岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 3968-3978.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0624.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于二次抛物线型Mohr准则的悬臂式崩塌破坏 机制及失稳判据研究

王延平1,许强2   

  1. 1. 山东理工大学 建筑工程学院,山东 淄博 255000;2. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-15 修回日期:2020-06-19 出版日期:2020-12-11 发布日期:2021-01-18
  • 作者简介:王延平,男,1975年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩土体稳定性方面的研究。

Study of failure mechanism and instability criterion of cantilever collapse based on Mohr criterion of quadratic parabola

WANG Yan-ping1, XU Qiang2   

  1. 1. School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, Shandong 255000, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
  • Received:2020-05-15 Revised:2020-06-19 Online:2020-12-11 Published:2021-01-18

摘要: 悬臂式崩塌是崩塌灾害中较常见的类型,它一般常见于河谷和具有软硬相间坡体结构的岩质边坡中。边坡在差异风化作用下,在其坡脚往往形成岩腔,并最终发育形成悬臂式崩塌。悬臂式崩塌是一种常见的地质灾害,在宏观上表现为倾倒变形特征。由于该类型崩塌的形状尺寸差异较大,其破坏模式具有较大差异,目前还无法定量描述其破坏过程。因此根据悬臂式崩塌的变形破坏特征,采用力学分析方法建立了基于二次抛物线型Mohr准则的悬臂式崩塌张拉破坏和剪切破坏的判定公式。判定公式计算结果和物理模拟试验结果对比分析表明:悬臂式崩塌的拉张安全系数要远小于剪切安全系数,试验模型随着裂纹的扩展,首先发生拉张破坏,随后裂纹继续扩展到一定深度,模型发生剪切破坏。判定公式能较好地定量描述悬臂式崩塌的变形破坏过程的各个阶段,准确地定量揭示悬臂式崩塌的变形破坏机制。

关键词: 悬臂式崩塌, 二次抛物线型Mohr准则, 剪切破坏, 张拉破坏

Abstract: Cantilever collapse is a common type of collapse disaster, which is usually found in river valley and rock slope with soft and hard slope structure. Under the action of differential weathering, rock cavity often forms at the foot of slope, and finally develops into cantilever collapse. Cantilevered collapse is a common geological disaster and characterized by toppling deformation. As the shape and size of this type of collapse are quite different, their failure modes are quite different, it is thus not able to describe its failure process quantitatively at present. Therefore, according to the deformation and failure characteristics of cantilever collapse, the judgment formula of tension failure and shear failure of cantilever collapse based on the quadratic parabola-typed Mohr criterion is established by using the mechanical analysis method. The calculation results of the judgment formula is compared with the results of the physical simulation test, and the analysis result shows that the tensile safety factor of the cantilever collapse is far less than the shear safety factor. With the crack growth, the tensile failure occurs first, and then the shear failure occurs when the crack continues to expand to a certain depth. The judgment formula can describe the deformation and failure process of cantilever collapse quantitatively and accurately, and reveal the deformation and failure mechanism of cantilever collapse quantitatively and accurately.

Key words: cantilever collapse, Mohr criterion of quadratic parabola, shear damage, tension damage

中图分类号: TU457
[1] 陈笑予, 姚强岭, 陈胜焱, 山长昊, 李英虎, 徐强, 于利强, 夏泽, 朱柳, 落弘业, . 基于深部含水煤样失稳特征的荷载梁式主控裂隙模型的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 375-386.
[2] 刘畅, 江权, 阮航, 李超毅, 杜三林. 常法向应力下非连续结构面剪切破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 173-185.
[3] 郑立夫, 高永涛, 周喻, 黄昌富, 程业, . 基于黏土地层剪切破坏理论直墙拱形 冻结壁厚度初选方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 397-409.
[4] 高要辉, 张春生, 苏方声, 邱士利, . 深部硬岩剪切边界下应力诱发片帮的机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1103-1111.
[5] 宋磊博, 亢倩倩, 杜时贵, 钟振, 王刚, 王兴开, 韩观胜, 赵金帅, . 基于表面微凸体磨损特征演化规律的节 理剪切强度各向异性机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2331-2343.
[6] 晏青, 赵均海, 张常光. 基于统一强度理论的临坡加筋地基极限承载力新解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1587-1600.
[7] 王家辉, 饶锡保, 江洎洧, 姚劲松, 熊诗湖, 卢一为, 李浩民, . 振冲碎石桩复合地基抗剪机制的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1095-1103.
[8] 樊科伟, 刘斯宏, 廖洁, 方斌昕, 王建磊, . 袋装石土工袋剪切力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 477-484.
[9] 王伟, 陈国庆, 郑水全, 张广泽, 王栋, . 考虑张拉-剪切渐进破坏的边坡矢量和法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 468-476.
[10] 许江, 雷娇, 刘义鑫, 邬君宇, . 充填物性质影响结构面剪切特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4129-4137.
[11] 程立朝 ,许 江 ,冯 丹 ,田傲雪 ,刘义鑫,. 岩石剪切细观开裂演化与贯通机制分析[J]. , 2016, 37(3): 655-664.
[12] 张明义,寇海磊,白晓宇,张宗强. 玻璃纤维增强聚合物抗浮锚杆抗拔性能试验研究与机制分析[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1069-1076.
[13] 杨 扬,卢坤林,朱大勇. 局部剪切破坏模式下的无重地基承载力[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 232-237.
[14] 宋福贵,王炳龙,黄大维,张 超,李培妍. 钢套管灌注群桩施工顺序对多隧道的影响[J]. , 2012, 33(8): 2330-2336.
[15] 刘东燕,孙海涛,张 艳. 采动影响下采区上覆岩层层间剪切滑移模型分析[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 609-614.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!