岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 562-570.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0732CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0732

• 压缩空气储能地下工程专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

含水层压缩空气储能空间封闭性评价:理论与应用

谢传金1,罗红梅1,白冰2,李继岩1,杨横涛2,郑文召1   

  1. 1. 中国石化胜利油田分公司 勘探开发研究院,山东 东营 257015; 2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程安全全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-14 接受日期:2025-11-03 出版日期:2026-02-10 发布日期:2026-02-05
  • 通讯作者: 罗红梅,女,1973年生,博士,研究员,主要从事油气地球物理新技术研发与地震地质综合研究。E-mail: luohongmei635.slyt@sinopec.com
  • 作者简介:谢传金,男,1986年生,硕士,副研究员,主要从事油气地质学研究。E-mail: Xiechuanjin.slyt@sinopec.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国石化科技攻关项目(No. P23080)

Evaluation of the sealing performance of compressed air energy storage spaces in aquifers: theory and applications

XIE Chuan-jin1, LUO Hong-mei1, BAI Bing2, LI Ji-yan1, YANG Heng-tao2, ZHENG Wen-zhao1   

  1. 1. Exploration and Development Research Institute, Shengli Oilfield Company, SINOPEC, Dongying, Shandong 257015, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2025-07-14 Accepted:2025-11-03 Online:2026-02-10 Published:2026-02-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Sinopec Science and Technology Project (P23080).

摘要:

在大力发展新能源背景下,储能日益成为重要的战略手段。含水层压缩空气储能(compressed air energy storage in aquifers,简称CAESA)作为一种新型储能技术,因具有分布广、规模大等优势正受到关注,在勘探开发程度较高的油区含水层开展压缩空气储能具有更显著的优势。CAESA中,盖层系统的密封性控制着储库容量和安全性。充分挖掘盖层系统的封闭潜力需要依靠定量评价指标。针对该类工程特征,提出了一种最大封闭压力模型(Pmax)作为盖层(单元)封闭能力的定义,并通过数学建模给出了具体的确定方法。该模型可包容各类封闭机制,同时首次从数学物理上解释了盖层厚度的封闭机制。该指标可以作为选址阶段度量盖层封闭性的单一主控指标使用。以该指标为基础,结合系统的短板原理,定义了适用于整个盖层系统封闭性度量的盖层安全封闭压力指标Psafe,并给出了计算方法流程,可以在工程开发设计阶段采用。以中国石化胜利油田规划建设的KD642-7示范工程应用为例初步印证了该模型的合理性。

关键词: 压缩空气储能, 含水层, 盖层, 封闭性, 最大封闭压力

Abstract:

In the context of the rapid development of new energy technologies, energy storage has emerged as a crucial strategic capability. As a new energy storage technology, compressed air energy storage in aquifers (CAESA) is receiving attention due to its advantages of wide distribution and large scale. It has more significant advantages in carrying out compressed air energy storage in aquifers with high exploration and development levels in oil regions. In CAESA, the sealing performance of the caprock system controls the storage capacity and safety. Fully tapping into the sealing potential of the caprock system requires the use of quantitative evaluation indicators. This article proposes a maximum sealing pressure model (Pmax model) to define the sealing capacity of a caprock segment, and provides a method for determining Pmax via mathematical modeling. This model can accommodate various sealing mechanisms, and for the first time, it explains the sealing mechanism of the thickness of the caprock layer from a mathematical and physical perspective. This indicator can be used as a single indicator to measure the sealing performance of the caprock layer during the site selection stage. Based on this indicator and in combination with the short-board principle, we propose the safe sealing pressure index Psafe to quantify the sealing performance of the entire caprock system. We also provide the calculation method and a flowchart, which can be applied during the engineering development and design stage. Finally, using the KD642-7 pilot project planned by Sinopec Shengli Oilfield as an example, the model’s validity has been preliminarily demonstrated.

Key words: compressed air energy storage, aquifer, caprock, sealing performance, maximum sealing pressure

中图分类号: TU 457
[1] 曹校勇, 刘瑞辉, 李建斐, 叶欣欣, 耿珺洋, 谭海星. 中硬岩地层人工地下储气硐室衬砌结构密封体系及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[2] 葛鑫博, 黄俊, 赵同彬, 陶刚, 马洪岭, 王威. 人工智能在压缩空气储能地下工程中的应用综述[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 413-425.
[3] 张国华, 相月, 张世殊, 王薪锦, 郭辉, 熊峰, 华东杰. 压缩空气储能硐库运行全过程围岩弹塑性变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 383-401.
[4] 黄浚鸣, 赵向阳, 马洪岭, 王磊, 张佳敏. 盐穴压缩空气储能耦合沉渣储热的综合利用可行性分析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 373-382.
[5] 孙冠华, 耿璇, 姜长飞, 石露, 张金涛, 江巍. 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬硐库围岩破坏区解析模型及演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 359-372.
[6] 胡港, 芮瑞, 江强强, 王永平, 张文涛. 压缩空气储能隧道式硬岩储气硐起裂角与起裂压力二维数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 549-561.
[7] 刘顺, 程昊德, 贾宁, 王洪播, 尹宏磊. 压缩空气储能隧道式地下内衬硐库的伯努利管温控方案研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 539-548.
[8] 曹校勇, 关少钰, 叶欣欣. 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬储气洞室群上覆岩体稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 530-538.
[9] 张国华, 郭辉, 张世殊, 周芝仪, 相月, 熊峰, 华东杰. 压缩空气储能地下储气库椭圆形断面最佳轴比及运行压力区间确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 515-529.
[10] 孙冠华, 王章星, 王娇, 董沂鑫, 石露, 刘治军, 林姗. 基于FDEM的地下内衬硐库密封结构-衬砌分缝协同优化设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 497-514.
[11] 程昊德, 贾宁, 刘顺, 聂会建, 梁昊. 压缩空气储能人工硐库多层密封结构热传递算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 470-484.
[12] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[13] 张世殊, 李青春, 刘松玉, 崔德山, 李洪江, 黎伟, 陈盼. 深厚覆盖层孔内原位测试技术现状与展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 4009-4028.
[14] 孙冠华, 王娇, 于显杨, 易琪, 朱开源, 王章星, 耿璇, 屈杰, . 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬硐库基本原理与分析方法研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 1-25.
[15] 贾宁, 刘顺, 王洪播. 压缩空气储能人工硐库热力耦合解析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2263-2278.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!