岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (9): 2993-3002.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0226

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

级配碎石填料大三轴试验及累积塑性应变预测模型

杨志浩1, 2,岳祖润2,冯怀平2,叶朝良1,马德良1   

  1. 1. 石家庄铁道大学 土木工程学院,河北 石家庄 050043; 2. 石家庄铁道大学 省部共建交通工程结构力学行为与系统安全国家重点实验室,河北 石家庄 050043
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-04 修回日期:2020-07-08 出版日期:2020-09-11 发布日期:2020-10-21
  • 通讯作者: 岳祖润,男,1962年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地基变形控制与特殊土路基等方面的研究。E-mail:yzr1898@qq.com E-mail:yangzhihao@stdu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:杨志浩,男,1988年生,博士研究生,主要从事重载铁路路基病害整治及路基结构优化方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    河北省自然科学基金项目(No.E2019210137);中国铁路总公司科技研究开发计划项目(No.2017G008-G,No.2017G002-W,No.2017G008-A)。

Large scale triaxial tests on graded macadam filling and its accumulated plastic strain prediction model

YANG Zhi-hao1, 2, YUE Zu-run2, FENG Huai-ping2, YE Chao-liang1, MA De-liang1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structures, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China
  • Received:2020-03-04 Revised:2020-07-08 Online:2020-09-11 Published:2020-10-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (E2019210137) and the Technology Research and Development of China Railway Corporation (2017G008-G, 2017G002-W, 2017G008-A).

摘要: 级配碎石作为重载铁路基床表层的主要填料,其受列车荷载的影响最大。因此,研究级配碎石在循环荷载作用下的动力行为及累积塑性应变演化特征变得尤为重要。首先,通过制备不同细粒含量的级配碎石填料,开展一系列大型动三轴试验,探究细粒含量、围压及动应力幅值对循环荷载作用下试样累积塑性应变的耦合影响机制。其次,基于塑性安定理论,确定不同应力水平下试样的动力行为,得到考虑围压及细粒含量参数的塑性蠕变状态临界动应力计算模型。最后,结合试验数据,建立考虑应力水平及细粒含量参数的塑性蠕变动力行为累积塑性应变预测模型,并明确各参数的物理意义。其研究成果可为既有重载铁路路基健康状态评估及考虑强度、变形综合控制的路基结构设计提供参考。

关键词: 重载铁路基床, 级配碎石, 累积塑性应变, 临界动应力, 预测模型

Abstract: Graded macadam fillings, the core filling of heavy haul railway subgrade bed is most affected by the train loading. Therefore, it is particularly important to study the dynamic behavior and accumulative plastic strain evolution characteristics of graded macadam filling under cyclic loadings. Firstly, graded macadam fillings with different fine particle contents were prepared, and a series of large-scale dynamic triaxial tests was conducted to explore the coupling influence mechanism of fine particle content, confining pressure, and dynamic stress amplitude on the specimen accumulative plastic strain under cyclic loadings. Additionally, based on the plastic stability theory, the dynamic behavior of specimens under different stress levels was determined, and the calculation model of critical dynamic stress in the plastic creep state was obtained considering the parameters of confining pressure and fine particle content. Finally, in combination with the experimental data, an accumulative plastic strain prediction model was established considering the stress level and fine particle content parameters for the dynamic behavior of plastic creep, and the physical meaning of each parameter was clarified. The research results can provide a reference for the health status assessment of existing heavy haul railway subgrades and the subgrade structure design considering the comprehensive control of strength and deformation.

Key words: heavy haul railway subgrade bed, graded macadam, accumulative plastic strain, critical dynamic stress, prediction model

中图分类号: TU411
[1] 王梦洁, 张莎莎, 杨晓华, 张超, 晏长根, . 循环荷载作用下漫灌区粉质黏土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1215-1227.
[2] 丁前绅, 金佳旭, 曹天书, 刘磊, . 好氧降解对垃圾土沉降影响试验及干重度预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3065-3076.
[3] 郑思维, 胡明鉴, 霍玉龙, . 钙质砂渗透性影响因素及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 217-224.
[4] 周凤玺, 赵文沧. 基于土−水特征曲线的非饱和冻土未冻水含量预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2719-2727.
[5] 邓志兴, 谢康, 李泰灃, 王武斌, 郝哲睿, 李佳珅, . 基于粗颗粒嵌锁点高铁级配碎石振动压实质量控制新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1835-1849.
[6] 熊树森, 黄蕴晗, 赖莹, . 考虑锚胫作用下拖曳锚在成层土中的嵌入机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1495-1504.
[7] 陈康, 刘先峰, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 马杰, 陈忆涵, . 含水率对红层泥岩填料动力特性影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3705-3716.
[8] 贺铮, 谢谟文, 吴志祥, 赵晨, 孙广存, 徐乐, . 应用微芯桩传感器的拉裂型边坡危岩体临崩倾斜变形特征现场实测研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3399-3415.
[9] 雷华阳, 薄钰, 马长远, 王磊, 章纬地, . 多因素影响下黏土比热容变化规律及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 1-11.
[10] 彭赟, 胡明鉴, 阿颖, 王雪晴, . 珊瑚砂热物理参数测试与预测模型对比分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 884-895.
[11] 王书文, 鞠文君, 张春会, 苏士杰, 陆闯, . 弹脆性圆形煤巷应力跃升及冲击地压预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 873-883.
[12] 张金良, 杨风威, 曹智国, 苏伟林, . 大线速度下超高压水射流破岩试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 615-623.
[13] 金佳旭, 朱磊, 刘磊, 陈亿军, 姚远, 高腾飞, 李若欣, . 填埋场单井注气气体压力监测试验及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 259-267.
[14] 陈锐, 张星, 郝若愚, 包卫星. 干湿循环下地聚合物固化黄土强度 劣化机制与模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1164-1174.
[15] 仉文岗, 顾鑫, 刘汉龙, 张青, 王林, 王鲁琦, . 基于贝叶斯更新的非饱和土坡参数概率 反演及变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1112-1122.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!