岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 2647-2658.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0095

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

动静组合加载下砂岩破坏机制 及裂纹密度试验研究

王伟1, 2, 3,梁渲钰1, 2, 3,张明涛1, 2, 3,贾泽钰2,张思怡2,王奇智4   

  1. 1. 石家庄铁道大学 省部共建交通工程结构力学行为与系统安全国家重点实验室,河北 石家庄 050043;2. 石家庄铁道大学 道路与铁道工程安全保障教育部重点实验室,河北 石家庄 050043;3. 石家庄铁道大学 河北省金属矿山安全高效开采技术创新中心,河北 石家庄 050043; 4. 河北科技大学 建筑工程学院,河北 石家庄 050018
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-15 修回日期:2021-07-07 出版日期:2021-10-11 发布日期:2021-10-18
  • 通讯作者: 张明涛,男,1994年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩石动力学及低渗透砂岩铀资源高效开采的研究。E-mail: 2868992828@qq.com E-mail:wangweiuuu@163.com
  • 作者简介:王伟,男,1978年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事工程地质灾害防控及深部资源高效开采的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51979170,No. U1967208);河北省自然科学基金(No. E2021210128,No. E2020208071)。

Experimental study on failure mechanism and crack density of sandstone under combined dynamic and static loading

WANG Wei1, 2, 3, LIANG Xuan-yu1, 2, 3, ZHANG Ming-tao1, 2, 3, JIA Ze-yu2, ZHANG Si-yi2, WANG Qi-zhi4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Mechanics Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structures, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Road and Railway Engineering Safety Assurance, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 3. Hebei Metal Mine Safety and Efficient Mining Technology Center, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 4. School of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050018, China
  • Received:2021-01-15 Revised:2021-07-07 Online:2021-10-11 Published:2021-10-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51979170, U1967208) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province of China (E2021210128, E2020208071).

摘要: 为探讨砂岩在动静组合加载条件下的破坏特征及损伤规律,采用三维动静组合分离式Hopkinson压杆测试系统对砂岩试样进行了多组动静组合、不同加载速率条件下的冲击试验,利用CT扫描与数字岩芯技术得到了砂岩试样内部不同截面的破坏图和损伤后试样内部的三维重构图及裂纹密度,研究了砂岩在不同受力情况下的破坏形式和破坏机制,并对轴压、围压及应变率对砂岩裂纹密度的影响规律进行了探究。试验结果表明:常规动态冲击作用下,砂岩的动态破坏形式为典型的拉伸劈裂破坏;一维动静组合加载下,砂岩的动态破坏形式为典型的压剪破坏,内部呈现出共轭双曲线形的压剪面;三维动静组合加载下,砂岩的动态破坏形式同样表现为压剪破坏,但内部破坏面为圆台(锥)形,并对不同加载条件下砂岩的动态破坏机制进行了分析。在不同加载状态下砂岩的裂纹密度随应变率的增加均呈递增趋势,轴压、围压的施加限制了裂纹的产生和增长速率,围压相对于轴压对裂纹产生和扩展的限制程度更大,并从砂岩的抗压强度和裂纹产生的补偿空间角度对其进行了解释;利用轴压、围压模拟地应力,分析了地下0、200、400、600 m处应变率对砂岩裂纹密度的影响规律,并对其进行了定量分析,若要产生同样效果的裂纹密度,地下600 m处的砂岩所需应变率大约是无地应力状态下的3.4倍。从裂纹密度角度构建了不同加载状态下损伤变量和应变率之间的量化关系式,该研究结果可为无临空面爆破开采过程中不同爆炸应力波与岩石内部裂纹开展程度的量化问题提供了参考。

