岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 255-266.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0141CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0141

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

注浆影响下隧道渗流场及最小覆土厚度修正研究

贾宝新,袁庆雷   

  1. 辽宁工程技术大学 土木工程学院,辽宁 阜新 123000
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-11 接受日期:2025-04-28 出版日期:2026-01-11 发布日期:2026-01-08
  • 通讯作者: 袁庆雷,男,1999年生,硕士,主要从事地下工程与隧道工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: 15612712713@163.com
  • 作者简介:贾宝新,男,1978年生,博士,教授,主要从事矿山灾害力学与地下工程防灾减灾方面的研究。E-mail: jbx_811010@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    辽宁工程技术大学学科创新团队资助项目(No. LNTU20TD08)

Correction of tunnel seepage field and the minimum overburden thickness under the influence of grouting

JIA Bao-xin, YUAN Qing-lei   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, Liaoning 123000, China
  • Received:2025-02-11 Accepted:2025-04-28 Online:2026-01-11 Published:2026-01-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Project of Innovation Team of Liaoning Technical University (LNTU20TD08).

摘要: 隧道最小覆土厚度是水下隧道施工中的关键参数。为了计算考虑注浆影响的隧道最小覆土厚度,基于镜像法和渗流力学理论,推导了水下隧道渗流场在注浆影响下的解析解,并结合日本最小渗流法对隧道最小覆土厚度的计算进行修正。通过公式退化和室内相似模拟试验,验证了理论解析解的正确性。基于此解,探讨了注浆相对渗透系数、注浆范围、水深等参数对解的影响。研究表明:在不同埋深比条件下,衬砌外水压力随水深增加呈线性增长;埋深比越小,水深变化对衬砌外水压力的敏感性越高;提高注浆圈的抗渗性比单纯增大其注浆范围更能有效降低隧道渗流量,特别是在1~3 m注浆范围内控制效果尤为显著;未实施注浆时,隧道覆土厚度对水深变化更为敏感,提升注浆材料抗渗性可有效减少水深的影响;对于高风险隧道,建议采用高抗渗性注浆材料,注浆厚度可扩展至5 m以上。而常规工程中,1~3 m的注浆范围为优选,以实现安全性与成本的平衡。

关键词: 隧道工程, 渗流场, 覆土厚度, 注浆圈, 室内模型试验

Abstract: The minimum tunnel overburden thickness is a critical parameter in underwater tunnel construction. To calculate the minimum tunnel overburden thickness considering the influence of grouting, an analytical solution for the seepage field of an underwater tunnel influenced by grouting is derived using the mirror method and seepage mechanics theory. The solution is refined using the Japanese minimum seepage method. The accuracy of the theoretical solution is verified through formula simplification and laboratory simulation tests. Using this solution, this paper investigates the influence of parameters including the relative permeability coefficient of grouting, grouting range, and water depth. The findings show that, at different depth ratios, water pressure outside the tunnel lining increases linearly with head height. A lower depth ratio increases the sensitivity of external water pressure to water depth variations. Improving the permeability of the grouting ring reduces tunnel seepage more effectively than enlarging the grouting range, especially within a range of 1 m to 3 m, where the effect is most pronounced. In the absence of grouting, the tunnel overburden thickness is highly sensitive to changes in water depth, and enhancing the permeability of the grouting material can significantly mitigate the impact of water depth. For high-risk tunnels, high-permeability grouting materials with a thickness exceeding 5 m are recommended. In conventional projects, a grouting range of 1–3 m provides an optimal balance between safety and cost.

Key words: tunneling, seepage field, overburden thickness, grouting ring, indoor model tests

中图分类号: TU 459.5
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 江学辉, 颜建伟, 罗文俊, 李佳宝, 徐长节. 纵向压力和加固钢板对隧道力学性能影响的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1623-1632.
[3] 张佳威, 崔臻, 张翔宇, 曹俊, . 高地应力环境下跨活断层隧道抗错断铰接设计试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3333-3344.
[4] 周晓敏, 马文著, 张松, 宋宜祥, 刘勇, 和晓楠, . 渗流条件下隧道锚注复合围岩体的解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 206-220.
[5] 孙闯, 兰思琦, 陶琦, 关喜彬, 韩希平, . 深埋隧道软弱围岩拱顶三维渐进性塌落机制上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2471-2484.
[6] 季雨坤, 王钦科, 赵国良, 张健, 马建林, . 斜坡上嵌岩抗拔桩竖向承载变形特性模型试验及数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1604-1614.
[7] 张硕成, 陈文化. 考虑不均匀冻胀土体-衬砌隧道在寒区的振动响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1467-1476.
[8] 周翔, 蔡静森, 马伟成, 肖皓文, . 物质组成特征对碎石土斜坡变形破坏影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 531-540.
[9] 阮永芬, 张虔, 乔文件, 裴利华, 闫明, 郭宇航, . 基于C-V-T模型的盾构穿越既有桥梁施工风险评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 552-562.
[10] 崔光耀, 麻建飞, 宁茂权, 唐再兴, 刘顺水, 田宇航, . 超大矩形顶管盾构隧道近接下穿高铁施工 加固方案对比分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 414-424.
[11] 董建华, 徐斌, 吴晓磊, 连博, . 隧道分级让压支护作用下围岩 弹塑性变形全过程解析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2123-2135.
[12] 李鹏飞, 勾宝亮, 朱萌, 高晓静, 郭彩霞. 基于镜像法的隧道地表沉降时间效应计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 799-807.
[13] 袁帅, 冯德旺, 张森豪, 邢运鹏, 柯尊启, . 考虑水力参数空间变异性的盾构 隧道开挖面稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3153-3162.
[14] 宋战平, 郭德赛, 徐甜, 华伟雄, . 基于非线性模糊层次分析法的TBM 施工风险评价模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1424-1433.
[15] 沈扬, 冯照雁, 邓珏, 陈锴嘉, 许俊红, . 南海珊瑚砂地基承载力模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1281-1290.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!