岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 565-573.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0980

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

软土地层基坑开挖扰动及土体再压缩变形研究

鲁泰山1, 2,刘松玉1, 2,蔡国军1, 2,吴恺1, 2,夏文俊3   

  1. 1. 东南大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京 211189;2. 东南大学 江苏省城市地下工程与环境安全重点实验室,江苏 南京 211189; 3. 江苏省交通工程建设局,江苏 南京 210004
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-09 修回日期:2020-11-14 出版日期:2021-02-10 发布日期:2021-02-09
  • 通讯作者: 刘松玉,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地基处理及原位测试等方面的研究。E-mail: liusy@seu.edu.cn E-mail:230189653@ seu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:鲁泰山,男,1996年生,博士研究生,主要从事原位测试方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41972269);江苏省交通工程建设局科技项目(No. CX-2019GC02)。

Study on the disturbance and recompression settlement of soft soil induced by foundation excavation

LU Tai-shan1, 2, LIU Song-yu1, 2, CAI Guo-jun1, 2, WU Kai1, 2, XIA Wen-jun3   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China; 2. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering and Environmental Safety, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China; 3. Jiangsu Provincial Transportation Engineering and Construction Bureau, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210004, China
  • Received:2020-07-09 Revised:2020-11-14 Online:2021-02-10 Published:2021-02-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41972269) and the Project of Jiangsu Provincal Transportation Engineering Construction Bureau (CX-2019GC02).

摘要: 软土地层基坑开挖会对坑底土体产生严重扰动,受开挖扰动影响,坑底土体应力状态和力学性质将发生变化。因此,正确评价开挖扰动程度及扰动对土体工程性质的影响十分重要。通过对现有施工扰动评价方法的总结,以太湖隧道基坑工程为例,采用有限元模拟方法研究了不同开挖深度下坑底中心土体扰动度分布规律及强扰动区深度。进一步,以不排水抗剪强度为评价指标,建立了基于孔压静力触探(CPTU)锥尖阻力的黏性土开挖扰动评价方法,并与有限元扰动评价结果进行了对比,取得了较为一致的结果。最后,采用考虑土体扰动的沉降计算方法,结合有限元扰动度计算结果,对不同基底附加应力下坑底扰动土体的沉降变形进行了计算。计算结果表明,扰动会显著增加地基沉降量,当基底附加应力从100 kPa增加至150 kPa时,考虑土体扰动的地基沉降量与不考虑土体扰动的地基沉降量比值将从1.43增加至2.24。

关键词: 软土, 基坑开挖, 扰动, 孔压静力触探, 沉降

Abstract: The deep excavation of foundation pit in soft soil layer will cause serious disturbance to the soil at the bottom of the pit. Affected by excavation disturbance, the mechanical properties and stress state of the soil at the bottom of the pit will change. Hence, it is important to accurately evaluate the degree of soil disturbance caused by excavation and the influence of disturbance on soil mechanical properties. Based on the summary of the existing evaluation methods of soil disturbance, taking the foundation pit excavation of Taihu tunnel as an example, the distribution of disturbance degree and the depth of strong disturbed zone of soil under the center of the pit bottom under different excavation depths were studied by using the finite element simulation method. Then, taking the undrained shear strength as an evaluation index, a method for evaluating excavation disturbance of clayey soil based on the cone tip resistance in the piezocone penetration test (CPTU) was established. The soil disturbance calculated through cone tip resistance was agreeable with that determined by numerical calculation. Finally, combined with the soil disturbance determined by the finite element method, the settlement of disturbed soil at the bottom of the pit under different base additional stresses was calculated considering the settlement of soil disturbance. The results showed that the soil disturbance would cause a significant increase in the base settlement. When the base additional stress increased from 100 kPa to 150 kPa, the ratio of base settlement with soil disturbance to that without soil disturbance would increase from 1.43 to 2.24.

Key words: soft soil, excavation, disturbance, piezocone penetration test, settlement

中图分类号: TU 45
[1] 冯德銮, 余洋, 梁仕华. 碱激发地聚物固化滨海软土的强度和水稳定性研究进展与评述[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 13-39.
[2] 潘申鑫, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 刘先峰, 何梓雷, 曹丽君, 周诗广, . 高速铁路整体刚性面板加筋土挡墙地震作用下服役性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 519-530.
[3] 童佳荣, 张曙, 李荣, 夏彬桐, 王宁伟, . 电动化学加固技术对珠海软土改性的机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 262-270.
[4] 张治国, 陈胤吉, 朱正国, 魏纲, 孙苗苗, . 软土小曲率盾构隧道开挖诱发黏弹性地层沉降的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 309-321.
[5] 李培楠, 刘学, 戴泽余, 翟一欣, 张弛, 寇晓勇, 范杰, 甄亮, 王长虹, . 曲线顶管底幕法水下沉船打捞顶推力计算模型与施工扰动分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 403-418.
[6] 鲍树峰, 董志良, 莫海鸿, 张劲文, 于立婷, 刘攀, 刘晓强, 侯明勋, . 浮泥−流泥静态间歇沉降与低压固结沉降计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2763-2772.
[7] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[8] 王长虹, 蔡德雍, 胡子轩, 杨天笑. 扰动状态下束浆挤扩桩抗拔机制与计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2980-2994.
[9] 宋牧原, 杨明辉, 陈伟, 卢贤锥, . 基于自注意力-循环神经网络模型的盾构引发的土体沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2613-2625.
[10] 赖丰文, 刘松玉, 蔡国军, 鲁泰山, 李洪江, 段伟, . 基于孔压静力触探原位测试的基坑围护结构变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2650-2660.
[11] 吴盾, 孙林, 陆建伟, 于秉坤, 蔡国军, . 火壤工程地质原位探测技术研究进展与孔压静力触探应用展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2308-2324.
[12] 崔纪飞, 吴祯祯, 李林, 饶平平, . 考虑土体流变的新旧混合群桩变刚度调平研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1897-1906.
[13] 杨校辉, 赵子毅, 郭楠, 钱豹, 朱彦鹏, . 横观各向同性非饱和黄土蠕变特性及沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1489-1500.
[14] 杨少朋, 杨爱武, 许福军, . 改性纤维排水板真空预压加固吹填软土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 789-797.
[15] 蒋新彧, 征西遥, 吴俊, 杨爱武, 李博, . HNO3和H2SO4侵蚀作用下地质聚合物固化软土的抗酸性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 851-866.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!