岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (9): 3211-3224.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0890CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0890

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

知识−数据融合驱动的花岗岩破裂阶段智能识别

蔡浩然1,张巍1,徐文瀚1,吴云2,许文涛1,朱鸿鹄1   

  1. 1. 南京大学 地球科学与工程学院,江苏 南京 210023;2. 中国矿业大学 资源与地球科学学院,江苏 徐州 221116
  • 收稿日期:2026-08-18 接受日期:2026-03-25 出版日期:2026-09-11 发布日期:2026-09-01
  • 通讯作者: 张巍,男,1974年生,博士,副教授,主要从事地质灾害数智融合预警方向的科研与教学工作。E-mail: wzhang@nju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:蔡浩然,男,1999年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩石力学与工程研究。E-mail: 522023290001@smail.nju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.42577218);江苏省前沿技术研发计划项目(No.BF2024056);江苏省国际科技合作/港澳台科技合作项目(No.BZ2023056)。

Intelligent identification of granite fracture stages driven by knowledge–data integration

CAI Hao-ran1, ZHANG Wei1, XU Wen-han1, WU Yun2, XU Wen-tao1, ZHU Hong-hu1   

  1. 1. School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China; 2. School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China
  • Received:2026-08-18 Accepted:2026-03-25 Online:2026-09-11 Published:2026-09-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42577218), the Program Project of Jiangsu Province Frontier Technology Research and Development (BF2024056) and the Cooperation Program of Jiangsu Province International Science and Technology Cooperation/Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan Science and Technology (BZ2023056).

摘要:

矿山开采、地下储能及深部隧道掘进等岩石工程中,岩石破裂行为突发性强、潜在破坏性大,精准感知岩石破裂所处的不同阶段是实现地质灾害预警与工程风险防控的关键。如何基于声发射等现有监测技术实现岩石破裂行为特征多元融合与状态判别仍有待深入。提出了一种知识与数据融合驱动的岩石破裂阶段智能识别框架。以花岗岩为例,首先依据岩石力学理论构建阶段分级规则知识进行声发射数据自动标注;再结合极限梯度提升(extreme gradient boosting,简称XGBoost)、随机森林(random forest,简称RF)与支持向量机(support vector machine,简称SVM)三种机器学习算法,分别实现了数据驱动下花岗岩破裂不同阶段的智能识别。比较3种模型的识别结果后发现,XGBoost模型综合性能最优,其加权F1-score(各类别F1值按样本数加权的平均)为0.860 3,宏平均召回率为80.16%,宏平均AUC值为0.97。宏平均AUC为所有类别AUC的算术均值;受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,简称ROC)曲线以假正例率、真正例率为横纵轴,表征不同阈值下模型判别效果;AUC即ROC曲线下面积,取值0~1,数值越高二分类性能越好。识别可解释的关键特征包括累计能量、累计振铃数、振铃数与撞击数,其中前两者的SHAP值(用于量化各特征对模型预测结果的贡献程度)贡献最高。此研究为岩石破裂状态的自动识别与灾变预警构建了一种新范式。

关键词: 知识驱动, 数据驱动, 可解释性, 岩石破裂, 声发射, 智能识别

Abstract:

