岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 2168-2178.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0219

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

稻壳灰加筋土力学性能研究

李丽华1, 2,余肖婷1, 2,肖衡林1, 2,马强1, 2,刘一鸣1, 2,杨星1, 2   

  1. 1. 湖北工业大学 土木建筑与环境学院,湖北 武汉 430068;2. 湖北工业大学 生态道路工程研究中心,湖北 武汉 430068
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-28 修回日期:2019-08-21 出版日期:2020-07-10 发布日期:2020-09-10
  • 作者简介:李丽华,女,1980年生,博士,教授,主要从事加筋土、环境岩土方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51678224,No. 51778217);湖北省杰出青年基金项目(No. 2018CFA063);省中央引导地方科技发展专项(No.2019ZYYD053,No.2018ZYYD005)。

Mechanical properties of reinforcement about rice husk ash mixed soil

LI Li-hua1, 2, YU Xiao-ting1, 2, XIAO Heng-lin1, 2, MA Qiang1, 2, LIU Yi-ming1, 2, YANG Xing1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430068, China; 2. Ecological Road Engineering Research Center, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430068, China
  • Received:2019-01-28 Revised:2019-08-21 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-09-10
  • Contact: 肖衡林,男,1977年生,博士,教授,主要从事环境岩土方面的研究。E-mail: xiao-henglin@163.com E-mail:lilihua466@163.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation Project (51678224, 51778217), the Outstanding Youth Fund Project in Hubei Province(2018CFA063) and the Provincial Central Committee Guides Local Science and Technology (2019ZYYD053, 2018ZYYD005).

摘要: 稻壳灰与土体混合应用,一方面废弃资源再利用,环保,又可增强土体强度。通过三轴试验,研究不同比例稻壳灰混合黏土及其加筋土应力?应变性能、强度特性以及不同应变水平下模量、偏应力及加筋强度比等土体变化特征。试验结果表明,随稻壳灰比例增加,混合土最大干密度显著减小,最优含水率显著增加。添加不同比例稻壳灰对加筋土抗剪强度有较大影响,10%~15%稻壳灰比例下,加筋稻壳灰混合土初始切线模量和应力峰值达到最大,抗剪强度较优。与土工织物加筋稻壳灰混合土相比,土工格栅加筋稻壳灰混合土偏应力及抗剪强度更大,土工格栅层数对土体抗剪强度增大效果更明显,对应的应力?应变曲线拐点也更突出。试样弹性模量与稻壳灰比例及筋材种类、层数有关,加入稻壳灰后,土体弹性模量增长显著,土工格栅加筋稻壳灰混合土较优比例下可增加1.5倍多,稻壳灰及筋材均能有效提高土体强度。随加筋层数增加,稻壳灰混合土加筋强度比明显增大,与围压关系较小。

关键词: 稻壳灰, 三轴试验, 加筋土, 应力?应变, 强度

Abstract: The rice husk ash, which is environmental friendly waste-recycling, can strengthen the soil. Triaxial tests were conducted to study the stress-strain properties, strength characteristics, and variation characteristics at different strain levels including the elastic modulus, deviator stress and reinforcement strength ratio of rice husk ash mixed clay with different proportions of rice husk ash and its reinforced soil. The test results show that the maximum dry density of the mixed soil reduces significantly and the optimum moisture obviously increases with the increase of rice husk ash content. The content of rice hush ash has a great influence on the shear strength of the reinforced soil, and rice husk ash-soil mixture’ s initial tangent modulus and peak stress that addition of 10%?15% rice husk ash is recommended as the maximum. Compared with geotextile reinforced rice-husk-ash mixed soil, higher deviatoric stress and shear strength are observed on specimens with geogrid, and this trend is more obvious with the increase of the number of reinforcement layers. It also shows that the inflection point of the stress-strain curve is more prominent with the increase of the number of reinforcement layers. The elastic modulus of the mixture material depends on the content of rice husk ash, the type and layers of reinforcement. After adding the rice husk ash, the elastic modulus of the soil increases significantly, and it increases 1.5 times in better content when reinforced by geogrid, both rice husk ash and the reinforcement can effectively strengthen the soils. As the number of reinforced layer increases, the reinforcement strength of rice husk ash-soil mixture increases significantly but has little relation with the confining pressure.

Key words: rice husk ash, triaxial test, reinforced soil, stress-strain, strength

中图分类号: TU 43
[1] 付强, 杨科, 刘钦节, 宋涛涛, 吴犇牛, 于鹏, . 交变荷载下围岩−衬砌组合结构界面强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 40-52.
[2] 潘申鑫, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 刘先峰, 何梓雷, 曹丽君, 周诗广, . 高速铁路整体刚性面板加筋土挡墙地震作用下服役性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 519-530.
[3] 杨烜宇, 王勇, . 考虑不同凸起体宽度的规则形态土−岩界面剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 195-204.
[4] 吴倩婵, 章荣军, 徐志豪, 杨钊, 郑俊杰, . 絮凝剂对固化流泥强度行为及变形特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 205-216.
[5] 董林, 陈强, 夏坤, 李彦苍, 李燕, 王晓磊. 细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 228-237.
[6] 黄德昕, 温韬, 陈宁生, . 考虑能量演化的岩石残余强度确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2825-2836.
[7] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[8] 沈扬, 沈嘉毅, 梁晖, 樊科伟. 基于3D打印技术的仿真钙质砂三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2353-2362.
[9] 李晓锋, 李海波, 刘黎旺, 傅帅旸, . 冲击荷载作用下岩石动态拉伸破坏特征及细观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2387-2398.
[10] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[11] 徐卫卫, 谢遵党, 傅中志, 米占宽, . 粗粒土真三轴试验南水模型研究及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2559-2572.
[12] 曹祎, 荣传新, 王衍森, 常磊, 王彬, . 冻结钙质黏土复杂应力路径下的力学响应及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2071-2084.
[13] 陈嘉瑞, 樊宝云, 叶剑红, 张春顺, . 钙质砂颗粒破碎特性及破碎演化模型三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2095-2105.
[14] 胡丰慧, 方祥位, 申春妮, 王春艳, 邵生俊, . 真三轴条件下珊瑚砂颗粒破碎、强度和剪胀性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2147-2159.
[15] 黄英豪, 毛帅东, 张娟, 王文翀, 王硕, . 轻质流态固化淤泥回填料基本性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1700-1708.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!