岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 3245-3254.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0026

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

废弃泥浆底部真空−上部堆载预压模型试验研究

詹良通1, 2,张斌1, 2,郭晓刚1, 2,江文豪1, 2   

  1. 1. 浙江大学 软弱土与环境土工教育部重点试验室,浙江 杭州 310058;2. 浙江大学 岩土工程研究所,浙江 杭州 310058
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-10 修回日期:2020-06-11 出版日期:2020-10-12 发布日期:2020-11-05
  • 作者简介:詹良通,男,1972年生,博士,教授,主要从事非饱和土力学与环境岩土工程的教学和科研。
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省重点研发计划项目(No. 2019C03107)

Physical modeling study on treatment of waste slurry with vacuum preloading at bottom combined with upper surcharge loading

ZHAN Liang-tong1, 2, ZHANG Bin1, 2, GUO Xiao-gang1, 2, JIANG Wen-hao1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering of Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 2. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
  • Received:2020-01-10 Revised:2020-06-11 Online:2020-10-12 Published:2020-11-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key R & D program of Zhejiang Province (2019C03107).

摘要: 针对工程泥浆回填废弃矿坑处置的安全问题,开展底部真空和上部堆载预压处理废弃工程泥浆的模型试验,探讨该技术在废弃矿坑回填处置工程应用的可行性。试验结果表明,底部真空和上部堆载预压使得泥浆含水率显著降低及泥土的强度明显提高,处理一个月后,含水率从初始450%降低至95%~105%,体积减量达到73.4%;不排水强度由初始为0的状态提高至9.8~13.4 kPa。在初始的静置阶段,泥浆颗粒沉积存在重力分异现象,粗颗粒在底部沉积有助于缓解真空预压过程中淤堵问题。底部真空作用下,泥浆中孔隙水渗流方向并非完全一维向下,在径向存在水力梯度。处理后泥土压缩性与软土相近,渗透性优于软土。基于试验结果和大应变固结理论,考虑泥浆的自重固结以及压缩性与渗透性的非线性变化,利用有限差分法分析了单次回填厚度对泥浆层固结时间和减量效果的影响,提出了现场实施的工艺参数建议。

关键词: 废弃工程泥浆, 底部真空预压, 模型试验, 固结, 泥浆减量

Abstract: To solve the safety problem of using waste slurry to backfill discarded open pit mine, the treatment method of vacuum preloading at bottom combined with upper surcharge loading is implemented in the model test. The feasibility of using this method in the backfilling of discarded open pit mine is discussed. The test results show that the proposed method can significantly reduce the water content of the slurry and increase the shear strength of the soil. The water content of the slurry reduces from 450% to 95%–105%, and the reduction of volume reaches 73.4%. The undrained shear strength increases from zero to 9.8–13.4 kPa. In the initial self-weight consolidation stage, there is gravitational separation in the deposition of particles, and the deposition of coarse particles at the bottom is helpful to alleviate the clogging problem of vacuum preloading. During the stage of vacuum preloading, seepage direction of pore water in the slurry is not completely one-dimensional downward, and there is a hydraulic gradient in the radial direction. After the treatment, the compressibility of the soil is close to that of soft clay, while the permeability is greater than that of soft clay. Based on the experimental results and the large-strain consolidation theory, the effects of slurry thickness of a single disposal cycle on volume reduction and treatment time are analyzed using the finite difference method with consideration of the self-weight, nonlinear change of compressibility and permeability of the slurry. The process parameters for operation in site are recommended based on the results of numerical analysis.

Key words: construction waste slurry, vacuum preloading at bottom, model test, consolidation, volume reduction of slurry

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 鲍树峰, 董志良, 莫海鸿, 张劲文, 于立婷, 刘攀, 刘晓强, 侯明勋, . 浮泥−流泥静态间歇沉降与低压固结沉降计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2763-2772.
[2] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[3] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[4] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[5] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[6] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[7] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[8] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[9] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[10] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[11] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[12] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[13] 周波翰, 张文利, 王栋. 球形贯入仪预测超固结土强度的数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1303-1309.
[14] 金磊, 李晶晶, 李新明, 孙翰卿, . 柔性边界的有限差分法−离散元法模拟及其对砂土三轴固结排水和不排水剪切特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 980-990.
[15] 徐斌, 陈柯好, 庞锐, . 超固结黏土的剪胀方程及边界面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 449-456.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!