岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 3705-3713.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0262

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑淤堵效应的疏浚淤泥真空固结沉降计算

蔡袁强1, 2，周岳富1，王鹏3，史吏2，王军3   

  1. 1. 哈尔滨工业大学（深圳）土木与环境工程学院，广东 深圳 518055；2. 浙江工业大学 土木工程学院，浙江 杭州 310023； 3. 温州大学 建筑与土木工程学院，浙江 温州 325035
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-09 修回日期:2020-04-13 出版日期:2020-11-11 发布日期:2020-12-25
  • 作者简介:蔡袁强，男，1965年生，博士，教授，主要从事基础工程学、土动力学、软土地基处理等方面的教学与研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划重点专项（No. 2016YFC08008020）；国家自然科学基金国际(地区)合作与交流项目（No. 51620105008）；国家自然科学基金项目（No. 51778499, No. 51478365, No. 51879234, No. 51622810）

Calculation on the settlement of dredged slurry treated by vacuum preloading method with consideration of clogging effects

CAI Yuan-qiang1, 2, ZHOU Yue-fu1, WANG Peng3, SHI Li2, WANG Jun3   

  1. 1. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310023, China; 3. College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China
  • Received:2020-01-09 Revised:2020-04-13 Online:2020-11-11 Published:2020-12-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0800200), the Projects of International Cooperation and Exchanges NSFC (51620105008) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China ( 51778499, 51478365, 51879234, 51622810).

PDF (Chinese)

239

摘要： 疏浚淤泥含水率高、强度极低，真空梯度作用下排水板周围会快速形成致密“土柱”，导致排水固结能力迅速下降，即出现淤堵现象。由疏浚淤泥真空固结室内模型试验获得了出水量变化情况和土体含水率、渗透系数的时空分布情况，确定了排水体周围淤堵区的形成时间与范围，提出了考虑时间效应与淤堵效应的真空度传递模式，同时考虑疏浚淤泥土体压缩和渗透的非线性，建立了考虑淤堵效应的固结分析模型，获得了相应的解析解，通过与已有数据和现场试验结果对比验证了该解答的有效性。利用该解析解，分析了真空度传递模式、淤堵系数λ和淤堵比c对沉降的影响。结果表明，淤堵效应明显减缓了沉降速率，也严重降低了疏浚淤泥的最终沉降量。

关键词: 真空预压, 真空度衰减, 固结, 淤堵, 沉降

Abstract: The dredged slurry has high water content and very low strength. It is generally considered that there will be no smear effect when the PVD is inserted. However, the dense "soil column" will be formed rapidly around the PVD under the vacuum pressure, which will greatly reduce the drainage capacity and fail to consolidate, i.e. clogging. The clogging effect of vacuum preloading on the dredged slurry is studied through laboratory tests. Based on the drainage volume and rate with consolidation time in the test, the formation time and the range of clogging zone are determined by the spatial and temporal distribution of the water content and permeability coefficient of soils. A vacuum transfer mode considering the clogging effect and the time effect is proposed. At the same time, considering the nonlinear relationship between the compressibility and the permeability of soils, an analysis model for analyzing the consolidation considering the clogging effect is established and the corresponding analytical solutions are obtained. The validity of the analytical solution is verified by comparing with the existing data and field test results. The influence of vacuum transfer mode, λ and c on the final settlement is analyzed by using the analytical solution in this work. The results show that the clogging effect obviously slows down the settlement rate and greatly reduces the final settlement of dredged slurry.

Key words: vacuum preloading, attenuation of vacuum pressure, consolidation, clogging, settlement

中图分类号: U 616
[1] 张治国, 陈胤吉, 朱正国, 魏纲, 孙苗苗, . 软土小曲率盾构隧道开挖诱发黏弹性地层沉降的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 309-321.
[2] 潘申鑫, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 刘先峰, 何梓雷, 曹丽君, 周诗广, . 高速铁路整体刚性面板加筋土挡墙地震作用下服役性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 519-530.
[3] 鲍树峰, 董志良, 莫海鸿, 张劲文, 于立婷, 刘攀, 刘晓强, 侯明勋, . 浮泥−流泥静态间歇沉降与低压固结沉降计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2763-2772.
[4] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[5] 宋牧原, 杨明辉, 陈伟, 卢贤锥, . 基于自注意力-循环神经网络模型的盾构引发的土体沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2613-2625.
[6] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[7] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[8] 崔纪飞, 吴祯祯, 李林, 饶平平, . 考虑土体流变的新旧混合群桩变刚度调平研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1897-1906.
[9] 杨校辉, 赵子毅, 郭楠, 钱豹, 朱彦鹏, . 横观各向同性非饱和黄土蠕变特性及沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1489-1500.
[10] 周波翰, 张文利, 王栋. 球形贯入仪预测超固结土强度的数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1303-1309.
[11] 金磊, 李晶晶, 李新明, 孙翰卿, . 柔性边界的有限差分法−离散元法模拟及其对砂土三轴固结排水和不排水剪切特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 980-990.
[12] 武孝天, 姚仰平, 魏然, 崔文杰. 基于统一硬化模型的隧道施工引发土体变形数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1013-1024.
[13] 杨少朋, 杨爱武, 许福军, . 改性纤维排水板真空预压加固吹填软土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 789-797.
[14] 徐斌, 陈柯好, 庞锐, . 超固结黏土的剪胀方程及边界面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 449-456.
[15] FARHAD Jamil, 曾长女, 马媛, SHARAFAT Ali. 初始固结角度对饱和粉质土应变发展的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 527-538.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发