岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 168-176.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0736

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

侧向有限越流承压含水层中非完整井非 稳定流模型及解析解

冯庆高1,蔡兵华2,冯晓腊1,袁祥1   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学(武汉) 工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074;2. 武汉市市政建设集团有限公司,湖北 武汉 430023
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-30 修回日期:2020-09-28 出版日期:2021-01-11 发布日期:2021-01-06
  • 作者简介:冯庆高,男,1983年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土及地下工程方面的科研与教学工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41702336);武汉市市政建设集团有限公司科研项目(No. wszky201820)

Analytical solutions of transient flow model for a partially penetrating well in a finite leaky confined aquifer system

FENG Qing-gao1, CAI Bing-hua2, FENG Xiao-la1, YUAN Xiang1   

  1. 1. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 2. Wuhan Municipal Construction Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430023, China
  • Received:2020-05-30 Revised:2020-09-28 Online:2021-01-11 Published:2021-01-06
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41702336) and the Research Project for Wuhan Municipal Construction Group Co., Ltd. (wszky201820).

摘要: 工程建设中当距离抽水井r = rb处水位基本没有变化或不受抽水影响时,或当此处存在止水帷幕时,含水层系统视为侧向有限延伸,rb为有限半径。为此,构建更加符合工程实际的侧向有限延伸的典型弱透水层?承压水层系统中非完整井非稳定流计算模型,同时考虑井径和井储效应的影响,应用Laplace变换和分离变量法得到了水位降深在拉氏空间下的解析解,并应用拉氏数值逆变换Stehfest法得到真实空间下的水位降深。新建立的解析解可以进一步退化为诸多已有解,并进一步将其与已知解和有限元数值解进行对比,验证了所得解的正确性和可靠性。基于新建解重点分析了侧向边界和井的完整性对承压水层水位降深的影响。结果表明:含水层系统的侧向有限边界仅对抽水后期的水位降深影响明显,含水层系统侧向无限延伸情况下的水位降深要大于情形1(在r = rb处为定水头边界)且明显小于情形2(在r = rb处为不透水边界)下的水位降深,rb越小,两者之间的误差越大;抽水井的完整性对整个抽水期间不同情形下的水位降深均有明显的影响,承压含水层顶板处的水位降深随着抽水井滤管的长度和埋深的增加而减小。

关键词: 非完整井, 越流承压含水层, 侧向边界, 解析解, 非稳定流

Abstract: When there is invariant/uninfluenced pumping drawdown and waterproof curtain at a distance r =rb from the pumping well, the aquifer system is laterally finite in extend (termed finite aquifer) and rb is termed ‘finite radius’. A practical calculation model of transient flow to a partially penetrating well in a typical aquitard-confined aquifer of finite extent is developed. Also, the model considers the effect of well radius and wellbore storage. The drawdown solution is obtained by the Laplace transform coupled with separation of variables, and inverted into the time-domain solution utilizing the Stehfest method. Moreover, the obtained solutions can reduce to some available solutions and are further validated by comparison with other solutions. Finally, the effect of the lateral boundary and well configuration on pumped aquifer drawdown behaviors are analyzed based on the proposed analytical solution. The results show that the influence of the lateral boundary is obvious during the late pumping time, the drawdown of the finite aquifer system is larger than that for Case 1 (constant head boundary at r = rb) and much smaller than that for Case 2 (no-flux boundary at r = rb). A smaller finite radius rb results in a larger error between the finite aquifer system (Case 1/Case 2) and the infinite aquifer system. The impact of the well configurations occurs at the whole pumping stage for different cases, and the drawdown at the top of the pumped aquifer becomes smaller with the increase of the length and location of the well screen.

Key words: partially penetrating well, leaky confined aquifer, lateral (radial) boundary, analytical solution, non-steady flow

中图分类号: TU 470
[1] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[2] 周航, 汪义圣, 亓戈平, . 黏弹性土中异形桩横向动力响应半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 761-774.
[3] 金磊, 李晶晶, 李新明, 孙翰卿, . 柔性边界的有限差分法−离散元法模拟及其对砂土三轴固结排水和不排水剪切特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 980-990.
[4] 王浩, 侯泓冰, 江文豪, . 考虑根系对水文特性影响下非饱和植被土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3329-3345.
[5] 张智卿, 刘鑫, 刘开富, 吴君涛, 吴文兵, . 横观各向同性土体中端承桩水平振动特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3371-3382.
[6] 江学辉, 颜建伟, 罗文俊, 李佳宝, 徐长节. 纵向压力和加固钢板对隧道力学性能影响的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1623-1632.
[7] 王亦炀, 李传勋, 李阔, 陆向综. 竖井地基大应变非线性固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1446-1456.
[8] 刘景锦, 罗学思, 雷华阳, 郑刚, 罗昊鹏, . 等应变条件下增压式真空预压固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 809-821.
[9] 高柳, 吕述晖, 王奎华, . 缺陷桩-梁系统的动力特性应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3095-3104.
[10] 张玉国, 杨文兵, 赵雅纯, 王闯, 赵亚敏. 双向渗流下考虑应力时空效应的组合桩复合地基固结理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 184-196.
[11] 余俊, 李东凯, 和振, 张志中. 带有两端防渗墙坝基的各向异性渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2381-2388.
[12] 黄娟, 和振, 余俊, 杨鑫歆. 渗透各向异性圆形围堰稳态渗流场解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1035-1043.
[13] 郑长杰, 崔亦秦, 吴琛, 罗通, 栾鲁宝, . 竖向入射S波作用下单桩水平地震响应简化解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 327-336.
[14] 余俊, 张志中, 郑靖凡, 和振. 水位波动条件下有封底基坑渗流场孔压解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3415-3423.
[15] 余俊, 张扬, 郑靖凡, 张志中. 考虑潜水面的基坑二维稳态渗流场解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3109-3116.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!