岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8): 2525-2535.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1799

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑膨胀应力和剪胀的深埋隧道弹塑性解

陈有亮1, 2,刘耕云1,杜曦1, 3,RAFIG Azzam2,吴东鹏1, 4   

  1. 1. 上海理工大学 环境与建筑学院 土木工程系,上海 200093;2. 亚琛工业大学 工程地质与水文地质系,德国 亚琛 52064; 3. 新南威尔士大学 土木与环境工程学院,澳大利亚 悉尼 2052;4. 上海申通地铁集团有限公司,上海 201804
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-21 修回日期:2020-03-14 出版日期:2020-08-14 发布日期:2020-10-17
  • 作者简介:陈有亮,男,1966年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事隧道与地下工程、能源与环境岩土工程等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 10872133);上海市软科学研究领域重点项目(No. 18692106100)。

Elastoplastic solution for a deep-buried tunnel considering swelling stress and dilatancy

CHEN You-liang1, 2, LIU Geng-yun1, DU Xi1, 3, RAFIG Azzam2, WU Dong-peng1, 4   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, School of Environment and Architecture, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China; 2. Department of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen 52064, Germany; 3. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia; 4. Shanghai Shentong Metro Group Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201804, China
  • Received:2019-10-21 Revised:2020-03-14 Online:2020-08-14 Published:2020-10-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (10872133) and the Key Projects in Soft Science Research in Shanghai (18692106100).

摘要: 基于湿度应力场理论,推导了考虑膨胀应力和剪胀特性的圆形隧道开挖后围岩力学响应的弹塑性解。将隧道软弱围岩遇水膨胀现象视为湿度-应力耦合过程,基于Fick第二定律,推导了圆形隧洞围岩内湿度扩散非稳态解。采用非关联流动法则,获得了隧道高膨胀势区的应力和位移解答。以两种不同质量岩体开挖的隧洞为例,分析了膨胀围岩应力和变形的影响因素。结果表明,考虑膨胀应力(取决于围岩含水率变化和湿度膨胀系数)时,塑性区扩大,松动圈厚度增加,应力收敛变慢。当膨胀应力增大到一定程度时,塑性区将出现拉应力区。膨胀岩隧洞开挖遇水作用,膨胀应力增加的围岩变形远大于地应力引起的围岩变形。同时,应力剪胀对膨胀性围岩的变形影响不容忽视,尤其是在支护抗力较小的情况下,洞壁处径向位移增加显著。

关键词: 深埋隧道, 湿度应力场, 膨胀应力, 剪胀, 弹塑性解

Abstract: This study focuses on tunneling under challenging conditions, particularly with regard to the stress distribution and deformation in the humidity stress field. The swelling phenomenon during tunneling has been treated as a coupled humidity–mechanics process, where the humidity diffusion and stress dilatancy are considered together to obtain stress and deformation fields for tunnels crossing the formations with high swelling potential. A solution to the nonstationary process of humidity transfer has been derived according to Fick’s second law. The swelling pressure has been included in the form of body force, and a non-associated flow rule has been adopted to obtain the analytical solutions. Next, considering the examples of rock tunnels that are excavated in two different quality rock mass, we have investigated the impact factors on stress and deformation in swelling surrounding rock. Numerical results show that the inclusion of the swelling stress increases the plastic zone of the surrounding rock and the maximum stress at the elastic-plastic boundary, whereas the stress convergence has been decreased. After a certain increase in swelling pressure, a tensile stress zone appears in the plastic circle. The deformation of surrounding rock caused by swelling pressure can be much more significant than that caused by in-situ stress. Furthermore, the effect of dilatancy on the deformation rock cannot be negligible especially when the support resistance is small. This paper presents a new possible workflow to quickly evaluate the elastic-plastic stress and deformation of tunnels in swelling surrounding rock.

Key words: deep-buried tunnel, humidity stress field, swelling stress, dilatancy, elastoplastic solution

中图分类号: TU 431
[1] 冉龙洲, 袁松, 王希宝, 张廷彪, 刘德军, 黎良仆, . 考虑围岩−盾体−注浆体−管片相互作用的深埋护盾式隧道掘进机法隧道围岩压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 366-376.
[2] 周雄雄, 黄佳铄, 李若婷, 张建余, . 堆石料湿化变形的修正剑桥模型及其参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2703-2710.
[3] 胡丰慧, 方祥位, 申春妮, 王春艳, 邵生俊, . 真三轴条件下珊瑚砂颗粒破碎、强度和剪胀性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2147-2159.
[4] 徐斌, 陈柯好, 庞锐, . 超固结黏土的剪胀方程及边界面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 449-456.
[5] 耿潇威, 陈成, 孙中华, 黎伟, 王勇, 徐梦冰, 余颂, . 基于广义位势理论的考虑组构各向异性的砂土本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3175-3186.
[6] 宋洋, 王贺平, 张维东, 赵立财, 周健华, 毛镜涵, . 恒定法向刚度条件下加锚充填节理岩体剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2695-2706.
[7] 张常光, 周渭, 徐灏, 赵帅, 孙珊珊, . 基于统一强度理论的扰损围岩巷道脆塑性解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1343-1355.
[8] 徐斌, 王星亮, 庞锐, 陈柯好, . 考虑组构演化的砂砾土弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3197-3211.
[9] 崔新壮, 姜鹏, 王艺霖, 金青, 陈璐, . 高摩阻超静定土工格栅在粗粒土夹层中的剪胀作用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 141-152.
[10] 赵顺利, 杨之俊, 傅旭东, 方正, . 考虑应变局部化的粗粒料剪切损伤力学机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 31-42.
[11] 蒋长宝, 余塘, 魏文辉, 段敏克, 杨阳, 魏财, . 加卸载应力作用下煤岩渗透率演化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 13-22.
[12] 刘燕晶, 王路君, 朱斌, 陈云敏, . 考虑填充和黏结作用的含水合物 沉积物弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2471-2482.
[13] 赵云, 杨忠方, 凌道盛, 陈鹏, 肖昭然, . 垃圾土中排水柱孔扩张问题弹塑性解[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1825-1832.
[14] 王一伟, 刘 润, 孙若晗, 许泽伟. 基于抗转模型的颗粒材料宏−细观关系研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 945-956.
[15] 王永红, 杜文, 张国辉, 宋扬, . 基于广义张−朱强度准则的深埋隧道 围岩塑性分析及应用探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 819-830.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!