岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 278-284.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2159

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

抗滑桩受荷段前侧有限范围地层的 地基抗力系数取值方法

孙来宾1,肖世国1, 2   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学 地质工程系,四川 成都 610031;2. 西南交通大学 高速铁路线路工程教育部重点实验室,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-28 修回日期:2019-04-28 出版日期:2020-01-13 发布日期:2020-01-05
  • 通讯作者: 肖世国,男,1973年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事边坡稳定性与支挡结构方面的研究。E-mail: xiaoshiguo@swjtu.cn E-mail:278405498@qq.com
  • 作者简介:孙来宾,男,1993年生,硕士研究生,主要从事边坡支挡结构方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51578466)

Evaluation method for elastic foundation coefficient of finite downslope soil against loading segment of stabilizing piles

SUN Lai-bin1, XIAO Shi-guo1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Geological Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. Key Laboratory of High-speed Railway Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2018-11-28 Revised:2019-04-28 Online:2020-01-13 Published:2020-01-05
  • About author:First author: SUN Lai-bin, male, (1993-), Master candidate, majored in slope retaining structures. E-mail: 278405498@qq.com Corresponding author: XIAO Shi-guo, male, (1973-), PhD, Professor, doctoral supervisor, mainly engaged in the study of slope stability and retaining structure. E-mail: xiaoshiguo@swjtu.cn
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51578466).

摘要: 为确定在抗滑桩受荷段前侧有限范围土体条件下地基抗力系数的取值方法,基于抗滑桩计算的侧向受荷弹性地基梁法,并结合塑性极限分析上限法,考虑全桩内力与变形连续性,且以受荷段前侧土体无限情况下的地基抗力系数的比例系数值为基准,分析推导出抗滑桩受荷段前侧有限范围土体条件下该比例系数的取值方法,得到了地基抗力系数的比例系数与受荷段前侧土体坡度之间的关系,通过数值模拟进一步验证了所提方法的合理性。针对不同土体物理力学参数和抗滑桩参数条件下的案例分析结果表明,地基抗力系数的比例系数随受荷段前侧土体坡度增加呈非线性减小,抗滑桩嵌固段深度、截面尺寸、受荷段前侧土体黏聚力、内摩擦角和重度对桩前土体的该比例系数均有影响,但土体重度影响并不明显,而其他因素影响则呈较显著的正相关性影响。

关键词: 抗滑桩, 受荷段, 有限土体, 地基抗力系数, 极限分析

Abstract: In order to determine the evaluation method of lateral elastic foundation coefficient of the finite soil mass against the loading pile segment, based on the proportion coefficient of the foundation coefficient of the corresponding infinite soil mass, the laterally loaded beam-on-elastic-foundation method for a stabilizing pile is adopted in combination with the upper bound limit analysis method under the consideration of the internal forces and deformation continuity of the whole pile element. Thus, a calculation method for the proportion coefficient of the lateral elastic foundation coefficient of the finite soil mass is provided. The relationship between the proportion coefficient with the slope angle of the finite soil mass is determined. The proposed method is verified by numerical simulation method for a practical example. In the case of various physical and mechanical parameters of soil mass and stabilizing pile, analysis results of the example show further that the proportion coefficient decreases nonlinearly with the increase in the slope angle of the local soil. Also, the length of embedded segment (below the slip surface) and the size of cross section of stabilizing piles, cohesion, internal friction angle, and unit weight of the local soil have effects on the proportion coefficient. But the influence of the unit weight is minor, other factors have significant positive correlations with the proportion coefficient.

Key words: stabilizing pile, loading segment of a pile, finite soil mass, elastic foundation coefficient, limit analysis

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 李小刚, 武守信, 冯君, . 基于极限分析理论的悬索桥重力锚垂直齿坎抗滑力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2547-2558.
[2] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[3] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[4] 娄旭龙, 张泽瑞, 孔德琼, 陈星潮, 朱斌, . 深海重型管道管土相互作用大变形极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3234-3242.
[5] 张振波, 李秉欣, 杨茜, 刘志春, 刘义, . 近接基坑工程有限土体失稳模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 266-277.
[6] 宋丽, 许领, 李杭州, 李伟, . 考虑中间主应力影响的非饱和黄土边坡抗滑桩间距研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 517-524.
[7] 雷国平, 吴泽雄, 苏栋, 莫烨强, 程马遥, . 考虑桩身材料非线性的微型抗滑桩计算p-y[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 337-348.
[8] 刘志春, 马博, 胡指南, 张振波, 杜孔泽, . 邻近地下结构基坑主动土压力分布规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 33-41.
[9] 戴北冰, 袁新, 周锡文, 刘锋涛, . 考虑间断速度场的光滑有限元极限分析上限法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2849-2858.
[10] 石修松, 周高涨, 刘磊磊, . 基于非线性Hvorslev面的超固结土层隧道掌子面稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2595-2610.
[11] 朱丹, 蒋关鲁, 陈虹羽, 赵鑫辉, 黄德贵, 刘乙甫, . 单、双排桩支护路堑边坡动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[12] 孙锐, 阳军生, 张庆贺, 杨峰, . 基于网格自适应加密策略的隧道稳定性三维极限分析下限有限元法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1256-1264.
[13] 冯嵩, 郑颖人, 高红, . 岩土常规三轴Drucker-Prager准则[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2919-2928.
[14] 朱克文, 俞剑, 黄茂松, . 饱和黏土中抗拔桩上限承载力分析及土塞效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1995-2004.
[15] 张治国, 毛敏东, 朱正国, 赵其华, 吴钟腾, . 间歇性强降雨诱发滑坡对抗滑桩非线性力学响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 2073-2094.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!