岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8): 2798-2809.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0958CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0958

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

深部高地应力区金属矿山采场顶板变形机制

邓融宁,林宇亮,朱前龙,马野   

  1. 中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410075
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-08 接受日期:2025-12-28 出版日期:2026-08-11 发布日期:2026-08-18
  • 通讯作者: 林宇亮,男,1985年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事边坡与支挡结构、岩土地震工程、膨胀土处治、隧道与地下工程等研究。 E-mail: linyuliang11@csu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:邓融宁,男,1991年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土力学、岩土工程、地下工程方面的研究。E-mail: dengrongning@csu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项(No. 2024ZD1003701)

Mechanism of stope roof deformation in deep metal mines under high geostress conditions

DENG Rong-ning, LIN Yu-liang, ZHU Qian-long, MA Ye   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China
  • Received:2025-09-08 Accepted:2025-12-28 Online:2026-08-11 Published:2026-08-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (2024ZD1003701).

摘要: 针对深部高地应力区金属矿山采场顶板稳定性问题,以我国某矿区为工程背景,基于弹性力学理论,建立考虑侧向围压(围岩压力)的顶板挠曲耦合模型,推导了顶板挠曲方程及最大挠度解析解。通过开展系统的正交试验与参数敏感性分析,揭示了采场顶板跨度、厚度、弹性模量及侧向压力系数等多因素耦合作用下的采场顶板变形规律。结果表明:侧向围压通过P-效应(P为顶板轴向压力,为顶板横向挠度)对顶板挠度的附加增大效应相对有限(工程实例中挠度仅增加0.74%),但其影响程度随顶板刚度退化而显著增强;极差分析显示,顶板跨度(极差146.6~294.8 mm)和厚度(极差129.0~260.1 mm)是控制变形的关键因素,其敏感性显著高于弹性模量和侧向压力系数;基于参数敏感性提出了工程优化设计准则,即当埋深为1 000~2 000 m时,应优先控制采场跨度B≤32 m与顶板厚度a≥5 m,并对低弹性模量岩层(E<100 GPa)采取强化支护措施。研究成果为深部金属矿山采场设计安全性提供理论依据和方法支撑。

关键词: 采场变形, 深埋金属矿山, 顶板变形, 弹性理论, 高地应力, 岩体力学

Abstract: To address the stability issues of stope roof in deep metal mines under high-stress conditions, this study establishes a coupled roof deflection model incorporating lateral confining pressure (surrounding rock pressure) based on elastic theory, using a mining area in China as the engineering context. Subsequently, the analytical solutions for roof deflection equations and maximum deflection are derived. Through systematic orthogonal experiments and parametric sensitivity analysis, the deformation behavior of stope roof is unveiled under the coupled effects of multiple factors, including roof span, thickness, elastic modulus, and lateral pressure coefficient. The results indicate that the additional amplification effect of lateral confining pressure on roof deflection via the P- effect (where P denotes the axial pressure on the roof, and  denotes the lateral deflection of roof) is relatively limited (just a 0.74% deflection increase in the case study). However, but its impact escalates with the degradation of roof stiffness. Range analysis reveals that roof span (ranging from 146.6 to 294.8 mm) and thickness (ranging from 129.0 to 260.1 mm) are the dominant control factors, with markedly higher sensitivity than elastic modulus and lateral pressure coefficient. Based on parameter sensitivity, an engineering optimization design criterion is proposed: when the burial depth is between 1 000 and 2 000 m, priority should be given to controlling stope span (B≤32 m) and roof thickness (a ≥ 5 m), and reinforcement support measures should be taken for low elastic modulus rock strata (E <100 GPa). The research outcomes provide theoretical foundation and methodological support for safety design in deep metal mine stopes.

Key words: mine deformation, deeply buried metal mines, roof deformation, elastic theory, high geostress, rock mechanics

中图分类号: TD 327;TU 454
[1] 蔡玉娟, 蔡静森, 任少文, 刘锴, 陈劲, 李漪, . 岩溶区非均质岩组岩体力学参数快速估计方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2749-2762.
[2] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[3] 莫云, 胡新丽, 崔德山, 顾东明, 谢昭宇, 杨勇, . 砂化白云岩Hoek-Brown准则参数取值方法研究及其岩体力学参数估算[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 257-265.
[4] 张佳威, 崔臻, 张翔宇, 曹俊, . 高地应力环境下跨活断层隧道抗错断铰接设计试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3333-3344.
[5] 段淑倩, 高坡, 江权, 周扬一, 徐鼎平. 高地应力卸荷条件下错动带塑性变形 规律与硬化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 97-109.
[6] 杨军, 魏庆龙, 王亚军, 高玉兵, 侯世林, 乔博文, . 切顶卸压无煤柱自成巷顶板变形 机制及控制对策研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 989-998.
[7] 裴书锋, 赵金帅, 于怀昌, 刘国锋, 夏跃林, 张頔, 徐进鹏, . 考虑洞室岩体应力型破坏特征的局部地应力反演方法及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 4093-4104.
[8] 陈卫忠, 田 云, 王学海, 田洪铭, 曹怀轩, 谢华东, . 基于修正[BQ]值的软岩隧道挤压变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3125-3134.
[9] 李深圳, 沙 鹏, 伍法权, 伍 劼. 层状结构岩体变形的各向异性特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 366-373.
[10] 崔光耀, 祁家所, 王明胜, . 片理化玄武岩隧道围岩大变形控制现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 231-237.
[11] 姜光成,胡乃联,洪根意,李国清,方京珍,. 基于GSI值量化和修正方法的岩体力学参数确定[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2211-2218.
[12] 张建海,王仁坤,周 钟,郑 路,张 茹,谢和平, . 高地应力地下厂房预应力锚索预紧系数[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1002-1008.
[13] 倪卫达,单治钢,刘 晓,. 基于三维节理网络模拟的坝基岩体结构分类研究[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 287-296.
[14] 王志刚,郭晓菲. 双河煤矿采动巷道顶板裂隙的分形研究[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2377-2384.
[15] 范 勇,卢文波 ,周宜红,冷振东,严 鹏,. 一种高地应力条件下爆破开挖诱发振动峰值的预测模型[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1082-1088.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!