岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 185-193.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2192

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

增压式真空预压吹填淤泥孔压 实时响应及加固机制初探

史吏1,胡东东1,蔡袁强1,潘晓东1,孙宏磊2   

  1. 1. 浙江工业大学 建筑工程学院,浙江 杭州 310014;2. 浙江大学 建筑工程学院,浙江 杭州 310058
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-03 修回日期:2019-05-14 出版日期:2020-01-13 发布日期:2020-01-05
  • 作者简介:史吏,男,1987年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土工程等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No.2016YFC0800200);国家自然科学基金(No.51620105008,No.51608482,No.51879234);浙江省重点研发计划(No.2018C03038)

Preliminary study of real-time pore water pressure response and reinforcement mechanism of air-booster vacuum preloading treated dredged slurry

SHI Li1, HU Dong-dong1, CAI Yuan-qiang1, PAN Xiao-dong1, SUN Hong-lei2   

  1. 1. Department of Architecture Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310014, China; 2. Department of Architecture Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
  • Received:2018-12-03 Revised:2019-05-14 Online:2020-01-13 Published:2020-01-05
  • About author:SHI Li, male, (1987-), PhD, associate Professor, Research interest: geotechnical engineering.
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0800200), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51620105008, 51608482, 51879234) and the Key R&D Program of Zhejiang Province(2018C03038).

摘要: 进行了增压式真空预压处理吹填淤泥的室内模型试验,利用沉降标、微型孔压计和微型十字板剪切仪对试验过程中的土体沉降量、孔压消散以及强度进行监测。结果表明,土体内部注气增压对土体沉降量、孔压累积消散量以及强度提升均有明显促进作用。特别地,获得了增压期间土体孔压的实时响应,并结合数值模拟分析,推断了增压提升淤泥地基处理效果的主要机制为:注气引起增压管/排水板之间土体产生微小的劈裂裂缝,提高了土体的渗透性,并且该裂缝在增压结束后继续提供额外的排水通道,从而在增压后仍能加快孔压消散和土体固结。

关键词: 增压, 真空预压, 加固效果, 加固机制

Abstract: Laboratory tests have been carried out for simulating dredged-slurry treatment combining air-booster and conventional vacuum preloading methods. Settlement plate, micro pore water pressure transducer and miniature vane shearing instrument are adopted for monitoring the settlement, the pore pressure dissipation and the soil strength during the test. The test results demonstrate that the air-booster vacuum-preloading method can significantly improve the soil strength, pore-water pressure dissipation and settlement. In particular, the real-time responses of pore-water pressure during the air-pressurizing process have been obtained that, in combination with the numerical simulations, help derive the reinforcement mechanism of the air-booster vacuum preloading method, which involves using micro cracks generated by splitting soil between the booster tube and PVD using the pressurised air. Those cracks improve the soil permeability, and have lasting effect even after air pressuring ceased.

Key words: air pressurizing, vacuum preloading, reinforcement effect, reinforcement mechanism

中图分类号: TU 470
[1] 童佳荣, 张曙, 李荣, 夏彬桐, 王宁伟, . 电动化学加固技术对珠海软土改性的机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 262-270.
[2] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[3] 杨少朋, 杨爱武, 许福军, . 改性纤维排水板真空预压加固吹填软土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 789-797.
[4] 赵飞, 石振明, 俞松波, 周圆媛, 李博, 陈建峰, 张清照, 郑鸿超. 层状岩质边坡动力失稳及加固研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3585-3614.
[5] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[6] 孙宏磊, 徐振恺, 刘斯杰, 蔡袁强, . 考虑土柱发展过程的淤泥真空预压大应变固结计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 133-146.
[7] 崔凯, 于翔鹏, 吴国鹏, 许鹏飞, 葛诚瑞, . 桩-浆联合模式下土遗址裂隙注浆加固机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 607-618.
[8] 崔允亮, 潘方然, 高楥园, 金子原, . 真空预压淤堵区渗透系数的计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2085-2093.
[9] 刘景锦, 罗学思, 雷华阳, 郑刚, 罗昊鹏, . 等应变条件下增压式真空预压固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 809-821.
[10] 胡利文, 洪义, 王德咏, . 水下双面真空预压离心模型试验及数值模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 3059-3070.
[11] 张雷, 吕延栋, 王炳辉, 金丹丹, 竺明星, 方晨, . 絮凝−真空−电渗联合加固滩涂软土的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2383-2390.
[12] 雷华阳, 王磊, 刘景锦, 王鹏, 章纬地, 薄钰, . 化学改性联合真空预压法加固吹填土试验分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 891-900.
[13] 朱永建, 任恒, 王平, 李鹏, 王希之, 魏明星, . 含单一贯通破裂面岩石注浆试验及加固机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3221-3230.
[14] 杨佳乐, 李双洋, 刘德仁, 王旭, 朱怀太, 徐硕昌, . 絮凝−电渗法联合治理淤泥质土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2861-2872.
[15] 李长辉, 武航, 程国勇, 陈宇, 金敏, 常雷, . 不同排水板真空预压软土加固对比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2819-2827.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!