关键词: 砂岩, 动静组合加载, CT扫描, 破坏机制, 应变率, 裂纹密度

Abstract: In order to investigate the failure characteristics and damage law of sandstone under the combined dynamic and static loading conditions, three-dimensional movement combination loading test system with separate Hopkinson compressive bar is applied to perform impact tests on sandstone samples under the condition of multiple combinations of dynamic and static state and different loading rates. CT scan and digital core technology are also used to observe the failure diagrams of different sections in the sandstone sample, and the three-dimensional reconstruction diagram and crack density in the damaged sample are obtained. The failure forms and failure mechanism of sandstone under different stress conditions are studied, and the effects of axial pressure, confining pressure and strain rate on the crack density of sandstone are explored. The test results show that the dynamic failure of sandstone is typical tensile splitting failure under the action of conventional dynamic impact. Under one-dimensional combined dynamic and static loading, the dynamic failure mode of sandstone is typical compression and shear failure, and the interior presents a conjugated double curved compression and shear surface. Under three-dimensional dynamic and static loading, the dynamic failure mode of sandstone is also compression and shear failure, but the internal failure surface is circular (cone) shape. The dynamic failure mechanism of sandstone under different loading conditions is analyzed. Under different loading conditions, the crack density of sandstone increases with the increase of strain rate. The application axial compression and confining pressure restrict the crack generation and growth rate, and the confining pressure has a greater limitation on the crack generation than the axial pressure. It is explained from the perspective of compressive strength and compensation space for crack generation of sandstone. The influence of strain rate on the crack density of sandstone at 0, 200, 400 m and 600 m underground is analyzed quantitatively by using axial compression and confining pressure to simulate the in-situ stress. To produce the same crack density, the strain rate of sandstone at 600 m underground is about 3.4 times that of sandstone without in-situ stress. The quantitative relationship between damage variables and strain rates under different loading conditions is established from the perspective of crack density. The research results can provide a reference for quantification of different explosion stress waves and the development degree of internal crack in rock during blasting mining without facing surface.

Key words: sandstone, combined static and dynamic loads, CT scan, failure mechanism, strain rate, crack density

中图分类号: TU 458
[1] 杨烜宇, 王勇, . 考虑不同凸起体宽度的规则形态土−岩界面剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 195-204.
[2] 秦立科, 郭瑞琦, 赵皓辰, 甄刚, 王琦, . 环境蒸发条件下石质文物毛细水动态分布规律影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 354-365.
[3] 张胜, 柏巍, 徐鼎平, 郑虹, 江权, 李志伟, 向天兵, . 循环荷载作用下砂岩损伤演化的声发射与电阻率监测及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 53-66.
[4] 张春瑞, 纪洪广, 付桢, 张月征, 宋宇, 田竹华, 范文博, . 白云石对粉砂岩物理力学性质影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2661-2675.
[5] 雷瑞德, 顾清恒, 胡超, 贺培, 周林森, . 裂隙砂岩声发射信号特征及破裂前兆识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2023-2038.
[6] 倪祖甲, 乔江美, 张俊楷, 唐旭海, . 基于微观岩石力学试验及精确矿物晶体建模的砂岩力学性质及波速分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1865-1880.
[7] 吴青钱, 石露, 李小春, 白冰, . 水/超临界CO2对低黏土含量砂岩力学性质影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1442-1454.
[8] 王桂林, 王力, 王润秋, 任甲山, . 干湿循环后贯通型锯齿状红砂岩节理面剪切本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 706-720.
[9] 吕志涛, 朱小宝, 罗嗣成, 夏才初, 曾祥太, . 砂岩多周期累积冻融变形特性及其微观机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 389-401.
[10] 吕志涛, 赵志远, 蔡毅, 夏才初, 段君义. 单向冻融作用下砂岩力学各向异性演化与损伤模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3421-3430.
[11] 杨松, 王俊光, 韦忠跟, 辛天宇, 梁冰, 王立轩, 任凌冉. 衰减振荡扰动下砂岩蠕变特性与模型初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3485-3500.
[12] 陈石, 呼怀刚, 胡大伟, 杨福见, 周辉, 周玉玲, . 岩芯自适应连续刻划试验技术研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3302-3314.
[13] 田雷, 谢强, 段军, 陶富涛, 班宇鑫, 傅翔, 晏彬淇, . 三向斜锚短桩基础拉拔荷载作用下桩锚节点的受力特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 278-288.
[14] 李永威, 徐林荣, 傅金阳, 商拥辉, . 列车荷载作用下铁路路基填料渗透破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 299-308.
[15] 吴鹏, 陈健, 付晓东, 黄珏皓, . 循环荷载作用下干燥与饱和泥质粉砂岩变形特性及其能量演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 195-207.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!