岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 991-1002.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.2117

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

结构性花岗岩残积土三轴试验研究

汪华斌1,周宇1,余刚1, 2,周博1,张爱军3   

  1. 1. 华中科技大学 土木工程与力学学院,湖北 武汉 430074;2. 中南建筑设计院股份有限公司,湖北 武汉 430071; 3. 深圳路桥建设集团有限公司工程技术中心,广东 深圳 518024
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-15 修回日期:2020-08-10 出版日期:2021-04-12 发布日期:2021-04-25
  • 通讯作者: 周博,男,1987年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土介质材料多尺度力学行为的试验与模拟研究方面的工作。E-mail: zhoubohust@hust.edu.cn E-mail:huabin@mail.hust.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:汪华斌,男,1968年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土与地下工程安全性评价与控制理论及应用、滑(边)坡灾害风险管理等。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41931286,No. 41877233,No. 41672267);深圳市技术攻关项目(重No.20170324)。

A triaxial test study on structural granite residual soil

WANG Hua-bin1, ZHOU Yu1, YU Gang1, 2, ZHOU Bo1, ZHANG Ai-jun3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 2. Central-South Architectural Design Institute Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 3. Engineering Technology Center of Shenzhen Road & Bridge Group, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518024, China
  • Received:2019-12-15 Revised:2020-08-10 Online:2021-04-12 Published:2021-04-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41931286, 41877233, 41672267) and the Key Technologies R & D Program of Shenzhen (20170324).

摘要: 花岗岩残积土作为一种特殊土,在我国东南地区分布广泛,但其特殊的结构特性使得该类土体的工程事故频发。针对广东省肇庆市播植县某边坡残积土进行了一系列三轴试验,研究结构性花岗岩残积土在三轴应力状态时的应变和孔压变化特征,以及结构性花岗岩残积土的剪切结构性屈服特性,为相关工程提供借鉴。三轴压缩试验分别针对原状土、重塑正常固结土和重塑超固结土,试验结果表明,原状土和重塑超固结土均表现出一定的结构性,排水剪切时均表现出明显的剪胀性,应力?应变曲线均表现出应变软化,不排水剪切的超静孔压均为先增大后减小,但原状土超静孔压减小的幅度更大;超固结土的不排水抗剪强度符合SHANSEP理论,试验常数 为0.67;重塑正常固结土的归一化刚度随着加载的进行缓慢减小, =15%左右时完全屈服;原状土和重塑超固结土的归一化刚度曲线不能重合,分别于 =1.5%和 =1%左右发生结构性屈服,并且均在 =15%左右发生整体破坏,围压越大,结构性土的刚度曲线变化规律越接近于扰动土。

关键词: 花岗岩残积土, 三轴试验, 切向刚度, 结构性表征

Abstract: As a kind of special soil, granite residual soil is widely distributed in the southeastern part of China and usually leads to engineering accidents due to its special structure. In this paper, a series of triaxle tests was conducted on the slope residual soil from Bozhi County, Zhaoqing City, Guangdong Province, to study the strain and pore pressure characteristics of structural granite residual soil under triaxial stress state as well as the structural yield characteristics of granite residual soil, which could provide useful reference for corresponding projects. Triaxial compression tests were conducted on undisturbed soil, remolded normal consolidated soil and remolded over-consolidated soil. The results showed that both undisturbed soil and remolded over-consolidated soil had certain structural characteristics, and had an obvious dilatancy during the drained shear test. The stress-strain curves of both undisturbed soil and remolded over-consolidated soil showed strain softening. The excess pore pressure of both undisturbed soil and remolded over-consolidated soil increased first and then decreased during the undrained shear test, while the excess pore pressure of undisturbed soil decreased more. The undrained shear strength of over-consolidated soil was consistent with the SHANSEP theory and the test constant was 0.67. The normalized stiffness of remolded normal consolidated soil decreased slowly with loading process going on, and it yielded completely when =15%. The normalized stiffness curves of undisturbed soil and remolded over-consolidated soil were not consistent with each other, and the structural yielding occurs at =1.5% and =1% respectively, and the overall failure occurs at =15%. In addition, the larger the confining pressure was, the more similar the structural curve of the structural soil was to the disturbed soil.

Key words: granite residual soil, triaxial test, tangent stiffness, structural characterization

中图分类号: TU 441
[1] 董林, 陈强, 夏坤, 李彦苍, 李燕, 王晓磊. 细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 228-237.
[2] 黄德昕, 温韬, 陈宁生, . 考虑能量演化的岩石残余强度确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2825-2836.
[3] 徐卫卫, 谢遵党, 傅中志, 米占宽, . 粗粒土真三轴试验南水模型研究及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2559-2572.
[4] 陈嘉瑞, 樊宝云, 叶剑红, 张春顺, . 钙质砂颗粒破碎特性及破碎演化模型三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2095-2105.
[5] 胡丰慧, 方祥位, 申春妮, 王春艳, 邵生俊, . 真三轴条件下珊瑚砂颗粒破碎、强度和剪胀性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2147-2159.
[6] 高品红, 高晨博, 彭成威, 刘飞禹, . 降雨作用下花岗岩残积土边坡模型试验及离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1632-1642.
[7] 尚召伟, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 王斐, 黎澄生, . 非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性与其持水特征曲线确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1131-1140.
[8] 张涛艺, 王家全, 林志南, 唐毅, . 细粒含量对砾性土路基劣化及静力剪切特性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1141-1152.
[9] 王梦洁, 张莎莎, 杨晓华, 张超, 晏长根, . 循环荷载作用下漫灌区粉质黏土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1215-1227.
[10] 王滢, 刘嘉怡, 高盟, 孔祥霄, . 地震作用下深海含气能源土动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 457-466.
[11] 王泽驰, 邵帅, 邵生俊, 吴昊, 张彬, 张少英. 真三轴力-水路径下原状黄土增湿变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3451-3461.
[12] 蒋剑青, 罗敏华, 胡诗红, 柳志灏, . 断续节理产状对砂岩破坏特征影响的真三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3077-3092.
[13] 屈俊童, 王文彬, 屈林河, . 基于二元介质简化模型的滇池湖相沉积典型冻结泥炭质土力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 233-243.
[14] 李宗恩, 刘星炎, 郑青松, 胡琪, 潘乾通, . 连通率对不同倾角结构面岩样力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 244-256.
[15] 肖思奇, 黄科锋, 周红波, . 基于动三轴试验的软黏土软化系数的分析与预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 133-146.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!