In rock engineering scenarios, such as mining extraction, underground energy storage, and deep tunnel excavation, rock fracture behavior is often abrupt and potentially destructive. Therefore, accurately perceiving the different stages of rock fracture is essential for geological hazard early warning and engineering risk mitigation. However, how to achieve multi-source feature fusion and reliable state discrimination of rock fracture behavior based on existing monitoring techniques, especially acoustic emission, still requires further investigation. This study proposes an intelligent identification framework for rock fracture stages driven by the fusion of knowledge and data. Taking granite as a representative material, stage classification rule knowledge was first established based on rock mechanics theory, and the resulting rules were then used to automatically annotate acoustic emission data. On this basis, three machine learning algorithms, namely extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM), were employed in a data-driven framework to identify different stages of granite fracture. A comparative analysis of the three models shows that the XGBoost model achieves the best overall performance, with a weighted F1-score (the weighted average of per-class F1-scores by sample count) of 0.860 3, a macro-average recall of 80.16%, and a macro-average AUC of 0.97. Macro-average AUC refers to the arithmetic mean of AUC values across all classes. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve plots false positive rate versus true positive rate to illustrate model discriminative performance at different thresholds. AUC denotes the area under the ROC curve, ranging from 0 to 1, where higher values correspond to better binary classification performance. The key interpretable features for stage recognition include cumulative energy, cumulative ring-down count, ring-down count, and hit count. Among these, cumulative energy and cumulative ring-down count showed the largest SHAP (quantify the contribution of each feature to model predictions) contributions. This study establishes a new paradigm for the automatic identification of rock fracture states and disaster warning in rock engineering.

Key words: knowledge-driven, data-driven, interpretability, rock fracture, acoustic emission, intelligent identification

中图分类号: TU452
[1] 段敏克, 戴佳志, 杨科, 唐劲舟, 周坤友, 庞东杰. 分级循环载荷下层理砂岩力学各向异性及声发射特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(9): 3025-3040.
[2] 郎浩天, 梁鹏, 王聚贤, 孟凡阳, 卞韵淇, 叶丰恺, 刘洋. 基于深度学习与声发射的岩石拉剪裂纹实时识别模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2838-2850.
[3] 周明哲, 富海鹰, 孔 俐, 李雨梵, 赵炎炎. 基于点云粗糙度的岩体结构面迹线智能识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2629-2637.
[4] 任凌冉, 李利萍, 唐巨鹏, 潘一山, 杨松, 张昕. 瓦斯压力下构造带突出煤体损伤破裂规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2380-2395.
[5] 刘德仁, 王凯强, 张延杰, 王帅群, 王宇飞. 基于机器学习的陇西黄土湿陷系数预测及可解释性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2235-2247.
[6] 刘佳奇, 张碧川, 冯增朝, 李学成, 郭纪哲. 实时高温循环加卸载下花岗岩双轴力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1553-1566.
[7] 张坤博, 黄彦华, 印昊, 李明旭, 杨景. 热损伤灰岩声发射特征及巴西劈裂破坏规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1443-1458.
[8] 王琼, 田升奎, 刘观仕, 苏薇, 刘宜春, 叶为民. 融合先验物理知识和可解性分析的导热系数集成学习预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 674-690.
[9] 赵康, 黄奇正, 石一辰, 马超, 冯印成, 田向勤, 刘浪. 不同粉煤灰掺量尾砂胶结充填体声发射与破坏预警特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 88-100.
[10] 黄曼, 宁昊晟, 洪陈杰, 陶志刚, 刘雨星, 张贺, . 基于第二代负泊松比锚杆加固的充填结构面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 131-140.
[11] 张胜, 柏巍, 徐鼎平, 郑虹, 江权, 李志伟, 向天兵, . 循环荷载作用下砂岩损伤演化的声发射与电阻率监测及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 53-66.
[12] 刘一鸣, 李振, 冯国瑞, 杨鹏, 白锦文, 黄炳雄, 李东, . 循环加卸载下裂隙砂岩声−热响应特征及前兆规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2773-2791.
[13] 司马劲松, 许强, 董秀军, 邓博, 何秋霖, 黎浩良, 刘杰, 雷文权. 基于改进区域生长算法对岩体结构面识别的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2253-2264.
[14] 雷瑞德, 顾清恒, 胡超, 贺培, 周林森, . 裂隙砂岩声发射信号特征及破裂前兆识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2023-2038.
[15] 储超群, 包兴佳, 毛明发, 吴顺川, 崔贺佳, . 深地灰岩三轴压缩声发射特征及破坏形式试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2049-2061.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!