岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8): 2720-2732.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0967CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0967

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

地形起伏对滑坡-碎屑流运动和堆积形态影响

毕晖1,江兴元1, 2,赵荣乾1,邓志南1   

  1. 1. 贵州大学 资源与环境工程学院,贵州 贵阳 550025;2. 贵州大学 喀斯特地质资源与环境教育部重点实验室,贵州 贵阳 550025
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-10 接受日期:2026-04-13 出版日期:2026-08-11 发布日期:2026-08-17
  • 通讯作者: 江兴元,男,1986年生,博士,副教授,主要从事地质灾害评价与防治方面的研究。E-mail: xyjiang3@gzu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:毕晖,男,2001年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩石力学与地质灾害方面的研究。E-mail: 874502906@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金(No. 420072710);国家自然科学基金(No. 42367023);贵州省科技支撑计划项目(黔科合支撑[2023]一般119);基础研究计划(自然科学)重点项目(黔科合基础-ZK[2025]重点007)。

Impact of topographic undulations on landslide-debris flow movement and deposition patterns

BI Hui1, JIANG Xing-yuan1, 2, ZHAO Rong-qian1, DENG Zhi-nan1   

  1. 1. School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Karst Geological Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025, China
  • Received:2025-09-10 Accepted:2026-04-13 Online:2026-08-11 Published:2026-08-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Youth Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China (420072710), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42367023), the Guizhou Science and Technology Support Program Project (Guizhou Science and Technology Cooperation Support [2023] General 119) and the Key Project of Basic Research Plan (Natural Science) (Guozhou Science and Technology Cooperation Basic-ZK [2025] Key 007).

摘要: 滑坡-碎屑流具有高速、远程和高能量特征,致灾性强,其运动过程与堆积形态受地形起伏影响显著,但现有研究对其如何调控动力学机制仍显不足。通过滑槽物理模型,设置8、15、25 cm三类地形障碍高度,系统开展28组不同体积(6.76×103~2.50×104 cm3)与粒径(0.4~3.0 cm)的碎屑流试验,为复杂地形下碎屑流成灾机制分析提供了理论依据。试验表明,8 cm低地形起伏可引发颗粒抛射与二次加速,但波动剧烈,25 cm高地形起伏滞留颗粒,使能量耗散率提升至91%~96%,显著抑制运动。碎屑流颗粒体积增大,虽增强初始动能,但内部摩擦加剧导致颗粒运动能力下降,粒径增大则通过降低摩擦耗能提升流动性,使其扩散范围扩展,大粒径对地形起伏因流态特殊受地形起伏影响较大。弗劳德数(Fr<0.8)与质心位移分析表明,碎屑流处于缓流状态,地形起伏通过惯性力与阻力相互作用主导能量分配。本研究定量揭示了地形-颗粒-体积的协同调控机制,为高山峡谷区碎屑流灾害的风险预测提供了理论依据。

关键词: 滑坡-碎屑流, 运动过程, 堆积形态, 地形起伏, 滑槽试验

Abstract: Landslide-debris flows are characterized by high speed, long travel distance, and high energy, making them highly destructive. Their movement process and deposition patterns are significantly influenced by terrain undulations, but existing studies still lack sufficient understanding of how these factors regulate the kinetic mechanisms. This study systematically conducted 28 sets of debris flow experiments with different volumes (6.76×103−2.50×104 cm3) and particle sizes (0.4−3.0 cm) using a chute physical model, setting three types of terrain obstacle heights: 8 cm, 15 cm, and 25 cm. These experiments provides a theoretical basis for analyzing debris flow disaster mechanisms in complex terrain. The experiments show that low terrain undulations of 8 cm can trigger particle ejection and secondary acceleration, but with significant fluctuations, while high terrain undulations of 25 cm retain particles, increasing the energy dissipation rate to 91%−96% and significantly inhibiting motion. As particle volume increases, the initial kinetic energy is enhanced, but increased internal friction reduces particle mobility. Larger particle sizes reduce frictional energy loss and enhance fluidity, extending the flow range, and due to their specific flow characteristics, large particles are more influenced by terrain undulations. Analysis of Froude numbers (Fr<0.8) and centroid displacement indicates that the debris flow is in a slow flow state, and terrain undulations dominate energy distribution through the interplay of inertial force and resistance. This study quantitatively reveals the synergistic regulation mechanism of terrain–particle–volume, providing a theoretical basis for risk prediction of debris flow disasters in high mountain canyon areas.

Key words: landslide-debris flows, movement process, deposition patterns, terrain undulation, chute experiment

中图分类号: TU 42
[1] 郑光, 许强, 彭双麒. 岩质滑坡−碎屑流的运动距离计算公式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4897-4906.
[2] 雷先顺,朱大勇,刘 诚,卢坤林,陈菊香, . 考虑滑道坡度和宽度的滑坡模型试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1281-1288.
[3] 杜国梁,张永双,姚 鑫,郭长宝,杨志华|. 都江堰市五里坡高位滑坡-碎屑流成因机制分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 493-501.
[4] 许 波,谢谟文,胡 嫚,. 基于GIS空间数据的滑坡SPH粒子模型研究[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2696-2705.
[5] 王忠福 ,何思明 ,李秀珍,. 西藏樟木后山危岩崩塌颗粒离散元数值分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 399-406.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!