岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 939-950.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0307CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0307

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

钙源对大豆脲酶固化黄土强度和水稳定性的影响

马渊博1,董旭光1, 2,胡倩倩1,黄德昭1   

  1. 1. 宁夏大学 土木与水利工程学院,宁夏 银川 750021;2. 宁夏大学 宁夏土木工程防震减灾工程技术研究中心,宁夏 银川 750021
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-26 接受日期:2025-06-27 出版日期:2026-03-17 发布日期:2026-03-19
  • 通讯作者: 董旭光,男,1987年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事冻土及环境岩土相关的教学及研究工作。E-mail: dxguang568@163.com
  • 作者简介:马渊博,男,1997年生,博士研究生,主要从事微生物固化黄土方面的研究。E-mail: ybma1367@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.52368050,No.51968061);宁夏自然科学基金项目(No.2025AAC030153)。

Effects of calcium sources on the strength and water stability of loess solidified by soybean urease

MA Yuan-bo1, DONG Xu-guang1, 2, HU Qian-qian1, HUANG De-zhao1   

  1. 1. School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750021, China; 2. Ningxia Center for Research on Earthquake Protection and Disaster Mitigation in Civil Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750021, China
  • Received:2025-03-26 Accepted:2025-06-27 Online:2026-03-17 Published:2026-03-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52368050, 51968061) and the Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia Province (2025AAC030153).

摘要: 黄土高原地区水土流失严重、抗侵蚀能力弱等问题,主要在于黄土强度低、水稳定性差。大豆脲酶诱导碳酸钙沉积是一种绿色、低碳的生物固土技术,钙源是影响大豆脲酶固化土力学和水力特性的重要因素。选用氯化钙、醋酸钙和硝酸钙3种钙源制备胶结液处理黄土,并设置对照组以对比分析其固化效果。开展不同钙源固化黄土的系列宏微观试验,厘清不同胶结液浓度和养护周期固化黄土的强度和破坏特征、崩解演化过程、碳酸钙含量、矿物组分和微观形态等宏微观指标的发展规律及其联系。结果表明:硝酸钙固化土无侧限抗压强度最高可达1 857.24 kPa,较对照组提高约1.91倍;氯化钙固化土抗崩解性最佳,崩解时间最多可延长近3.52倍。固化土抗压强度和崩解时间与碳酸钙含量分别呈线性和指数关系。大豆脲酶诱导生成的方解石晶体通过胶结、填充和包裹等方式重塑了黄土微观结构,提高了颗粒密实度与整体性,从而显著提升了黄土强度和水稳定性。研究可为大豆脲酶固化黄土优选合适钙源提供有力支持。

关键词: 黄土, 大豆脲酶, 钙源, 碳酸钙, 微观结构

Abstract: The issues of severe soil and water loss and weak erosion resistance in the Loess Plateau region are primarily attributed to the low strength and poor water stability of loess. Soybean urease-induced calcium carbonate deposition is a green and low-carbon biological soil stabilization technology, in which the calcium source critically influences the mechanical and hydraulic properties of the solidified soil. Three calcium sources, calcium chloride, calcium acetate, and calcium nitrate, were selected to prepare cementation solutions for treating loess, with a control group established for comparative analysis of the solidification effects. A series of macro- and micro-tests were conducted on the loess solidified with different calcium sources to clarify the development patterns and interrelationships among macro- and micro-indicators, including strength, failure characteristics, disintegration evolution, calcium carbonate content (CCC), mineral composition, and micromorphology, under varying cementation solution concentrations and curing periods. The results demonstrate that the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of calcium nitrate-solidified soil reached 1 857.24 kPa, approximately 1.91 times higher than that of the control group. The calcium chloride-solidified soil exhibited the best disintegration resistance, with disintegration time extended by up to nearly 3.52 times. The UCS and disintegration time of the solidified soil showed linear and exponential relationships with CCC, respectively. The calcite crystals induced by soybean urease reshape the microstructure of loess through cementation, filling, and encapsulation, enhancing particle compactness and overall integrity, thereby significantly improving the strength and water stability of loess. This study provides robust support for selecting the optimal calcium source in soybean urease-solidified loess.

Key words: loess, soybean urease, calcium source, calcium carbonate, microstructure

中图分类号: TU444
[1] 田威, 贾祎恒, 云伟, 余宸, 程续. 脲酶诱导碳酸钙沉积对3D打印类砂岩试样力学性能与微观结构的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 767-779.
[2] 张彬, 邵帅, 邵生俊, 齐磊, 王泽驰, 赵梓君. 不同应力路径下黄土变形特性及四模量非线性模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 869-881.
[3] 张波波, 马芹永, . 氧化石墨烯和纳米二氧化硅增强模拟月壤地聚合物的制备及性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 607-626.
[4] 贺文昊, 田威, 云伟, 李璐, 赵航宇, 弋郭洋. 响应面法优化靶向激活微生物固化黄土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 659-673.
[5] 伍玲玲, 胡苏诚, 黄梅钟, 胡林, 田亚坤, 郑槐淼, 喻清, 韦昌富, 张志军. 微生物矿化处理铀尾砂强度非均质性分析:试验与模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 717-730.
[6] 姜海波, 刘建锋, 张军, 鲁功达, 谢良甫. 长距离输水渠道黄土湿陷性及微观结构特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 61-72.
[7] 王化哲, 刘观仕, 张跃缤, 田升奎, 林贤龙, 后培升. 基于非接触式温度场及湿度场测试技术的黄土水热向上迁移试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 73-87.
[8] 郅彬, 魏园钧, 王番, 张茜, 刘存利, 任会明, . 冻融循环作用下含Na2SO4盐原状黄土宏观强度与微观结构关联机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 106-120.
[9] 段书苏, 候志强, 王志佳, 胡俊, 张友良, 张建经. D-山梨醇对微生物诱导碳酸钙沉积作用效果及加固红黏土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 238-248.
[10] 张兴文, 曹净, 雷舒羽, 李育红, 程芸, 张柠锐, . 富里酸环境对含腐殖酸水泥土结构及渗透性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 249-261.
[11] 刘静, 王昊, 杨鑫, 苏进臣, 张友良, . 微生物诱导碳酸钙沉淀加固热带土质边坡现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 343-353.
[12] 吴子龙, 俞韬, 闫超, 邓永锋, 胡广青, 高宇航, 王璋, 王力, . 陕西黄土重金属污染分析与黄土/膨润土隔离墙处治初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2738-2748.
[13] 张淼, 李林, 郑瀚波, 李盼盼, . 考虑饱和度影响的结构性黄土弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2816-2824.
[14] 鄂天龙, 崔强, 孙志亮, 冯杨州, 李冰臻, 缪栋, 杨健, 苗田, . 新型短柱斜桩复合基础结构优化与承载机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2955-2966.
[15] 靳贵晓, 林劭聪, 姜启武, 黄明, 李熹, . 基于Kozeny-Carman方程的酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀固化砂土的渗流数学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2376-2386.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!