岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (S1): 30-40.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1089

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

应力−渗流侵蚀耦合作用下粗糙裂隙渗流特性研究

王珂1,盛金昌1,郜会彩2,田晓丹1,詹美礼1,罗玉龙1   

  1. 1. 河海大学 水利水电学院,江苏 南京 210098;2. 绍兴文理学院 土木工程学院,浙江 绍兴 312000
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-18 修回日期:2019-10-21 出版日期:2020-06-19 发布日期:2020-06-04
  • 通讯作者: 盛金昌,男,1969年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩体渗流及其流固热化学多场耦合方面的教学和研究工作。E-mail:jinchang@hhu.edu.cn E-mail:1144932687@qq.com
  • 作者简介:王珂,女,1994年生,硕士研究生,主要从事粗糙裂隙面渗流特性和剪切特性方面的学习和研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51579078,No.51679070);浙江省山体地质灾害防治协同创新中心开放基金项目(PCMGH-2017-Z-02)。

Study on seepage characteristics of rough crack under coupling of stress-seepage erosion

WANG Ke1, SHENG Jin-chang1, GAO Hui-cai2, TIAN Xiao-dan1, ZHAN Mei-li1, LUO Yu-long1   

  1. 1. College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering,Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312000, China
  • Received:2019-06-18 Revised:2019-10-21 Online:2020-06-19 Published:2020-06-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51579078, 51679070) and the Collaborative Innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Mountain Geological Hazards of Zhejiang Province (PCMGH-2017-Z-02).

摘要: 在复杂应力和长期渗流侵蚀作用下岩体裂隙的表面形貌不断发生改变,导致岩体裂隙的渗流特性演化机理更加复杂。开展不同粗糙程度的石灰岩裂隙渗透试验,对比试验结果和渗透试验前后裂隙表面形貌特征,分析应力和渗流侵蚀耦合作用对粗糙裂隙表面形貌的改造影响,研究其渗流特性的演变规律。结果表明,在应力作用下粗糙程度不同的裂隙其渗流量随时间均呈现先快速减小,后趋于稳定的变化规律;不同粗糙度裂隙的等效水力隙宽和渗透率在试验初始时刻基近相等,随后均呈不断减小的趋势,但在应力和渗流侵蚀耦合作用下裂隙表面粗糙度越大,其等效水力隙宽和渗透率的下降幅值越大,试验结束时其稳定值越小;粗糙起伏程度小的裂隙,其渗流路径较均匀,流线平直,而粗糙起伏程度大的裂隙,表面出现沟槽流现象,渗流路径曲折延长;当裂隙表面粗糙凹凸体增多,与渗透水流的接触面积增大,应力和渗流侵蚀作用对裂隙表面形貌的溶蚀改造增强,使表面整体形态更粗糙起伏,而表面形态影响其渗流路径,致使裂隙表面沟槽流现象加剧,反过来影响裂隙渗流特性的演变规律。

关键词: 岩体裂隙, 渗流特性, 应力?渗流侵蚀耦合作用, 粗糙度系数

Abstract: The surface morphology of rock mass cracks is constantly changing under complex stress and long-term seepage erosion, which leads to more complicated evolution mechanism of seepage characteristics of rock mass fissures. The fluid flow experiments in different roughness limestone fractures were conducted. The effect of coupled stress-fluid flow erosion on the surface morphologies of rough fractures was analyzed according to the experimental results and the comparison of fractures surface morphology characteristics before and after fluid flow experiments, and permeability evolution of rough rock fractures was studied. The results show that the seepage discharge of different roughness fractures decreased rapidly in the initial stage of the experiment and then tended to stable with time under the action of stress. The equivalent hydraulic aperture and permeability of different roughness fractures were approximately equal in the initial stage of the experiment, and then continue to decrease. But under the coupling of stress and seepage erosion, the fractures surface was rougher, the decrease amplitude of equivalent hydraulic aperture and permeability was greater, the stable value was smaller at the end of the experiment. The fracture with small roughness had uniform seepage path and straight streamline, while the fracture with large roughness appeared groove flow and its seepage path was more tortuous and extended. The more the number of convex bodies on the fractures surface was, the greater the area for fluid flow was, and the stronger the erosion modification effect of stress and seepage erosion on the fractures surface morphology was. The above change of surface morphology aggravated the groove flow of the fracture surface and affected the permeability evolution of fractures in turn.

Key words: rock fracture, permeability, stress-seepage erosion coupling, roughness coefficient

中图分类号: TU452
[1] 李永威, 徐林荣, 傅金阳, 商拥辉, . 列车荷载作用下铁路路基填料渗透破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 299-308.
[2] 崔溦, 裴介渲, 江志安, . 动水作用下岩体裂隙中颗粒运动规律的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2870-2878.
[3] 刘宏伟, 陈世江, 许有俊, 张旭, 鲍先凯, . 基于Weierstrass-Mandelbrot函数的岩体裂隙映射重构[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3058-3070.
[4] 王文东, 邓华锋, 李建林, 冯云杰, 李冠野, 齐豫, . 基于有效受剪面积的节理面吻合度量化方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 249-258.
[5] 甘磊, 刘玉, 张宗亮, 沈振中, 马洪影, . 岩体裂隙粗糙度表征及其对裂隙渗流特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1585-1592.
[6] 田霄, 叶祖洋, 罗旺, . 岩体裂隙几何结构对其渗流传热特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3512-3521.
[7] 彭守建, 王瑞芳, 许江, 甘青青, 蔡果良, . 二次炭化温度对热压型煤力学性质 及微观结构影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1221-1229.
[8] 侯钦宽, 雍睿, 杜时贵, 徐敏娜, 曹泽敏. 结构面粗糙度统计测量最小样本数确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1259-1269.
[9] 付宏渊, 蒋煌斌, 邱祥, 姬云鹏, . 低应力与覆水环境下单裂隙粉砂质泥岩渗流特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 3840-3850.
[10] 王明玉, 刘庆哲, 曲辞晓, 李金柱, . 基于圆盘裂隙物理模型的岩体单一 裂隙渗流规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3523-3530.
[11] 段玲玲, 邓华锋, 齐豫, 李冠野, 彭萌. 水-岩作用下单裂隙灰岩渗流特性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3671-3679.
[12] 李博, 黄嘉伦, 钟振, 邹良超, . 三维交叉裂隙渗流传质特性数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3670-3768.
[13] 王鹏飞, 谭文辉, 马学文, 李子建, 刘景军, 武洋帆, . 不同粗糙度和隙宽贯通充填裂隙 渗流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3062-3070.
[14] 张天军, 庞明坤, 蒋兴科, 彭文清, 纪翔, . 负压对抽采钻孔孔周煤体瓦斯渗流特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2517-2524.
[15] 郑安兴, 罗先启, 陈振华, . 基于扩展有限元法的岩体水力劈裂耦合模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 799-808.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!