岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 3333-3342.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0035

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

地热系统作用下红层软岩力学性能试验研究

周其健1, 2,马德翠3,邓荣贵1,康景文2,祝全兵4   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学 土木工程学院,四川 成都 610031;2. 中国建筑西南勘察设计研究院有限公司,四川 成都 610051; 3. 中冶成都勘察研究总院有限公司,四川 成都 610023;4. 中国水利水电第七工程局有限公司,四川 成都 610213
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-10 修回日期:2020-06-11 出版日期:2020-10-12 发布日期:2020-11-07
  • 作者简介:周其健,男,1979年生,博士研究生,高级工程师,主要从事特殊岩土体工程特性研究。
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科学技术厅资助项目(No. 2019GFW176)。

Experimental study on mechanical properties of red-layer soft rock in geothermal systems

ZHOU Qi-jian1, 2, MA De-cui3, DENG Rong-gui1, KANG Jing-wen2, ZHU Quan-bing4   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2.China Southwest Geotechnical Investigation & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610051, China; 3. Chengdu Surveying Geotechnical Research Institute Co., Ltd. of MCC, Chengdu, Sichuan 610023, China; 4. Sinohydro Bureau 7 Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610213, China
  • Received:2020-01-10 Revised:2020-06-11 Online:2020-10-12 Published:2020-11-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Science & Technology Foundation of Sichuan Province (2019GFW176).

摘要: 地热能源是目前绿色建筑的发展趋势,但红层软岩分布地区出现的系列建筑地基病害问题与地源热系统关系尚不清楚。依托成都某建筑群事故调查项目,研究了有无地热系统作用下泥岩、石膏岩的工程特性,并基于室内试验模拟,研究了不同加热方式、不同温度及不同浸水时间等因素下岩石宏观力学特性和微观结构特征。结果表明:(1)同一场地有无地热系统对岩石力学性质影响甚微,但有地热系统时岩体中裂隙发育数量明显增多,累积张开度明显增大;(2)随着浸泡时间增加,泥岩最大含水率可达30%以上,石膏岩含水率超不过15%,泥岩浸水软化效应较石膏岩显著,二者力学指标随含水率增加呈负指数型下降,石膏岩因晶粒大小不同,离散性大;(3)天然状态下石膏岩呈脆性破坏,泥岩呈延性破坏,石膏岩水岩界面溶蚀作用效应显著,随着石膏岩由表及里溶蚀加剧,温度变化效应对岩体内生裂隙萌发起一定促进作用;(4)在20~50 ℃温度变化范围内,石膏岩抗压强度随温度呈抛物线变化,而泥岩单调升高;(5)地热管与岩体间填筑不密实容易形成渗水通道,改变水动力条件,动水作用下使石膏岩裂隙及软弱夹层溶蚀加剧,形成更大空洞,从而诱发沉降。

关键词: 泥岩, 石膏岩, 地热系统, 试验研究, 建筑下沉

Abstract: Geothermal energy is the development trend of green building. However, it is not clear about the relationship between the problems of building foundation impairment and the geothermal system in red-layer soft rock areas. Based on an accident investigation project of building clusters in Chengdu, the engineering characteristics of mudstone and gypsum rock with or without geothermal system were studied, and the macro-mechanical and micro-structural characteristics of rock under different heating methods, different temperatures and different soaking times were studied as well. The results show that: 1) At the same site, there is little influence of geothermal system on rock mechanical properties, but when geothermal system is in place, the number of fissures and the cumulative opening has an obvious increase. 2) With the increase of soaking time, the maximum water content of mudstone can reach more than 30%, the water content of gypsum can not exceed 15%, the water softening effect of mudstone is more obvious than that of gypsum, and the mechanical index of mudstone decreases with the increase of water content. 3) In the natural state, the gypsum rock is brittle and the mudstone is ductile; the water-rock interface of the gypsum rock has a significant effect of dissolution, and the dissolution of the gypsum rock is intensified from the surface to the interior. 4) In the temperature ranges from 20 °C to 50 °C, the compressive strength of gypsum rock parabolically changes with temperature, while that of mudstone monotonously increases. 5) The loose filling between geothermal pipe and rock mass is easy to form seepage pathway and change the hydrodynamic condition. Under the action of flowing water, the rock mass at the crack of gypsum rock and the weak interlayer dissolves, forming big cavity and inducing building subsidence.

Key words: mud-stone, gypsum rock, geothermal system, experimental study, building subsidence

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 兰斌鹏, 王延平, 王卫国, 王义军, 赵跃, . 拉桩支护结构变形及工作机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 551-562.
[2] 于天佑, 蒋关鲁, 饶千竺, 朱丹, 陈虹羽, 刘先峰, . 水汽循环作用下红层泥岩的损伤劣化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 479-491.
[3] 王杰, 李冲, 刘磊, 丁阔, . 干湿循环下泥岩变形特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3132-3142.
[4] 陈康, 刘先峰, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 马杰, 陈忆涵, . 干湿循环下石灰改良红层泥岩填料力学性能劣化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 43-54.
[5] 李永威, 徐林荣, 傅金阳, 商拥辉, . 列车荷载作用下铁路路基填料渗透破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 299-308.
[6] 陈光波, 唐薇, 李谭, 王创业, 王二雨, 张国华, . 裂隙煤岩组合体单轴压缩力学响应及失稳机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2633-2652.
[7] 陈康, 刘先峰, 袁胜洋, 马杰, 陈忆涵, 蒋关鲁, . 含水率对红层泥岩填料刚度劣化特性及微观结构影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1976-1986.
[8] 余云燕, 丁小刚, 马丽娜, 崔文豪, 杜乾中. 微膨胀泥岩地基原位水分入渗响应特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 647-658.
[9] 陈博文, 李琦, 谭永胜, 余涛, 高文彬, 李霞颖, 申筛成, . 不同有效应力下泥岩盖层二氧化碳突破压力演化特征的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3681-3693.
[10] 陈康, 刘先峰, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 马杰, 陈忆涵, . 含水率对红层泥岩填料动力特性影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3705-3716.
[11] 银吉超, 白晓宇, 张亚妹, 闫楠, 王永洪, 张明义, . 一种模拟原状泥岩动力打桩与静载试验 装置的研制及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 698-710.
[12] 程树范, 曾亚武, 叶阳, 高睿, . 甘肃红层泥岩耐崩解试验与矿物夹杂效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 99-106.
[13] 程树范, 曾亚武, 高睿, 李涵, . 干湿作用下受荷石膏质泥岩的不可逆膨胀特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 332-340.
[14] 荣浩宇, 王伟, 李桂臣, 许嘉徽, 梁东旭, . 岩石−锚固剂结构水化失稳微观力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 784-798.
[15] 陈星, 李建林, 邓华锋, 党莉, 刘奇, 王兴霞, 王伟, . 卸荷蠕变条件下软硬相接岩层非协调变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 303-316.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!