关键词: 基本顶, 弹性地基梁, 初次来压, 响应面法, 敏感性分析

Abstract: To characterize the deformation and internal force distribution of the hard roof during coal seam mining and to assess the sensitivity of key parameters on its mechanical response, we model the coal seam and the immediate roof as an elastic foundation and select a unit width rock beam at the center of the working face as the research object. Based on the theory of elastic foundation beams and key strata, we establish an elastic foundation beam model for the main roof and obtain analytical solutions for roof deflection, bending moment, and shear force prior to initial fracture. We analyze the influence of five key parameters—the elastic modulus; the stiffness of the coal seam and the immediate roof; the thickness of the overlying soft-rock strata; the influence range of the advanced abutment pressure; and the main-roof thickness—on roof deflection, bending moment, and shear force Finally, using Design-Expert software, we design a five factor, three level response surface scheme and perform a sensitivity analysis of single factors and factor interactions on the hard roof’s mechanical characteristics. Results show that (1) the stiffness of the coal seam and the immediate roof significantly affect the overall roof deformation, while other factors primarily influence the goaf roof. Additionally, increasing the thickness of the overlying soft-rock strata increases roof deflection, whereas other factors have the opposite effect. (2) If the thickness of the overlying soft-rock strata increases linearly, the goaf roof bending moment and shear force also increase linearly. The influence range of the advanced abutment pressure and the main-roof thickness significantly affect the bending moment and shear force in the roof in front of the working face, whereas the elastic modulus and the stiffness of the coal seam and the immediate roof have little to no effect. (3) Factors governing geometric characteristics and load distribution—such as the thickness of the overlying soft-rock strata, the influence range of the advanced abutment pressure, and the main-roof thickness—generally have a greater effect on rock-beam deflection and internal forces than the mechanical properties of the rock mass (e.g., elastic modulus and the stiffness of the coal seam and the immediate roof). The model accounts for the dynamic variation of the upper load during coal-seam mining, providing a theoretical basis for studying the deformation and internal-force distribution of the main roof throughout mining.

Key words: main roof, elastic foundation beam, first periodic weighting, response surface method, sensitivity analysis

中图分类号: TU452
[1] 段书苏, 候志强, 王志佳, 胡俊, 张友良, 张建经. D-山梨醇对微生物诱导碳酸钙沉积作用效果及加固红黏土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 238-248.
[2] 赖丰文, 刘松玉, 蔡国军, 鲁泰山, 李洪江, 段伟, . 基于孔压静力触探原位测试的基坑围护结构变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2650-2660.
[3] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[4] 冯世进, 徐熠, 杨俊毅, 郑奇腾, 张晓磊, . 基于集对-组合赋权的填埋场失稳风险评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2129-2139.
[5] 黄佳佳, 蒋明镜, 王华宁, . 中国南海神狐海域水合物储层井壁稳定可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1505-1516.
[6] 曹建军, 胡斌, 王泽祺, 李京, . 基于分数阶积分的软弱夹层蠕变损伤模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 454-464.
[7] 马纪元, 程国强, 李霞颖, 杨凌雪, 李琦, 马晶, 陈博文, 杨川枫, 张瑶, 李凤洋, 余涛, 虎亭, 许宗红, 钟屹岩, . CO2多层注入下盖层密闭性影响因素研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3447-3460.
[8] 李翔, 王靖童, 魏恒. 多失效模式下基于区间非概率的岩质隧道稳定可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2409-2418.
[9] 钟小春, 黄思远, 槐荣国, 朱诚, 胡一康, 陈旭泉, . 基于浆液浮力试验的盾尾管片纵向上浮特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1615-1624.
[10] 陈勇, 苏剑, 曹玲, 王力, 王世梅, . 基于数据挖掘的土−水特征曲线演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 23-34.
[11] 周兵红. 一种预测砂土土-水特征曲线的简化方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 222-228.
[12] 刘小虎, 姚直书, 程桦, 查文华, 吴捷豪, . 深井穿尖交岔点突变失稳机制分析及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 521-531.
[13] 王祖贤, 施成华, 刘建文. 非对称推力作用下盾构隧道附加响应的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2449-2460.
[14] 李志浩, 肖世国. 不同运动模式的悬臂式挡墙地震永久位移算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 723-734.
[15] 李春元, 左建平, 张勇, . 深部开采底板破坏与基本顶岩梁初次垮断的 联动效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3301-3314.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!