岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 1799-1808.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0977

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

饱水和天然状态下页岩滞后效应及阻尼特性研究

蒋长宝1, 2,魏财1, 2,段敏克1, 2,陈昱霏1, 2,余塘1, 2,李政科1, 2   

  1. 1. 重庆大学 煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点实验室,重庆 400044;2. 重庆大学 资源与安全学院,重庆 400044
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-02 修回日期:2019-11-21 出版日期:2020-06-11 发布日期:2020-07-31
  • 作者简介:蒋长宝,男,1982年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事采矿工程方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51674048);重庆市科技计划(No.cstc2015jcyjA90009)。

Hysteresis effect and damping characteristics of shale under saturated and natural state

JIANG Chang-bao1, 2, WEI Cai1, 2, DUAN Min-ke1, 2, CHEN Yu-fei1, 2, YU Tang1, 2, LI Zheng-ke1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China; 2. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
  • Received:2019-06-02 Revised:2019-11-21 Online:2020-06-11 Published:2020-07-31
  • Contact: 魏财,男,1994年生,硕士研究生,主要从事页岩气开采方面的研究工作。E-mail: 1069012020@qq.com E-mail:jcb@cqu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51674048) and the Fundamental and Advanced Research Projects of Chongqing(cstc2015jcyjA90009).

摘要: 运用RLW-2000型微机伺服岩石三轴试验机,对饱水状态和天然状态页岩在不同围压下进行三轴循环加卸载试验,分析了两种含水状态页岩的力学特性和滞后效应,并基于能量原理讨论了阻尼比演化规律。试验结果表明:随循环次数增加,累积残余应变逐渐增加,相对残余应变先降低,后趋于稳定区域,直至破坏前急剧增加;饱水页岩的加卸载变形模量均比天然页岩小,加载变形模量整体比卸载变形模量小;在加载和卸载阶段,均出现应变始终滞后于应力的现象;饱水页岩的滞后效应比天然页岩更明显。提出了考虑滞后效应的能量计算方法,较以往能量计算的误差更小。最后基于能量原理对阻尼比的计算公式进行修正,发现饱水页岩的阻尼比比天然页岩大。阻尼比的变化较好地反映了页岩损伤机制,可作为预判页岩失稳破坏的重要指标。

关键词: 页岩, 力学特性, 滞后效应, 能量, 阻尼比

Abstract: An RLW-2000 micro-computer servo-control rock triaxial testing machine was used to carry out triaxial cyclic loading and unloading experiments of saturated and natural shales under different confining pressures. The mechanical properties and hysteresis effects of two hydrated shales were analyzed. The evolution law of the damping ratio was discussed based on the energy principle. The experimental results show that as the cycle number increases, the cumulative residual strain increases gradually. The relative residual strain decreases first and then tends to a stable region, and finally increases rapidly prior to the rock damage. The deformation modulus of the saturated shale is smaller than that of the natural shale during the loading and unloading process. Besides, the loading deformation modulus is smaller than that of the unloading deformation modulus. In the loading and unloading stages, it is observed that the strain always lags the stress. The hysteresis effect of saturated shale is more obvious than that of natural shale. An energy calculation method is proposed considering the hysteresis effect with a smaller error of the calculated energy compared with that of the previous energy calculation. Finally, the calculation formula of the damping ratio is revised based on the energy principle. It is found that the damping ratio of saturated shale is larger than that of natural shale. The change of damping ratio reflects the shale damage mechanism, which can be used as an important indicator to predict the instability of shale.

Key words: shale, mechanical properties, hysteresis effect, energy, damping ratio

中图分类号: TU452
[1] 吴俊, 闵一凡, 征西遥, 韩晨, 牛富俊, 朱宝林, . 地质聚合物固化淤泥法制备再生细骨料的压缩变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 159-170.
[2] 董林, 陈强, 夏坤, 李彦苍, 李燕, 王晓磊. 细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 228-237.
[3] 张春瑞, 纪洪广, 付桢, 张月征, 宋宇, 田竹华, 范文博, . 白云石对粉砂岩物理力学性质影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2661-2675.
[4] 黄德昕, 温韬, 陈宁生, . 考虑能量演化的岩石残余强度确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2825-2836.
[5] 屈俊童, 时启壮, 郭颖杰, 张 翔, 刘 熠, 蒋德阳. 冻融循环作用下冰碛土力学特性及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2859-2872.
[6] 侯小强, 杨芮, 李瑞冬, 樊小鹏, 郑佳乐, 侯宝胜, . 卵石土混合体随机生成方法与宏细观力学演化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2967-2979.
[7] 余小越, 许明, 谢强, 蔡宇, 刘先珊, 甘峰帆, . SH波在三角形山体地形中的散射与能量分布规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2639-2649.
[8] 张培森, 王洪伟, 洪荒, 许大强, 陈增宝, 邓云驰, 梁展, 李金坤, 陈文豪, 崔乾, . 渗流-采动应力耦合作用下深部砂岩力学及能量演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1997-2010.
[9] 张立刚, 李浩, 李庆龙, 袁胜斌, 刘照义, 姬建飞, 马媛媛, 李钧儒, 宋永扬, . 点载作用下页岩岩屑史氏硬度尺度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1678-1686.
[10] 唐巨鹏, 黄磊, 潘一山, 任凌冉, 张昕, 张众华, . 煤层倾角突变区煤与瓦斯突出模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1719-1730.
[11] 张涛艺, 王家全, 林志南, 唐毅, . 细粒含量对砾性土路基劣化及静力剪切特性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1141-1152.
[12] 常洪林, 孔纲强, 王福慧, 王成龙, 周杨, . 褥垫层作用下预应力高强混凝土能量桩热力响应特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1240-1251.
[13] 林韩祥, 冯雪峰, 张强勇, 段抗, 张修峰, 刘传成, 陈长鹏, 赵钰, . 高位厚硬岩层破断力学机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1264-1277.
[14] 宋勇军, 卢云龙, 王双龙, 谢丽君, 操警辉, 安旭晨, . 岩石冻融过程未冻水含量演化特征及对力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1049-1059.
[15] 苏永华, 杨忠武, 岳梢, 李明. 基于四边形孔静力定向裂岩的断裂评判标准研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 695-705.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!