岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8): 2838-2850.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0932CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0932

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于深度学习与声发射的岩石拉剪裂纹实时识别模型

郎浩天1,梁鹏1, 2,王聚贤1,孟凡阳1,卞韵淇1,叶丰恺1,刘洋1   

  1. 1. 华北理工大学 矿业工程学院,河北 唐山 063210;2. 华北理工大学 河北省矿山绿色智能开采技术创新中心,河北 唐山 063210
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-31 接受日期:2025-11-03 出版日期:2026-08-11 发布日期:2026-08-18
  • 通讯作者: 梁鹏,男,1987年生,博士,副教授,从事矿山岩石力学领域的教学与科研工作。E-mail:hnlp87@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52474098);河北省自然科学基金(No. D2024209014);大学生创新创业训练计划项目(No. S202510081105)。

A real-time identification model for tensile-shear cracks in rock based on deep learning and acoustic emission

LANG Hao-tian1, LIANG Peng1, 2, WANG Ju-xian1, MENG Fan-yang1, BIAN Yun-qi1, YE Feng-kai1, LIU Yang1   

  1. 1. College of Mining Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, Hebei 063210, China; 2. Hebei Mining Green Intelligent Mining Technology Innovation Center, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, Hebei 063210, China
  • Received:2025-08-31 Accepted:2025-11-03 Online:2026-08-11 Published:2026-08-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52474098), the Hebei Provincial Natural Science Foundation (D2024209014) and the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program for College Students(S202510081105)

摘要: 岩石破裂过程中裂纹类型的精准识别,对揭示岩体破坏机制、防控工程灾害具有重要意义。开展砂岩剪切试验与巴西劈裂声发射试验,采用Pearson与随机森林方法优选声发射参数,运用合成少数类过采样技术(synthetic minority over- sampling technique,简称SMOTE)平衡拉剪裂纹数据,构建融合拉剪裂纹特征的声发射数据集。结合多种机器学习模型性能评估指标,确定卷积神经网络(convolutional neural network,简称CNN)的基础识别模型架构,进而构建卷积神经网络-长短期记忆网络-多头注意力机制(CNN-long short term memory-multi head attention,简称CNN-LSTM-multi head attention)模型、卷积神经网络-门控循环单元(CNN-gated recurrent unit,简称CNN-GRU)模型、贝叶斯优化-卷积神经网络-长短期记忆网络(Bayesian optimization-CNN-LSTM,简称BO-CNN-LSTM)模型3种深度学习模型,发现BO-CNN-LSTM模型最适用于岩石裂纹类型的实时识别,8个最优识别参数为平均频率、持续时间、初始频率、上升时间、峰频、中心频率、幅值和均方根(root mean square,简称RMS)电压,综合准确率达97.89%。基于砂岩单轴压缩试验,对比3种深度学习模型的泛化性能,最优实时识别模型BO-CNN-LSTM与传统高斯混合模型(Gaussian mixture model,简称GMM)-支持向量机(support vector machine,简称SVM)模型的裂纹分类结果差异小于5%。新构建的裂纹类型实时识别模型具备较高的识别精度与泛化能力,可为岩石裂纹类型的实时识别提供可靠依据。

关键词: 声发射, 裂纹分类, 深度学习, 实时识别

Abstract: Accurate identification of crack types during rock fracturing is of great significance for revealing rock mass failure mechanisms and preventing engineering disasters. Shear tests and Brazilian splitting acoustic emission (AE) tests were conducted on sandstone. The Pearson correlation coefficient and random forest methods were employed to optimize AE parameters. The SMOTE (synthetic minority over-sampling technique) method was used to balance the tensile-shear crack dataset, thereby constructing an integrated AE dataset that incorporates tensile-shear crack characteristics. By considering various machine learning model performance evaluation metrics, the convolutional neural network (CNN) was determined as the foundational architecture for the identification model. Subsequently, three deep learning models were constructed: CNN-LSTM (long short term memory)-multi head attention, CNN-GRU (gated recurrent unit), and BO (Bayesian optimization)-CNN-LSTM. It was found that the BO-CNN-LSTM model is most suitable for the real-time identification of rock crack types. The eight optimal identification parameters are average frequency, duration, initial frequency, rise time, peak frequency, centroid frequency, amplitude, and root mean square (RMS) voltage, achieving a comprehensive accuracy of 97.89%. Based on sandstone uniaxial compression tests, the generalization performance of the three deep learning models was compared. The difference in crack classification results between the optimal real-time identification model BO-CNN-LSTM and the conventional Gaussian mixture model-support vector machine (GMM-SVM) clustering model was less than 5%. The newly developed real-time crack type identification model possesses high recognition accuracy and generalization capability, providing a reliable basis for the real-time identification of rock crack types.

Key words: acoustic emission, crack classification, deep learning, real-time identification

中图分类号: TU 45;TP 183
[1] 周立云, 彭平安, 王李管, 孟和, 李金波. 基于多模态时频融合与轻量回归网络的微震P波到时自动拾取方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2851-2865.
[2] 任凌冉, 李利萍, 唐巨鹏, 潘一山, 杨松, 张昕. 瓦斯压力下构造带突出煤体损伤破裂规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2380-2395.
[3] 刘佳奇, 张碧川, 冯增朝, 李学成, 郭纪哲. 实时高温循环加卸载下花岗岩双轴力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1553-1566.
[4] 张坤博, 黄彦华, 印昊, 李明旭, 杨景. 热损伤灰岩声发射特征及巴西劈裂破坏规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1443-1458.
[5] 赵康, 黄奇正, 石一辰, 马超, 冯印成, 田向勤, 刘浪. 不同粉煤灰掺量尾砂胶结充填体声发射与破坏预警特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 88-100.
[6] 张胜, 柏巍, 徐鼎平, 郑虹, 江权, 李志伟, 向天兵, . 循环荷载作用下砂岩损伤演化的声发射与电阻率监测及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 53-66.
[7] 黄曼, 宁昊晟, 洪陈杰, 陶志刚, 刘雨星, 张贺, . 基于第二代负泊松比锚杆加固的充填结构面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 131-140.
[8] 刘一鸣, 李振, 冯国瑞, 杨鹏, 白锦文, 黄炳雄, 李东, . 循环加卸载下裂隙砂岩声−热响应特征及前兆规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2773-2791.
[9] 宋牧原, 杨明辉, 陈伟, 卢贤锥, . 基于自注意力-循环神经网络模型的盾构引发的土体沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2613-2625.
[10] 储超群, 包兴佳, 毛明发, 吴顺川, 崔贺佳, . 深地灰岩三轴压缩声发射特征及破坏形式试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2049-2061.
[11] 雷瑞德, 顾清恒, 胡超, 贺培, 周林森, . 裂隙砂岩声发射信号特征及破裂前兆识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2023-2038.
[12] 吕萌, 王亮清, 谢妮, 朱林锋, 安彩龙, 柯睿, 王旭晨, . 加锚异性结构面剪切特性及声发射响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2106-2120.
[13] 马春德, 康子豪, 阳文源, 谭观霜, 赵俊康, . 不同加载速率下花岗岩多期应力记忆方向独立性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1709-1718.
[14] 唐巨鹏, 黄磊, 潘一山, 任凌冉, 张昕, 张众华, . 煤层倾角突变区煤与瓦斯突出模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1719-1730.
[15] 韩世迎, 王航龙, 彭俊, 朱君星, 王林飞, 潘堃, . 结构面影响深埋隧道硬质围岩岩爆特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1765-1776.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!