岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 1855-1864.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1125

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究

邹新军1, 2,曹雄1,周长林1   

  1. 1. 湖南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410082;2. 湖南大学 建筑安全与节能教育部重点实验室,湖南 长沙 410082
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-27 修回日期:2019-11-01 出版日期:2020-06-11 发布日期:2020-08-01
  • 作者简介:邹新军,男,1975年生,博士,副教授,主要从事桩基础设计计算理论与应用研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51578231,No.51378197)

Model study on the bearing behavior of V-H combined loaded pile in sand considering the current effects

ZOU Xin-jun1, 2, CAO Xiong1, ZHOU Chang-lin1   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Building Safety and Energy Efficiency of Ministry of Education, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China
  • Received:2019-06-27 Revised:2019-11-01 Online:2020-06-11 Published:2020-08-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51578231, 51378197).

摘要: 海上风机大直径单桩基础除承受竖向荷载V与水平荷载H外,同时还受水流冲刷、扰动。基于Swipe加载法,在室内水槽模型中设计完成了砂土中的V-H联合受荷桩测试,获得了静、动水流状态及不同竖向力大小条件下的荷载?位移曲线及桩身弯矩分布;经无量纲化处理与拟合,得到了考虑水流影响的V-H联合受荷桩承载力包络线及其简化计算公式。结果表明:水流冲刷降低了总的桩侧摩阻力,导致竖向荷载-位移曲线初始刚度降低;桩身水平位移和弯矩在仅受水流作用时较小,但同时受水流、水平荷载作用相比于单一水平受力时则明显增大;增加桩顶竖向荷载在水平位移较小时有助于提高桩身水平承载力,但随水平位移增大且竖向荷载接近竖向极限承载力Vu时,可能会因重力二阶(P-Δ)效应而削弱桩身水平承载力;桩身最大弯矩位置不会随水流状态与竖向荷载大小的改变而明显变化,基本保持在泥面以下2~3倍桩径处。

关键词: 大直径单桩, 水流, V-H联合荷载, 承载特性, 模型试验

Abstract: Large-diameter single pile foundations of offshore wind turbines are always subjected to complex scour and disturbance of currents, as well as the vertical load (V) and horizontal load (H). Based on the Swipe loading method, the test of V-H combined loaded piles in sand is designed and completed in flume. The load-displacement curves and the bending moment of the pile shaft under both static and flowing states with different vertical loads are obtained. By dimensionless processing and fitting, the envelope of the V-H combined bearing capacity with consideration of the current effects is obtained. The results show that the total friction resistance of the pile side decreases due to the scouring action caused by the currents, and thus leading to decrease in the initial stiffness of the vertical load-displacement curve. When merely subjecting to the currents, the horizontal displacement and bending moment of the pile shaft are relative small, but they show significant increments when simultaneously subjecting to the combined action of horizontal force and the currents. An increase in the vertical force V on the pile head helps to improve the horizontal bearing capacity of the pile when the horizontal displacement of the pile is small. But when the horizontal displacement is large and V approaches to the limitation of the vertical bearing capacity Vu, the horizontal bearing capacity of the pile will be decreased due to the second order effects of gravity(P-Δ). The position of the maximum bending moment of the pile shaft is not significant changed with the flow state and V, which generally appears at the locations of 2–3 times the pile diameter below the mud line.

Key words: large-diameter single pile, currents, V-H combined load, bearing behavior, model test

中图分类号: TU 473.1
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[6] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[7] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[8] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[9] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[10] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[11] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[12] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[13] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[14] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[15] 孙旻洋, 王忠瑾, 谢新宇, 张日红, 娄扬, 朱大勇, . 饱和黏土中能源群桩热力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 382-390.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!