岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (S1): 147-155.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1122

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

微生物分解有机质作用对泥炭土工程性质的影响

桂跃,吴承坤,赵振兴,刘声钧,刘锐,张秋敏   

  1. 昆明理工大学 建筑工程学院,云南 昆明 650051
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-22 修回日期:2019-07-20 出版日期:2020-06-19 发布日期:2020-06-09
  • 作者简介:桂跃,男,1982年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事软黏土力学及基坑、边坡及地下工程等方面教学与科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51568030,No.51768027,No.41662021)。

Effects of microbial decomposition of organic matter on engineering properties of peat soil

GUI Yue, WU Cheng-kun, ZHAO Zhen-xing, LIU Sheng-jun, LIU Rui, ZHANG Qiu-min   

  1. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan 650051, China
  • Received:2019-06-22 Revised:2019-07-20 Online:2020-06-19 Published:2020-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Fundation of China(51568030, 51768027, 41662021).

摘要: 微生物分解作用会改变泥炭土有机质含量和组分,影响土的工程性质,为探究这种现象,研发了模型试验装置,利用富集菌液对泥炭土进行了为期90 d的分解,对分解过程中泥炭土的物理力学性质进行分析测试。试验结果表明,(1)90 d内泥炭土有机质含量从67%下降至61.5%,随着分解时长增大,泥炭土颗粒相对密度Gs、饱和重度γsat增大,液限wL有较为明显的下降趋势,塑限wP变化幅度不大;(2)分解后的泥炭土压缩系数a1-2下降,压缩模量Es增大;(3)分解后的泥炭土固结快剪强度普遍有15%~25%的增大,黏聚力ccq从最初的18.3下降为15.6 kPa,内摩擦角φcq从13.9o增大到18.8o;(4)分解时长增大,经过预压重塑泥炭土样的渗透系数有下降趋势。分析表明,泥炭土工程性质的改变不仅和有机质含量下降有关,还可能与组分变化有关。

关键词: 微生物岩土, 有机质分解, 泥炭土, 抗剪强度参数, 渗透系数

Abstract: The microbial decomposition can reduce the organic content of peat soil and change its composition, thus affecting the engineering properties of soil. To explore this phenomenon, a model test device was developed to decompose the peat soil with enriched bacteria solution for 90 days. Then the physical and mechanical properties of the peat soil were analyzed and tested during the decomposition process. The results showed that the organic matter content of peat soil decreased from 67% to 61.5% within 90 days. As the decomposition time increased, the relative density Gs and saturation γsat of peat soil increased, the liquid limit wL decreased significantly, and the plastic limit wP almost maintains constant. The compression coefficient a1-2 of the decomposed peat soil decreased, while the compression modulus Es increased. The fast shear strength of the consolidated peat soil generally increased by 15%-25% after decomposition. The cohesion ccq decreased from the initial 18.3 to 15.6 kPa, while the internal friction angle φcq increased from 13.9oto 18.8o. The decomposition time increased, and the permeability coefficient of the pre-compressed peat soil sample decreased. The mechanism analysis shows that the change of engineering properties of peat soil is not only related to the decrease of organic matter content, but also related to the change of composition.

Key words: microbial geotechnical, organic matter degradation, peat soil, shearing strength, permeability coefficient

中图分类号: TD452
[1] 张兴文, 曹净, 雷舒羽, 李育红, 程芸, 张柠锐, . 富里酸环境对含腐殖酸水泥土结构及渗透性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 249-261.
[2] 曹瑞栋, 刘斯宏, 田金博, 鲁洋, 张勇敢, 李帆, . 考虑拉伸的土工袋体织物渗流特性试验及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2711-2720.
[3] 刘文林, 鄂天龙, 冯杨州, 牛松荧, 张子堂, 孙熠, 陈宏信, . 纳米改性地聚合物隔离墙材料基本工程特性及冻融循环耐久性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2039-2048.
[4] 雷舒羽, 曹净, 刘海明, 张兴文, 张柠锐. 工程碱性环境中泥炭土体结构性损伤试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2135-2146.
[5] 郑思维, 胡明鉴, 霍玉龙, . 钙质砂渗透性影响因素及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 217-224.
[6] 张化进, 吴顺川, 李兵磊, 赵宇松, . 基于高斯过程回归的岩石抗剪强度参数不确定性估测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 415-423.
[7] 崔允亮, 潘方然, 高楥园, 金子原, . 真空预压淤堵区渗透系数的计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2085-2093.
[8] 王新志, 黄鹏, 雷学文, 文东升, 丁浩桢, 刘铠诚, . 硫酸锌胶结珊瑚砂渗透特性试验及工程应用探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2094-2104.
[9] 李品良, 许强, 刘佳良, 何攀, 纪续, 陈婉琳, 彭大雷, . 盐分影响重塑黄土渗透性的微观机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 504-512.
[10] 吴广水, 田慧会, 郝丰富, 王书齐, 杨文洲, 祝婷梅, . 基于核磁共振T2时间分布快速预测不同干密度土体的渗透系数[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 513-520.
[11] 蔚立元, 杨瀚清, 王晓琳, 刘日成, 王蓥森. 循环剪切作用下三维粗糙裂隙非线性渗流特性数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2757-2766.
[12] 张宇, 何想, 路桦铭, 马国梁, 刘汉龙, 肖杨, . 微生物-膨润土联合矿化防渗模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2337-2349.
[13] 文少杰, 郑文杰, 胡文乐, . 铅污染对黄土宏观持水性能和微观结构演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 451-460.
[14] 刘宜昭, 陆阳, 刘松玉, . 重金属作用下改性水泥系隔离墙化学相容性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 497-506.
[15] 郑思维, 胡明鉴, 霍玉龙, 黎宇, . 盐溶液环境下钙质砂渗透性影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3522-3530.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!