岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 426-436.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0962CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0962

• 压缩空气储能地下工程专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

中硬岩地层人工地下储气硐室衬砌结构密封体系及模型试验研究

曹校勇1, 2,刘瑞辉2,李建斐2,叶欣欣2,耿珺洋2,谭海星2   

  1. 1. 长安大学 公路学院,陕西 西安 710064;2. 中交第一公路勘察设计研究院有限公司,陕西 西安 710075
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-10 接受日期:2025-12-11 出版日期:2026-02-10 发布日期:2026-02-04
  • 通讯作者: 刘瑞辉,男,1995年生,硕士,工程师,主要从事压缩空气储能人工硐室、隧道与地下工程结构设计等方面的研究工作。 E-mail:1012468857@qq.com
  • 作者简介:曹校勇,男,1976年生,博士研究生,正高级工程师,主要从事压缩空气储能人工硐室、隧道与地下工程结构设计等方面的研究工作。E-mail:306534066@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省创新能力支撑计划(No. 2025RS-CXTD-017);陕西省重点研发计划(No. S2025-YF-YBWL-2212);中交集团科创基金(No. RP2024044031)。

Sealing system design and model testing of lining structures for artificial underground gas storage caverns in medium-hard rock strata

CAO Xiao-yong1, 2, LIU Rui-hui2, LI Jian-fei2, YE Xin-xin2, GENG Jun-yang2, TAN Hai-xing2   

  1. 1. School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710064, China; 2. CCCC First Highway Consultants Co., Ltd., Xi’an, Shaanxi 710075, China
  • Received:2025-09-10 Accepted:2025-12-11 Online:2026-02-10 Published:2026-02-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Shaanxi Provincial Innovation Capability Support Program Project (2025RS-CXTD-017), the Shaanxi Provincial Key Research and Development Program Project (S2025-YF-YBWL-2212) and the CSCI Science and Technology Innovation Fund Project (RP2024044031).

摘要: 为深入掌握人工地下储气库反复循环高压作用下衬砌结构体系的服役性能,考虑岩体的长期损伤变形,采用数值模拟和物理模型试验方法,系统性地分析高压循环荷载作用下储气库可适应变形支护体系的受力变形演化过程,揭示人工地下储气库衬砌结构循环加卸压过程中变形与力学响应特性,验证灰岩、砂岩等中等硬度岩层中建造薄钢衬人工地下储气硐室设计思路的可行性。研究结果表明:提出采用“6 mm薄钢衬+波拱构造+橡胶填充+二次衬砌”的可适应变形支护体系设计方案可实现在循环荷载耦合作用下支护体系随围岩协调变形和传递内压荷载作用,具备吸收硐库内部高内压和密封能力。并在高内压循环荷载作用下,密封钢衬和环向钢筋的应力-应变时程曲线与加压时程曲线规律整体上协同响应呈阶梯上升状态,在0~6 MPa内钢衬应变增长较为迅速,应变值变化较大;在6~10 MPa内,随着压力不断增大应变增长值逐渐减小,且随着循环次数增加,钢衬应变值出现不同程度的增大,但均未超过钢衬的屈服应变2‰。而二次衬砌外环钢筋均比内环钢筋应力值大,在后期地下储气库设计时,可采用增大外环钢筋直径的不对称钢筋设计方案,提高衬砌整体承载能力。同时,研制的15 MPa级别水气压一体化循环加卸载储气硐室密封结构试验及监测系统将是进一步分析研究人工储气库衬砌结构的有力工具,相关成果可为后续中硬岩地层压缩空气人工地下储气库建造关键技术提供基础试验数据和有益参考。

