岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 923-932.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0585

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

活动性断裂带错动下隧道纵向响应的解析解

刘国钊1, 2,乔亚飞1, 2,何满潮1,樊 勇3,   

  1. 1. 同济大学 土木工程学院地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092; 3. 云南省水利水电勘测设计研究院,云南 昆明 650021
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-27 修回日期:2019-07-29 出版日期:2020-03-11 发布日期:2020-05-26
  • 通讯作者: 乔亚飞,男,1990年生,博士,助理研究员,主要从事岩土力学及隧道工程方面的科研工作。E-mail: yafei.qiao@tongji.edu.cn E-mail: 320557133@qq.com
  • 作者简介:刘国钊,男,1994年生,硕士研究生,主要从事隧道与断裂带相互作用方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    上海市青年科技英才杨帆计划(No.19YF1451400);云南省交通厅科技项目(No.2017-37-2);滇中引水工程关键技术研究。

An analytical solution of longitudinal response of tunnels under dislocation of active fault

LIU Guo-zhao1, 2, QIAO Ya-fei1, 2, HE Man-chao1, FAN Yong3   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Yunnan Institute of Water & Hydropower Engineering Investigation, Design and Research, Kunming, Yunnan 650021, China
  • Received:2019-03-27 Revised:2019-07-29 Online:2020-03-11 Published:2020-05-26
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by Shanghai Sailing Program(19YF1451400), the Technical Project of Yunnan Provincial Communications Department (2017-37-2) and the Key Technology Research on Water Diversion Project for Central Area of Yunnan Province.

摘要: 震害调研表明,活动性断裂带区域的隧道灾害最为严重。针对错动作用下穿越活动性断裂带隧道的纵向响应进行了研究,推导了隧道纵向力学响应的解析解并进行了验证。考虑断裂破碎带围岩力学性质较差且处于错动变形的主要影响区,将隧道沿纵向进行分区,包括错动影响区、过渡影响区和非影响区。采用Pasternak双参数弹性地基梁,假定不同分区的地基参数和计算模式不同,建立了满足变形和内力连续的隧道纵向力学解析模型并进行了求解。解析计算结果与数值模拟结果、室内试验数据基本一致,验证了解析解的正确性。结果表明:错动作用下,活动性断裂带区域的隧道内力和变形发生了显著变化;隧道纵向挠曲变形与错动方向一致,但在断裂带与上下盘交界区域发生了反向的挠曲;在正断层错动下,纵向弯矩在断裂带与上下盘交界区域达到最大值,且上、下盘区域的隧道拱顶分别出现受拉和受压区域;断裂带区域内的剪力远大于其他区域,且受到较大弯矩,隧道结构易发生破坏。上述计算结果与实际调研结果相一致,表明了提出的解析计算方法可用于活动性断裂带错动下的隧道纵向响应分析。最后,针对地基系数和断裂带宽度两个关键参数进行了敏感性分析,得到了有益规律,可为该类区域的隧道设计和施工提供技术支撑。

关键词: 活动性断裂带, 错动, 解析解, 弹性地基梁, 纵向响应

Abstract: The site investigation on earthquake damage shows that tunnels in the active fault zone suffer the most serious disasters. To investigate the longitudinal response of tunnels crossing the active fault under the dislocation, this paper proposed and verified an analytical solution of longitudinal mechanical behavior for tunnels. The active fault zone has worse mechanical properties and is the place where the main dislocation occurs. Therefore, the tunnel is divided into three parts in the longitudinal direction, including dislocation affected zone, transient zone and non-influence zone. Assuming that these three zones have different model parameters and calculation modes, an analytical mechanical model of the tunnel is formulated based on the double-parameter Pasternak elastic foundation beam. The proposed model satisfies the continuity of deformation and stress along the longitude direction. Analytical solutions agree well with the numerical simulation results and the laboratory mock-up test observations, demonstrating its good capacity. Analytical results reveal that the tunnel internal force and deformation show a significant increase in the active fault zone under the dislocation. The longitudinal deflection of the tunnel is similar to the dislocation while it has a reverse deflection at the junction zone between the fault zone and the foot or hanging wall. For the dislocation of normal fault, the longitude moment reaches its maximum value at the junction zone between the fault zone and the foot or hanging wall, and a tensile and compressive zone appear in the crown of tunnel on the side of the foot and hanging wall respectively. Shear force in the active fault zone is also bigger than that in the foot and hanging wall. All above responses result in the serious disasters in the fault zone, which is consistent with the site investigation results. Therefore, the proposed analytical solution could be used for the tunnel longitude response analysis under the dislocation. Finally, sensitivity analyses of the ground coefficient and the fault width are performed and useful results are summarized, which can provide technical supports for the tunnel design and construction in the active fault zone.

Key words: active fault, dislocation, analytical solution, elastic foundation beam, longitudinal response

中图分类号: U 45
[1] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[2] 赖丰文, 刘松玉, 蔡国军, 鲁泰山, 李洪江, 段伟, . 基于孔压静力触探原位测试的基坑围护结构变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2650-2660.
[3] 周航, 汪义圣, 亓戈平, . 黏弹性土中异形桩横向动力响应半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 761-774.
[4] 王浩, 侯泓冰, 江文豪, . 考虑根系对水文特性影响下非饱和植被土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3329-3345.
[5] 张智卿, 刘鑫, 刘开富, 吴君涛, 吴文兵, . 横观各向同性土体中端承桩水平振动特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3371-3382.
[6] 江学辉, 颜建伟, 罗文俊, 李佳宝, 徐长节. 纵向压力和加固钢板对隧道力学性能影响的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1623-1632.
[7] 王亦炀, 李传勋, 李阔, 陆向综. 竖井地基大应变非线性固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1446-1456.
[8] 刘景锦, 罗学思, 雷华阳, 郑刚, 罗昊鹏, . 等应变条件下增压式真空预压固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 809-821.
[9] 高柳, 吕述晖, 王奎华, . 缺陷桩-梁系统的动力特性应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3095-3104.
[10] 张玉国, 杨文兵, 赵雅纯, 王闯, 赵亚敏. 双向渗流下考虑应力时空效应的组合桩复合地基固结理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 184-196.
[11] 余俊, 李东凯, 和振, 张志中. 带有两端防渗墙坝基的各向异性渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2381-2388.
[12] 范雷, 余美万, 邬爱清, 向前. 层间错动带水力耦合抗剪强度特性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1959-1970.
[13] 钟小春, 黄思远, 槐荣国, 朱诚, 胡一康, 陈旭泉, . 基于浆液浮力试验的盾尾管片纵向上浮特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1615-1624.
[14] 黄娟, 和振, 余俊, 杨鑫歆. 渗透各向异性圆形围堰稳态渗流场解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1035-1043.
[15] 郑长杰, 崔亦秦, 吴琛, 罗通, 栾鲁宝, . 竖向入射S波作用下单桩水平地震响应简化解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 327-336.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!