岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10): 3575-3588.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.1155CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.1155

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于多保真网络的数据-物理融合驱动岩土结构 变形预测:以太湖隧道深基坑为例

王斌1, 2,傅辰宇1, 2,谭旭燕1, 2,李洋3,沙汝晨3   

  1. 1.中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程安全全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉,430071; 2.中国科学院大学,北京100049;3.中国建设基础设施有限公司,北京100029
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-25 接受日期:2026-03-25 出版日期:2026-10-10 发布日期:2026-10-09
  • 作者简介:王斌,男,1989年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事岩土计算力学与试验技术方面的研究工作。E-mail: bwang@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52379111,No.52579111);中国科学院青年人才引进项目。

Data-physics fusion-driven deformation prediction of geotechnical structures based on multi-fidelity networks: a case study of the Taihu Tunnel deep excavation

WANG Bin1, 2, FU Chen-yu1, 2, TAN Xu-yan1, 2, LI Yang3, SHA Ru-chen3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. China Construction Infrastructure Co., Ltd., Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2025-10-25 Accepted:2026-03-25 Online:2026-10-10 Published:2026-10-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52379111, 52579111) and the Overseas Recruiting Program for Outstanding Young Scientists of CAS.

摘要: 变形是岩土结构稳定性评价的重要指标之一,例如深基坑围护结构的变形、盾构隧道的管片收敛变形等。针对传统岩土结构变形预测方法多以数据驱动为核心、高度依赖数据质量与数量这一工程与技术问题,提出了一种基于多保真网络的物理-数据双驱动预测框架。该框架包括两个模块,首先以深度算子学习网络(deep operator network,简称DeepONet)为基本架构构建低保真子网,挖掘数值仿真结果中包含的基本变形特征,提取结构变形的物理模式;然后构建基于残差的高保真子网,在子网的输入、输出端显式关联高、低保真数据,并以长短时记忆(long short-term memory,简称LSTM)神经网络为基本架构,实现物理引导的数据驱动,以此达到低保真解对高保真预测结果的引导与校正。该框架通过嵌入物理范式有效约束了数据模型的训练,降低了模型对纯数据的依赖,克服了数据质量的掣肘。最后将本框架在太湖隧道深基坑工程中进行了应用。结果表明,嵌入物理机制的双驱动方法预测精度显著高于单一数据驱动方法,两次预测任务所得结果的平均决定系数R2分别为0.93与0.96,相对于单一数据驱动方法分别提高了0.37与0.035;平均绝对误差MAE的平均值分别为0.265与0.21,相对降低了28%与27%;均方误差MSE的平均值分别为0.125与0.083,相对降低了84%与47%。

关键词: 岩土结构, 深基坑, 变形预测, 数据-物理融合驱动, 多保真方法

Abstract: Deformation serves as a pivotal indicator for the stability assessment of geotechnical structures, as exemplified by the deflection of deep excavation retaining systems and the convergence of shield tunnel segments. Addressing the limitation that conventional deformation prediction methodologies are predominantly data-driven—heavily contingent upon the quantity and fidelity of available data—we propose a physics-data dual-driven prediction framework anchored in multi-fidelity networks. The framework comprises two distinct modules. Initially, a low-fidelity sub-network is constructed utilizing the deep operator network (DeepONet) architecture, designed to mine fundamental deformation characteristics inherent in numerical simulation results and extract the physical modes of structural deformation. Subsequently, a residual-based high-fidelity sub-network is established, wherein high- and low-fidelity data are explicitly correlated at the input and output interfaces. Employing a long short-term memory (LSTM) architecture, this module realizes a physics-guided data-driven approach, whereby the low-fidelity solution provides guidance and correction to the high-fidelity prediction. By embedding physical paradigms, the framework effectively constrains the training of the data model, thereby mitigating the reliance on purely empirical data and surmounting the limitations imposed by data quality. Finally, the proposed framework is applied to the Taihu Tunnel deep excavation project. The results demonstrate that the predictive accuracy of the physics-embedded dual-driven methodology is significantly superior to that of a singular data-driven approach. For the two prediction tasks, the mean scores are 0.93 and 0.96, representing improvements of 0.37 and 0.035, respectively, relative to the single data-driven method; the mean MAEs are recorded at 0.265 and 0.21, corresponding to reductions of 28% and 27%; and the mean MSEs are 0.125 and 0.083, indicating substantial reductions of 84% and 47%.

Key words: geotechnical structures, deep foundation pit, deformation prediction, physics-data fusion-driven, multi-fidelity methods

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 魏星, 陈睿, 程世涛, 朱明, 王子健, . 成都膨胀土地区深基坑降雨稳定性分析与变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 525-534.
[2] 李涛, 舒佳军, 王彦龙, 陈前. 基于模态分解方法的深基坑支护桩水平变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 496-506.
[3] 肖荣军, 马威, 李锋, 袁丽云. 一种深基坑排桩支护结构内力位移矩阵分析法 解答及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 579-595.
[4] THENDAR Yoshua, LIM Aswin. 考虑地下连续墙接缝的深基坑RFD系统研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3717-3727.
[5] 陈保国, 贾曾潘. 近接建筑荷载作用下阳角型深基坑最佳支撑位置[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2400-2408.
[6] HANIFAH Hermil Rizki, RAHARDJO Paulus Pramono, LIM Aswin. 砂土地层圆形深基坑三维分析与测斜仪测量[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1142-1152.
[7] 马恩临, 赖金星, 王立新, 汪珂, 雷升祥, 李储军, 邱军领. 基于控制区间牵引算法的地下施工变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 577-594.
[8] 李瑛, 刘岸军, 刘兴旺. 考虑假想基础宽度的基坑抗隆起稳定性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2843-2850.
[9] 莫品强, 刘尧, 黄子丰, 滕鸿博, 陈斌, 陶祥令, . 复杂支护条件下深基坑支护桩−冠梁−支撑 的变形协调及空间效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2592-2601.
[10] 仉文岗, 顾鑫, 刘汉龙, 张青, 王林, 王鲁琦, . 基于贝叶斯更新的非饱和土坡参数概率 反演及变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1112-1122.
[11] 兰韡, 王卫东, 常林越, . 超大规模深基坑工程现场抽水试验及土层 变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2898-2910.
[12] 郭健, 陈健, 胡杨. 基于小波智能模型的地铁车站基坑变形 时序预测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 299-304.
[13] 王成汤, 王浩, 覃卫民, 钟国强, 陈舞, . 基于多态模糊贝叶斯网络的地铁车站 深基坑坍塌可能性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1670-1679.
[14] 陈保国, 闫腾飞, 王程鹏, 宗秋雷, . 深基坑地连墙支护体系协调变形规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3289-3299.
[15] 王忠凯, 徐光黎. 盾构掘进、离开施工阶段对地表变形的 影响范围及量化预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 285-294.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!