关键词: 压缩空气储能, 人工地下储气库, 模型试验, 衬砌结构支护体系, 中硬岩地层

Abstract: To better understand the in-service performance of the lining structural system in artificial underground gas storage facilities under repeated high-pressure cyclic loading, we conducted numerical simulations and physical model tests. The analyses accounted for long-term damage-induced deformation of the surrounding rock mass and examined the evolution of stress and deformation in an adaptable support system during cyclic pressurization. This study reveals the deformation and mechanical response characteristics of the lining structure during cyclic pressurization and depressurization in artificial underground gas storage, and verifies the feasibility of constructing underground gas storage caverns with thin steel linings in medium-hardness rock layers such as limestone and sandstone. The results indicate that the proposed adaptable support system design—comprising a 6 mm thin steel lining, wave-arch structures, rubber filling, and a secondary lining can achieve coordinated deformation with the surrounding rock and effectively transfer internal pressure under coupled cyclic loading. This system demonstrates the capacity to absorb high internal pressure and maintain sealing integrity. Under high internal pressure cyclic loading, the stress-strain time-history curves of the sealing steel lining and the circumferential reinforcement respond synergistically with the pressure curve, showing a stepwise increasing trend. Within the 0-6 MPa range, the strain of the steel lining increases rapidly with significant variation. Between 6 MPa and 10 MPa, the strain growth rate gradually decreases as the pressure rises. With an increasing number of cycles, the strain of the steel lining increases to varying degrees, but none exceed the yield strain of 2‰. Moreover, the stress in the outer-ring reinforcement of the secondary lining is consistently higher than that in the inner-ring reinforcement. Therefore, in future designs of underground gas storage, an asymmetric reinforcement design with larger-diameter outer-ring reinforcement could be adopted to enhance the overall load-bearing capacity of the lining. Additionally, the developed 15 MPa-level integrated water-air cyclic loading and unloading test and monitoring system for sealing structures in gas storage caverns will serve as a powerful tool for further analysis of artificial gas storage lining structures. The findings of this study provide fundamental experimental data and valuable references for subsequent key technologies in the construction of compressed air energy storage facilities in medium-hard rock formations.

Key words: compressed air energy storage, artificial underground gas storage facility, model test, lining structure support system, medium hard rock formation

中图分类号: TU 93
[1] 程昊德, 贾宁, 刘顺, 聂会建, 梁昊. 压缩空气储能人工硐库多层密封结构热传递算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 470-484.
[2] 孙冠华, 王章星, 王娇, 董沂鑫, 石露, 刘治军, 林姗. 基于FDEM的地下内衬硐库密封结构-衬砌分缝协同优化设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 497-514.
[3] 张国华, 郭辉, 张世殊, 周芝仪, 相月, 熊峰, 华东杰. 压缩空气储能地下储气库椭圆形断面最佳轴比及运行压力区间确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 515-529.
[4] 曹校勇, 关少钰, 叶欣欣. 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬储气洞室群上覆岩体稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 530-538.
[5] 刘顺, 程昊德, 贾宁, 王洪播, 尹宏磊. 压缩空气储能隧道式地下内衬硐库的伯努利管温控方案研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 539-548.
[6] 胡港, 芮瑞, 江强强, 王永平, 张文涛. 压缩空气储能隧道式硬岩储气硐起裂角与起裂压力二维数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 549-561.
[7] 谢传金, 罗红梅, 白冰, 李继岩, 杨横涛, 郑文召. 含水层压缩空气储能空间封闭性评价:理论与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 562-570.
[8] 孙冠华, 耿璇, 姜长飞, 石露, 张金涛, 江巍. 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬硐库围岩破坏区解析模型及演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 359-372.
[9] 黄浚鸣, 赵向阳, 马洪岭, 王磊, 张佳敏. 盐穴压缩空气储能耦合沉渣储热的综合利用可行性分析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 373-382.
[10] 张国华, 相月, 张世殊, 王薪锦, 郭辉, 熊峰, 华东杰. 压缩空气储能硐库运行全过程围岩弹塑性变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 383-401.
[11] 葛鑫博, 黄俊, 赵同彬, 陶刚, 马洪岭, 王威. 人工智能在压缩空气储能地下工程中的应用综述[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 413-425.
[12] 陈树理, 郭伟, 任宇晓, 陈伟. 软土夹层地基上的互锁式L型沉箱稳定性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 49-60.
[13] 吴金标, 曾柳祁, 江益辉, 槐荣国, 曾程. 不同饱和度砂土中浅埋管道上拔抗力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 209-218.
[14] 贾宝新, 袁庆雷. 注浆影响下隧道渗流场及最小覆土厚度修正研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 255-266.
[15] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!