岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 833-845.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0741

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

上海土体小应变硬化模型整套参数取值方法及工程验证

顾晓强1, 2,吴瑞拓1, 2,梁发云1, 2,高广运1, 2   

  1. 1. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 岩土与地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-31 修回日期:2020-12-30 出版日期:2021-03-11 发布日期:2021-03-17
  • 作者简介:顾晓强,男,1981年生,博士,教授,主要从事土的基本特性、土动力学和宏微观土力学等方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51822809,No.51738010);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(No.22120200074)

On HSS model parameters for Shanghai soils with engineering verification

GU Xiao-qiang1, 2, WU Rui-tuo1, 2, LIANG Fa-yun1, 2, GAO Guang-yun1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2020-05-31 Revised:2020-12-30 Online:2021-03-11 Published:2021-03-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51822809, 51738010) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(22120200074).

摘要: 小应变硬化(HSS)模型能较合理考虑土体小应变阶段的非线性、应力相关等特性,在隧道和基坑开挖等变形数值计算中得到了广泛的应用,但目前对模型整套参数的合理取值尚缺乏系统地研究。剖析了HSS模型各参数的意义和对应的试验方法,并基于大量室内和现场试验数据建立了上海土体HSS模型主要参数与土体孔隙比的经验关系,为实际工程利用勘察报告方便且较准确地确定HSS模型参数提供了合理途径。通过多个深基坑工程的数值分析表明,采用现场试验确定的小应变初始剪切模量时,围护墙水平位移计算值和实测值基本吻合,表明提出的上海土体HSS模型整套参数取值方法有很好的普适性和工程实用价值,也为其他地区建立类似的HSS模型参数取值方法提供了借鉴。

关键词: 基坑工程, 变形分析, 小应变特性, 小应变模型, 参数取值

Abstract: The hardening strain model with small strain (HSS) can appropriately consider the nonlinear and stress-dependent behavior of soils at small strain range. Thus, it is widely used for deformation predictions during pit and tunnel excavations. However, currently there is a lack of systematic study on how to reasonably and conveniently determine all the model parameters. This paper firstly introduces the definitions of all the HSS model parameters and their measurements. Based on the statistics of laboratory and field test data, the relationships between the model parameters and the void ratio of Shanghai soils are proposed, which can be conveniently used in engineering practice. Finally, the HSS model with parameters determined by the proposed method is used to analyze the deformation in four excavation cases. The results show that with the field measured small strain shear stiffness, the calculated lateral deformations of the retaining wall agree well with the measurements. It indicates that the proposed method for determining the HSS model parameters is appropriate and it can provide references for similar projects in Shanghai and similar regions.

Key words: excavation, deformation analysis, small strain properties, HSS model, parameter determination

中图分类号: U655.54
[1] 娄旭龙, 张泽瑞, 孔德琼, 陈星潮, 朱斌, . 深海重型管道管土相互作用大变形极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3234-3242.
[2] 张振波, 李秉欣, 杨茜, 刘志春, 刘义, . 近接基坑工程有限土体失稳模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 266-277.
[3] 易顺, 陈健, 潘家军, 王艳丽, 徐晗, 刘春鹏, . 内撑式基坑围护结构水平变形的表征函数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 568-578.
[4] 王祖乐, 孔德琼, 杜越明, 朱斌, . 岩土工程连续极限分析方法拓展与验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3531-3540.
[5] 肖明清, 徐晨, 杨剑, 吴佳明, 付晓东, 周永强, . 基于连续-非连续分析理论的隧道围岩破坏区判识方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3099-3108.
[6] 彭文哲, 赵明华, 杨超炜, 刘亚楠. 基于有限杆单元法的斜桩受力变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 650-657.
[7] 周勇, 赵元基, 王正振, . 基于土体强度冗余法的桩锚支护结构 动态稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 641-649.
[8] 吴佳明, 陈健, 陈国良, 钟宇, . 基于BIM技术的地铁基坑工程施工仿真模拟方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 553-566.
[9] 时振昊, 黄茂松, 倪雨萍, . 基于颗粒间应变的饱和黏土小应变各向异性 非线性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1036-1044.
[10] 巩师林, 凌道盛, 胡成宝, 钮家军, . 非连续变形分析中块体大转动问题研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3810-3822.
[11] 余 瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
[12] 徐栋栋, 邬爱清, 李 聪, 汪 斌, 蒋昱州, 曾 平, 杨永涛, . 破裂全过程模拟的改进非连续变形分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1169-1178.
[13] 赵强, 焦玉勇, 张秀丽, 谢壁婷, 王龙, 黄刚海, . 基于显式时间积分的球颗粒DDA计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4515-4522.
[14] 刘永权,刘新荣,谢应坤,余 瑜, . 基坑预应力锚索初始张拉锁定值取值规律探讨[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2164-2174.
[15] 李连祥,符庆宏,黄佳佳, . 砂土地基和粉质黏土地基基坑悬臂开挖离心模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 529-536.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!