岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 1541-1552.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0392CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0392

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基质调控下粗粒定向含砾土饱和抗剪强度研究

董辉,蒋秀姿,文磊,徐平   

  1. 1. 湘潭大学 土木工程学院,湖南 湘潭 411105;2. 岩土力学与工程安全湖南省重点实验室,湖南 湘潭 411105
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-15 接受日期:2025-07-07 出版日期:2026-05-11 发布日期:2026-05-08
  • 作者简介:董辉,男,1976年生,博士,教授,主要从事环境地质与地质灾害方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail: donghui@xtu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 42272304);湖南省教育厅科学研究项目(No. 22C0046,No. 24B0125)。

Saturated shear strength of coarse grain oriented gravelly soil under matrix control

DONG Hui, JIANG Xiu-zi, WEN Lei, XU Ping   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, Hunan 411105, China; 2. Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering Safety, Xiangtan, Hunan 411105, China
  • Received:2025-04-15 Accepted:2025-07-07 Online:2026-05-11 Published:2026-05-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42272304) and the Science Foundation of Education Department of Hunan Province (22C0046, 24B0125).

摘要: 山前含砾土在多期流水作用下形成的粗粒定向特殊结构,加大了对其力学行为的刻画难度。既有研究中对粗粒定向影响含砾土力学性质的强关联条件,仍缺乏适用范围的系统认知。为明确粗粒定向的作用特征,针对粗粒量为30%的典型现场含砾土,选取粗粒定向和基质土黏性特征作为考察因素,开展了室内大型三轴试验,分析了抗剪强度等力学参量的非线性变化规律。结果表明:(1)粗粒定向结构使黏性基质含砾土抗剪强度衰减了5.99%~24.88%。当粗粒定向角≤45°时,各围压下含砾土抗剪强度均在0°时衰减程度最大,且粗粒定向的衰减作用随围压增加而减弱。当粗粒定向角>45°时,作用规律不显著。(2)粗粒定向结构导致砂性基质含砾土抗剪强度衰减了11.84%~20.46%。当粗粒定向角<45°时,各围压下抗剪强度随定向角度增大均呈线性衰减,在定向角为45°时达到最小值。当定向角>45°时,各围压下的抗剪强度均有所提高。(3)结合主剪切面路径发展和粗粒转动分析了粗粒定向结构对含砾土抗剪强度的作用方式,发现在黏性和砂性基质中粗粒定向含砾土的抗剪强度分别受粗粒转动和主剪切面的路径发展主导,且粗粒定向结构对砂性基质含砾土的支配作用较黏性基质更加显著。通过引入定向角对基质调节下粗粒定向结构含砾土的摩尔-库仑方程分别进行了修正。研究结果将为山前斜坡或场地稳定性评定的科学计算提供参考。

关键词: 含砾土, 大型三轴试验, 粗粒定向, 基质调控, 抗剪强度

Abstract: Gravelly soils formed at the base of mountains exhibit a coarse-grained orientation due to multi-stage water scouring, complicating the understanding of their mechanical behavior. Existing research indicates a strong correlation between coarse-grained orientation and the mechanical properties of gravelly soils; however, a systematic understanding of these effects remains lacking. To clarify the effect of coarse-grained orientation, we considered typical field gravelly soils with a coarse-grain content of 30% and cohesion in the matrix soil. A series of large-scale indoor triaxial tests was conducted to analyze the nonlinear variation of shear strength and its parameters. The results indicated that (1) the coarse-grained oriented structure attenuated the shear strength of clayey matrix gravelly soil by 5.99% to 24.88%. When the orientation angle of coarse grains is no more than 45°, the shear strength of gravelly soil under various confining pressures decreases most significantly at an angle of 0°, and the attenuation effect of coarse particle orientation weakens as confining pressure increases. When the orientation angle exceeds 45°, the influence of coarse-grained orientation becomes negligible. (2) The coarse-grained oriented structure attenuateds the shear strength of sandy matrix gravelly soil by 11.84% to 20.46%. When the orientation angle is less than 45°, the shear strength decreases almost linearly, reaching its minimum at 45° under various confining pressures. When the orientation angle exceeds 45°, the shear strength increases with the angle. (3) By examining the development of the main shear plane and the rotation of coarse particles, we analyzed the effect of coarse-grained directional structure on the shear strength of gravelly soil. It was found that the shear strength of coarse-grained directional gravelly soil in cohesive and sandy matrices is primarily influenced by the rotation of coarse particles and the development of the main shear plane, respectively. Furthermore, the influence of coarse-grained directional structure on sandy matrix gravelly soil was found to be more significant than on cohesive matrix gravelly soil. Additionally, we analyzed the reasons for the differences in matrix regulation. We modified the Mohr-Coulomb equations for gravelly soils with coarse-grained oriented structures under different matrix conditions by introducing orientation angles. The conclusions of this study will serve as a reference for the scientific assessment of stability in mountain front slopes or sites.

Key words: gravelly soil, large-scale triaxial test, coarse grain orientation, matrix regulation, shear strength

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 王家辉, 江洎洧, 孙逸飞, 王培清, 王保田, 陈亮, 周钺, 李超. 泥浆介质饱和下松散堆积体抗剪强度特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1313-1322.
[2] 黄叶宁, 邓华锋, 孔纲强, 李建林, 朱作祥, 周书桓, 李冠野. 考虑粗糙度影响的土-岩接触面剪切力学模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 731-742.
[3] 韩爽, 谈云志, 杨舒涵, 明华军, 吴军, 王冲. 膨胀珍珠岩增强固化淤泥土强度的火山灰活性效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 130-139.
[4] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[5] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[6] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[7] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[8] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[9] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[10] 刘畅, 代丽媛, 李彪, 童富果, 田斌, 周铨. 干湿循环作用下宽饱和度范围红壤土强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3811-3822.
[11] 王军, 张凯宇, 陈晟凯, 秦伟, 倪俊峰, 高紫阳, 张一帆, . 爆破挤淤法中炸药埋深对土体参数影响的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 123-132.
[12] 刘吉福. 排水固结堤坝稳定分析新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 106-114.
[13] 张雅琴, 杨平, 张婷, 韩琳亮. 含盐量及冻融条件对冻融氯盐粉质黏土静动强度特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 157-166.
[14] 张化进, 吴顺川, 李兵磊, 赵宇松, . 基于高斯过程回归的岩石抗剪强度参数不确定性估测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 415-423.
[15] 朱俊宇, 裴利华, 桂跃, . 含有机质土抗剪强度再认识——基于土壤有机质赋存形态的认知[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 451-460.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!