岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 2117-2130.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0512CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0512

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

强/让压支护下软岩大变形隧道力学响应对比

吴奎1,邢晨哲1,秦溯2,赵南南1   

  1. 1. 西安建筑科技大学 理学院,陕西 西安 710055;2. 中铁一局集团有限公司,陕西 西安 710054
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-19 接受日期:2025-09-16 出版日期:2026-06-11 发布日期:2026-06-08
  • 通讯作者: 赵南南,男,1993年生,博士,讲师,主要从事隧道大变形机制及控制方面的研究。E-mail: zhaonannan@xauat.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:吴奎,男,1994年生,博士,副教授,主要从事地下工程防灾减灾方面的研究。E-mail: wukuigz@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.12202334,No.52408438);陕西省重点研发计划(No.2025SF-YBXM-553)。

Comparison of mechanical responses of soft rock tunnels with large deformation under strong/yielding supports

WU Kui1, XING Chen-zhe1, QIN Su2, ZHAO Nan-nan1   

  1. 1. School of Science, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710055, China; 2. China Railway First Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China
  • Received:2025-05-19 Accepted:2025-09-16 Online:2026-06-11 Published:2026-06-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12202334, 52408438) and the Shaanxi Province Key Research and Development Plan (2025SF-YBXM-553).

摘要: 软岩隧道大变形是实现隧道强国目标必须要攻克的工程技术难题。但是,目前围岩变形约束/释放与围岩压力及衬砌承载能力之间的关系仍未厘清,导致支护型式选择及设计参数确定依然存在理论瓶颈。为解决该问题,采用理论解析的方法对软岩大变形隧道进行力学建模与分析,试图建立它们之间的理论联系。首先,给出了围岩压力/衬砌承载能力与衬砌厚度之间关系的理论表达式,揭示了当衬砌厚度小于某一临界值时,增加其厚度诱发的围岩压力增长速率反而大于衬砌承载能力增长速率的理论原因。其次,以广义Kelvin模型表征围岩的时效变形,将让压衬砌的变形过程简化为变形释放阶段和变形控制阶段,建立了隧道围岩与让压衬砌相互作用的力学模型,给出了不同变形阶段的隧道/衬砌位移和衬砌压力解析解。进一步,将上述让压衬砌作用下的解析解退化为强支护作用下的理论解答。再者,通过与既有文献结果的对比,以及在实际工程中的应用,所建立的理论模型的可靠性得到了较好验证。最后,基于理论解答,开展了综合的参数分析,包括围岩变形能力、强支护衬砌厚度、隧道让压位移以及屈服支护阻力。结果表明:在某些大变形条件下,若使用强支护则所需的衬砌厚度过大,有必要采用让压衬砌。让压衬砌的让压位移和屈服支护阻力均存在合理的范围,必须结合围岩和衬砌自身的力学性质来确定。所提出的简洁隧道理论模型,对相关工程初期阶段的支护快速设计具有重要的理论支撑作用。

关键词: 软岩隧道, 时效变形, 强支护, 让压衬砌, 支护效果

Abstract: Large deformation of soft rock tunnels is an engineering and technical challenge that must be addressed to realize the ambition of becoming a leading nation in tunnel construction. However, the intricate relationship between rock deformation constraint/release, rock pressure and lining bearing capacity remains ambiguous, posing theoretical obstacles in selecting appropriate support types and determination of design parameters. To tackle this challenge, this study adopts theoretical analysis method to model and analyze the mechanism of large deformation of soft rock tunnels, attempting to establish a theoretical relationship among these factors. Firstly, theoretical formulations are presented to elucidate the relationship between rock pressure/lining bearing capacity and lining thickness, revealing the theoretical reason why, when the lining thickness is less than a certain critical value, increasing its thickness induces a greater rate of increase in surrounding rock pressure than in the bearing capacity of the lining. Secondly, the generalized Kelvin model is employed to characterize the time-dependent deformation of surrounding rock, and the deformation process of yielding lining is simplified into the deformation release stage and deformation control stage. A tunnel mechanical model describing the interaction between surrounding rock and yielding lining is established, and analytical solutions for tunnel/lining displacement and lining pressure at different deformation stages are provided. The above analytical solutions for yielding lining supported tunnels can further be degenerated to those under the strong support action. Moreover, the reliability and feasibility of the theoretical model established in this study are well verified by comparing with results in previous reference and by applying it in a practical project. Finally, based on the proposed analytical solutions, a comprehensive parametric investigation is conducted, including the deformation capacity of surrounding rock, thickness of strong support, tunnel yielding displacement, and yielding resistance. The results indicate that under some large deformation conditions, if strong support is used, the required lining thickness is excessively large, necessitating the adoption of yielding lining. There exist reasonable ranges for both the yielding displacement and yielding resistance of yielding lining, which should be determined considering the mechanical properties of surrounding rock and lining. The concise tunnel theoretical model provided in this study can play an important theoretical support for the rapid design in the preliminary stage of related projects.

Key words: soft rock tunnel, time-dependent deformation, strong support, yielding lining, supporting effect

中图分类号: TE93
[1] 吴奎, 王子岩, 徐晨, 杨跃宗, 赵南南. 缓冲层影响下软岩大变形隧道时效力学行为分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 183-197.
[2] 舒晓云, 田洪铭, 陈卫忠, 朱珍德, 杨帆, 田云, 张朝轩, 张韬, . 某引水隧洞大变形缓冲层支护方案设计参数优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3117-3129.
[3] 邓鹏海, 刘泉声, 黄兴. 隧道底板渐进破裂碎胀大变形:一种新的底鼓机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1512-1529.
[4] 雷升祥, 赵伟. 软岩隧道大变形环向让压支护机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1039-1047.
[5] 陈卫忠, 田 云, 王学海, 田洪铭, 曹怀轩, 谢华东, . 基于修正[BQ]值的软岩隧道挤压变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3125-3134.
[6] 周 辉 ,徐荣超,张传庆 ,卢景景 ,孟凡震 ,沈 峥,. 预应力锚杆内锚固段长度效应研究[J]. , 2015, 36(9): 2688-2694.
[7] 侯公羽 ,李晶晶 ,杨 悦 ,王亚潇 ,李庆伟 ,梁永辉,. 围岩弹塑性变形条件下锚杆、喷混凝土和U型钢的支护效果研究[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1357-1366.
[8] 魏 星,沈 乐,陶志平. 富水软岩隧道突泥塌方及地层沉降的模型试验[J]. , 2012, 33(8): 2291-2296.
[9] 何本国 ,张志强 ,何 川 ,王俊奇 . 构造应力场中的软岩客运专线双线隧道稳定性研究[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1535-1541.
[10] 唐世斌,唐春安,李连崇,张永彬. 湿度扩散诱发的隧洞时效变形数值模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 697-0703.
[11] 陈卫忠 ,田洪铭 ,杨阜东 ,耿亚梅. 泡沫混凝土预留变形层对深埋软岩隧道长期稳定性影响研究[J]. , 2011, 32(9): 2577-2583.
[12] 吕爱钟 ,莫晓明 . 智能预测在三峡永久船闸中隔墩时效变形分析中的应用[J]. , 2007, 28(5): 1066-1068.
[13] 李晓红 ,李登新 ,靳晓光 ,顾义磊,. 初期支护对软岩隧道围岩稳定性和位移影响分析[J]. , 2005, 26(8): 1207-1210.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!