岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (9): 3187-3200.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0894CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0894

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

深埋水工隧洞排水孔堵塞演化过程与影响机制研究

木朋1, 2,龚睿1,杨逢杰3,周鑫1,朱洪泽1,苏凯1, 2   

  1. 1. 武汉大学 水资源工程与调度全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072;2. 武汉大学 水工程科学研究院,湖北 武汉 430072; 3. 广东省水利水电科学研究院,广东 广州 510610
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-21 接受日期:2025-11-27 出版日期:2026-09-11 发布日期:2026-09-01
  • 通讯作者: 苏凯,男,1977年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事水利水电与岩土工程方面的研究。E-mail: ksu@whu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:木朋,男,2001年生,硕士研究生,主要从事水工隧洞外水压力方面的研究工作。E-mail: pengmu@whu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    西藏自治区清洁能源科技重大专项(No.XZ202201ZD0003G)。

Evolution process and impact mechanism of drainage hole blockage in deep-buried hydraulic tunnels

MU Peng1, 2, GONG Rui1, YANG Feng-jie3, ZHOU Xin1, ZHU Hong-ze1, SU Kai1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 2. Institute of Water Engineering Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 3. Guangdong Research Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510610, China
  • Received:2025-08-21 Accepted:2025-11-27 Online:2026-09-11 Published:2026-09-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Science and Technology Major Project of Xizang Autonomous Region of China (XZ202201ZD0003G).

摘要: 深埋水工隧洞中排水孔堵塞会显著改变结构的孔压分布及力学响应,进而威胁隧洞稳定与服役安全。相较于现有的排水孔整体渗透系数折减法,基于线单元提出排水孔分段堵塞模拟方法,构建了深埋隧洞渗流数值模型,对比验证其适用性良好。在此基础上,采用渗流−应力间接耦合方法,建立荷载−结构模型,定量研究了排水孔堵塞空间分布情况对衬砌承载特性的影响。结果表明:衬砌水力损伤随单孔堵塞深度增加呈“缓变―陡变―稳定”三阶段特征,阈值分别为0、3.6、4.4 m;堵塞处过高的水力梯度引起衬砌压缩变形并形成反弯点,在缓变阶段末即相对堵塞深度达到0.9时,衬砌发生受拉损伤失效,受压损伤可忽略;相邻多孔堵塞使衬砌局部外水压力显著叠加,两孔相邻时峰值为3.81 MPa,间隔最远时降至2.65 MPa,局部不均匀高压梯度是导致贯通损伤的主导因素。研究成果为深埋隧洞排水系统的优化设计与安全运维提供了理论依据。

关键词: 水工隧洞, 衬砌结构, 排水孔堵塞, 渗流?应力耦合, 损伤演化, 数值模拟

Abstract:

Blockage of drainage holes in deep-buried hydraulic tunnels can significantly alter the pore-water pressure distribution and the mechanical response of the lining, thereby threatening tunnel stability and operational safety. Compared with conventional methods that represent blockage by uniformly reducing the permeability of drainage holes, this study proposes a segmented blockage modeling method based on line elements. A numerical seepage model for deep-buried tunnels is then established and validated its good applicability through comparative analyses. On this basis, an indirectly coupled seepage–stress procedure is employed to develop a load–structure model and to quantify the influence of the spatial distribution of blocked drainage holes on the load-bearing behavior of the lining. The results show that hydraulic damage in the lining induced by single-hole blockage follows a three-stage evolution: gradual change, abrupt increase, and stabilization. The corresponding critical blockage depths are 0 m, 3.6 m, and 4.4 m. Excessive hydraulic gradients near the blockage cause compressive deformation of the lining lead to the formation of an inflection point. At the end of the gradual stage, when the relative blockage depth reaches 0.9, tensile damage governs the failure of the lining, whereas compressive damage can be neglected. For adjacent multi-hole blockage, local external water pressure on the lining increases significantly, reaching a peak of approximately 3.81 MPa when two blocked holes are adjacent and decreasing to 2.65 MPa when they are widely spaced. The resulting highly non-uniform local high-pressure gradient is the dominant factor causing through-thickness damage. These findings provide a theoretical basis for optimal design, safe operation, and effective maintenance of drainage systems in deep-buried hydraulic tunnels.

Key words: hydraulic tunnel, lining structure, drain hole blockage, seepage-stress coupling, damage evolution, numerical simulation

中图分类号: TV672
[1] 申奉歧, 邱文亮, 齐琳, 邢明明, 陈胜. 多场耦合作用下裂隙岩体冻胀压力数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2866-2879.
[2] 任凌冉, 李利萍, 唐巨鹏, 潘一山, 杨松, 张昕. 瓦斯压力下构造带突出煤体损伤破裂规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2380-2395.
[3] 高峰, 陈志德, 张军辉, 马鹏飞, 郑健龙, 盛岱超. 水分入渗对青藏高原东部德马高速粉质黏土层地下冰融化影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 2201-2212.
[4] 卢巧荣, 李奇龙, 毛新莹, 周佳庆, 陈益峰. 压缩空气储能人工硐室衬砌结构优化设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 1878-1894.
[5] 李世豪, 刘杰, 王锋, 雷兵兵, 王斌. 冻融循环下土工格室加筋土挡墙水热力响应机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1713-1727.
[6] 张桂民, 孙文卿, 朱泽凡, 苏永康, 朱旭聪. 施工缝隙对压气储能硐室钢衬受力的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 485-496.
[7] 王志良, 肖智桓, 申林方, 李邵军. 基于物理信息神经网络岩石裂隙渗流传热耦合作用机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 703-716.
[8] 黄浚鸣, 赵向阳, 马洪岭, 王磊, 张佳敏. 盐穴压缩空气储能耦合沉渣储热的综合利用可行性分析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 373-382.
[9] 曹校勇, 刘瑞辉, 李建斐, 叶欣欣, 耿珺洋, 谭海星. 中硬岩地层人工地下储气硐室衬砌结构密封体系及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[10] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[11] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 刘欣宇, 李亚博. 含水率和剪切速率对黏性滑带土剪切行为及损伤演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2471-2482.
[12] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[13] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[14] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[15] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!