岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10): 3564-3574.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.1097CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.1097

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

水平排水板真空预压快速加固疏浚淤泥作填料的现场试验与数值研究

宋丁豹1, 2,吴沛琛2,陈文博1,殷建华1, 2   

  1. 1.深圳大学 土木与交通工程学院,广东 深圳,518060;2.香港理工大学 土木与环境工程学系,香港 999077
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-13 接受日期:2026-01-26 出版日期:2026-10-10 发布日期:2026-10-09
  • 通讯作者: 陈文博,男,1992年生,博士,特聘教授,主要从事低碳岩土体加固、交通岩土工程、人工智能在岩土工程应用等方面的研究教学。 E-mail: wenbochen@szu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:宋丁豹,男,1990年生,博士,博士后,主要从事超软土加固处理与利用、填埋结构-土体相互作用等方面的研究。E-mail: dingbao_song@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.52578418);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(No.2025A1515011924);大学教育资助委员会研究资助局优配研究金(No.15226722)。

Field experiment and numerical study on rapid consolidation of dredged slurry as fill material using prefabricated horizontal drain vacuum preloading

SONG Ding-bao1, 2, WU Pei-chen2, CHEN Wen-bo1, YIN Jian-hua1, 2   

  1. 1. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518060, China; 2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China
  • Received:2025-10-13 Accepted:2026-01-26 Online:2026-10-10 Published:2026-10-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (52578418), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Fund (2025A1515011924) and the General Research Fund of University Grants Committee (15226722).

摘要: 现有模型试验研究表明,水平排水板(prefabricated horizontal drain,简称PHD)真空预压法在加固处理高含水率疏浚淤泥方面潜力显著。但目前尚缺乏对该方法实际工程效果的系统性研究,相关现场试验的报道也有限。对此,开展了一项使用PHD真空预压法快速加固海相疏浚沉积物作填料的现场试验,系统评估了该方法的处理效率和加固效果。同时,对该现场试验进行了数值建模分析,验证了数值模型的适用性和准确性,并基于参数敏感性分析,提出了适用不同性质淤泥的关键设计参数建议范围,包括排水板水平间距和竖向层间距。研究进一步对比了多种方法处理疏浚淤泥的效能,结果表明,PHD真空预压法通过更早介入真空预压过程,从而显著提高固结加固效率和效果。对于高压缩性、高初始孔隙比淤泥的处理,建议将排水板水平间距参数(水平间距与排水板宽度的比值)设置为5~8,层间距参数(层间距与淤泥总初始厚度的比值)设置在0.1~0.3范围内。

关键词: 疏浚淤泥, 水平排水板(PHD), 真空固结, 现场试验, 数值分析

Abstract: Existing laboratory model tests evidence that the prefabricated horizontal drain (PHD) vacuum preloading method exhibits significant potential for consolidating dredged slurry with high water content. However, systematic research on the practical engineering effectiveness of this method remains limited, with few related reports. To address this, a field experiment was conducted to rapidly consolidate marine dredged sediments used as fill material, employing the PHD vacuum preloading method. The experiment systematically evaluated the method’s treatment efficiency and effectiveness. Additionally, numerical modeling analysis was performed to validate the applicability and accuracy of the numerical model. Based on parameter sensitivity analysis, recommended ranges for key design parameters, including the horizontal spacing of drains and vertical layer spacing, were proposed for slurry with varying properties. Furthermore, a comparative analysis of multiple methods for treating dredged slurry was conducted, demonstrating that the PHD vacuum preloading method significantly enhances drainage consolidation efficiency. Early implementation of the vacuum preloading process was found to substantially improve consolidation effectiveness. For the treatment of high-compressibility soil slurry with a high initial void ratio, it is recommended that the horizontal spacing parameter of the drains (defined as the ratio of the horizontal spacing to the width of the drain) be set in the range of 5–8, and that the interlayer spacing parameter (defined as the ratio of the interlayer spacing to the total initial thickness of the slurry) be set within 0.1–0.3.

Key words: dredged soil slurry, prefabricated horizontal drain (PHD), vacuum consolidation, field experiment, numerical analysis

中图分类号: TU 447
[1] 邓其宁, 崔玉龙, 王炯超, 郑俊, 许冲, . 三维边坡稳定性计算的ChatGPT辅助编程方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[2] 聂庆科, 张海清, 杨海朋, 贾向新, 张日华. 赤泥−粉煤灰地聚物桩的开发与现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3683-3693.
[3] 童森杰, 黄茂松, 时振昊, 王滨. 砂土全应变范围非线性特性对贯入大变形问题的影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3707-3714.
[4] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[5] 吴迪, 陈嵘, 孔纲强, 牛庚, 缪玉松, 王振兴. 冷-热循环温度下桥梁能量排桩热-力响应特性现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[6] 孙宏磊, 徐振恺, 刘斯杰, 蔡袁强, . 考虑土柱发展过程的淤泥真空预压大应变固结计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 133-146.
[7] 曾二贤, 程述一, 伍林伟, 陈成, 吏垚, 刘观仕, . 土-岩组合地基变截面锚杆承载性能与机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2117-2128.
[8] 冉逸涵, 肖世国, 廖家前, 王础, . 土-石混合填土强夯动应力的简化与修正算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1121-1128.
[9] 文磊, 刘 钟, 马晓华, 张振. 粉土地基中劲性复合桩抗压承载特性与荷载传递机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 511-524.
[10] 陈慧芸, 冯忠居, 白少奋, 董建松, 夏承明, 蔡杰, . 桥梁桩基穿越溶洞的荷载传递机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1405-1415.
[11] 胡利文, 洪义, 王德咏, . 水下双面真空预压离心模型试验及数值模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 3059-3070.
[12] 金佳旭, 朱磊, 刘磊, 陈亿军, 姚远, 高腾飞, 李若欣, . 填埋场单井注气气体压力监测试验及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 259-267.
[13] Muhammad Usman Azhar, 周 辉, 杨凡杰, 高阳, 朱勇, 路新景, 房后国, 耿轶君, . 软弱泥质砂岩地层中输水隧洞稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 626-639.
[14] 李双龙, 魏丽敏, 冯胜洋, 何群, 张开鑫, . 基于扩展Koppejan模型的被动桩−软土 时效性相互作用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2602-2614.
[15] 乔亚飞, 唐洁, 顾贇, 丁文其, . 超深地连墙槽壁侧压力演变模式 及其施工扰动分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1083-1092.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!