岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10): 3551-3563.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.1139CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.1139

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

冻融固化有机质土强度损伤及细观机制分析

赵记领1, 2, 3,杨平2,潘卫东4,郭文兵1,芮大虎5,张军5   

  1. 1.河南理工大学 能源科学与工程学院,河南 焦作 454003;2.南京林业大学 土木工程学院,江苏 南京 210037; 3.河南理工大学 河南省煤矿岩层控制国际联合实验室,河南 焦作 454003;4.郑州交通发展投资集团有限公司,河南 郑州450000; 5.河南理工大学 土木工程学院,河南 焦作 454003
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-24 接受日期:2026-01-27 出版日期:2026-10-10 发布日期:2026-10-09
  • 通讯作者: 杨平,男,1964年生,硕士,教授,主要从事岩土与地下工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: yangping@njfu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:赵记领,男,1991年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩土与地下工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: zhaojiling@hpu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    河南省高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No.NSFRF2602006);国家自然科学基金(No.52178337);河南省国际科技合作重点项目(No.251111521200);焦作市科技计划项目(NO.2025410003)。

Strength damage and mesoscopic mechanism of stabilized organic soil subjected to freeze-thaw cycles

ZHAO Ji-ling1, 2, 3, YANG Ping2, PAN Wei-dong4, GUO Wen-bing1, RUI Da-hu5, ZHANG Jun5   

  1. 1. School of Energy Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454003, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210037, China; 3. Henan International Joint Laboratory of Coalmine Ground Control, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454003, China; 4. Zhengzhou Transportation Development Investment Group Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China; 5. School of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454003, China
  • Received:2025-10-24 Accepted:2026-01-27 Online:2026-10-10 Published:2026-10-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Universities of Henan Province (NSFRF2602006), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52178337), the Key Project of International Science and Technology Cooperation of Henan Province (251111521200) and the Jiaozuo City Science and Technology Planning Project (2025410003).

摘要: 有机质土在寒区分布广泛,其工程性质受冻融循环影响显著,直接关系到寒区路基长期稳定性。然而,现有研究多集中于普通土体,对于水泥-粉煤灰固化有机质土(简称固化有机质土)在冻融循环作用下的宏观力学响应与细观损伤机制尚不明确。通过三轴剪切与计算机断层扫描(computed tomography,简称CT)试验,揭示了固化有机质土在冻融循环下的宏-细观损伤规律。研究结果表明,水泥掺入比20%+粉煤灰5%在提高强度方面为最优配比;有机质含量≥15%时,固化有机质土由脆性向塑性过渡;冻融作用使强度以幂函数形式衰减;孔隙率随冻融次数呈对数增长,孔隙形态趋于狭长化。构建了同时考虑冻融循环次数与基于分形维数修正的细观损伤因子的本构模型;进而实现了宏-细观损伤的定量关联,揭示了其内在冻融损伤机制。研究成果可为寒区固化有机质土路基设计与耐久性评估提供参数与理论依据。

关键词: 强度, 细观, 损伤, 冻融循环, 固化有机质土

Abstract: Organic soils are widely distributed in cold regions, where their engineering properties are significantly influenced by F-T (freeze-thaw) cycles, which directly influence the long-term stability of subgrade in cold areas. While existing research has predominantly focused on conventional soils, the macro-meso response mechanisms of cement-and-fly ash stabilized organic soils under F-T cycles remain unclear. This study investigates the macro-mesoscopic damage evolution of stabilized organic soils subjected to F-T cycles through triaxial shear tests and computed tomography (CT) scanning. The results indicate that a mix proportion of 20% cement and 5% fly ash yields the optimal strength enhancement. When the organic content reaches or exceeds 15%, the failure mode of stabilized organic soils transitions from brittle to ductile. The strength deteriorates in a power-law function with increasing F-T cycles, while porosity increases logarithmically, accompanied by a tendency for pore morphology to become more elongated and narrow. A constitutive model incorporating both the number of F-T cycles and a mesoscopic damage factor modified by fractal dimension is developed. This model quantitatively correlates macro- and mesoscopic damage, elucidating the underlying damage mechanisms induced by F-T actions. The findings provide critical parameters and a theoretical basis for the design and durability assessment of stabilized organic soil subgrade in cold regions.

Key words: strength, mesostructure, damage, freeze-thaw cycles, stabilized organic soil

中图分类号: TU 456
[1] 李志杰, 储亚, 蔡国军, 陈熠坤, 闫超, 刘松玉. 基于电阻率的人工冻土强度特性评价研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(9): 2938-2952.
[2] 木朋, 龚睿, 杨逢杰, 周鑫, 朱洪泽, 苏凯. 深埋水工隧洞排水孔堵塞演化过程与影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(9): 3187-3200.
[3] 丁杰, 任鹏山, 吴少培, 李得洋, 刘志发, 李国芳. 温度荷载引发的无砟轨道结构损伤变形及车-轨动力响应分析 [J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(9): 3248-3260.
[4] 吴京戎, 雷俊强, 刘学伟, 刘滨, 周哲, 罗旭峰. 基于随钻参数的岩石抗压强度物理信息神经网络预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(9): 3261-3275.
[5] 余梦飞, 吴春平, 徐泽辉, 崔新男, 黄磊, 刘创. 爆破作用下砾岩的动态响应及损伤机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2810-2823.
[6] 任凌冉, 李利萍, 唐巨鹏, 潘一山, 杨松, 张昕. 瓦斯压力下构造带突出煤体损伤破裂规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2380-2395.
[7] 罗璟, 刘卓, 裴向军. 近断层速度脉冲型地震动作用下岩质斜坡动力响应特征与坡向效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2449-2460.
[8] 刘杰, 乔志存, 杨渝南, 黎照, 莫承林, 鲍晓鹏, 蔡铭阳. 改性水泥基磁性浆液及磁注浆突水封堵研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2248-2260.
[9] 段国勇, 赵中艳, 李建林, 邓华锋, 王彦海. 不同幅值循环动剪切作用下节理损伤特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2298-2310.
[10] 张晶, 韩岩松, 周宗红, 刘海, 欧阳治华. 考虑岩石临界围压效应的真三轴Hoek-Brown准则改进[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2337-2346.
[11] 徐晨, 邓兴富, 程丽娟, 夏才初. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的压气储能洞室围岩非线性力学响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 1865-1877.
[12] 夏敏, 李泓霖, 常朝凯, 黄琦. 冻融循环对泥炭土力学特性及微观结构演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 1929-1940.
[13] 白欣悦, 郑俊杰, 章荣军, 刘斯杰. 考虑预压压力的理化复合法处理流泥的强度发展模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 1952-1960.
[14] 邹高威, 王子帅, 王东星, 史宇豪. 碱性固废增强水泥流态固化有机质土效能与机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1645-1658.
[15] 李金秋, 张永双, 张真源, 任三绍, 崔臻. 蚀变黏土夹层对岩体结构面强度影响的力学机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1699-1712.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!