岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 1839-1849.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1848

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

刚性墙后有限宽度土体被动滑裂面特征试验研究

王崇宇1, 2,刘晓平1,张家强1,曹周红1   

  1. 1. 长沙理工大学 水利工程学院,湖南 长沙 410114;2. 湖南省水务规划设计院有限公司,湖南 长沙 410008
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-09 修回日期:2021-04-07 出版日期:2021-07-12 发布日期:2021-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘晓平,男,1956年生,硕士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事工程结构及地基基础工程方面的研究。E-mail: lxplyt@163.com E-mail: 273053581@qq.com
  • 作者简介:王崇宇,男,1983年生,博士研究生,高级工程师,主要从事结构与土相互作用方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51309037);湖南省重点实验室基金项目(No. 2018DT04)

Experimental study on passive slip surface of limited width soil behind a rigid wall

WANG Chong-yu1, 2, LIU Xiao-ping1, ZHANG Jia-qiang1, CAO Zhou-hong1   

  1. 1. School of Hydraulic Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, China; 2. Hunan Water Planning & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Changsha, Hunan 410008, China
  • Received:2020-12-09 Revised:2021-04-07 Online:2021-07-12 Published:2021-07-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51309037) and Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory Fund Project (2018DT04).

摘要: 利用无黏性粗砂开展刚性墙后有限宽度被动土体模型试验,采用高速相机监测了试验过程的土体变形图像,基于数字图像相关法对土体变形、剪切应变进行了分析,以揭示平动(T模式)、绕墙顶转动(RT模式)、绕墙底转动(RB模式)3种变位模式下土体滑裂面的特征。结果表明:有限被动宽度土体宽高比(B/H)界限值为T模式B/H≤2.0、RT模式B/H≤1.6、RB模式B/H≤1.1;T模式下,当1.6≤B/H≤2.0时,被动滑裂面由两个不连续的破裂面组成,下、上破裂面起点分别为移动挡墙墙踵、固定挡墙墙顶,当1.10≤B/H≤1.35时,滑裂面为一条曲面,两端点分别为移动挡墙墙踵、固定挡墙墙顶,当B/H≤0.75时,滑裂面为多条直线组成的“反射折线”,由移动挡墙、固定挡墙为起点的滑裂线与水平夹角差别明显;RT模式下,被动滑裂面为移动挡墙墙踵后H/4点、固定挡墙墙顶两点形成的曲面;RB模式下,被动滑裂面以固定挡墙墙顶为起点,向移动挡墙墙身中部延伸,延伸点高度随B/H减少逐步抬高。

关键词: 模型试验, 有限宽度土体, 被动土体, 不同变位模式, 滑裂面, 无黏性粗砂

Abstract: A model experiment of passive soil with limited width behind a rigid retaining wall was carried out using non-cohesive coarse sand, with the soil images during the experiment collected through a high-speed camera. In addition, the soil deformation and shear strain were analyzed based on the digital image correlation method to reveal the slip surface characteristics in 3 movement modes: translational mode (T mode), rotate-about-top mode (RT mode), rotate-about-base mode (RB mode). The results show that: the boundary value of width to height ratio (B/H) of soil with finite passive width is, B/H≤2.0 for T mode, B/H≤1.6 for RT mode and B/H≤1.1 for RB mode. In T mode, when 1.6≤B/H≤2.0, the passive slip surface is composed of two discontinuous fracture surfaces, the lower and upper fracture surfaces start from the heel of the moving retaining wall and the top of the fixed retaining wall respectively; when 1.10≤B/H≤1.35, the slip surface is a curved surface, the starting point and the end point are the heel of the moving retaining wall and the top of the fixed retaining wall respectively; when B/H≤0.75, the slip surface is a "reflective broken line" composed of multiple straight lines, and the horizontal angle between the sliding line starting from the moving retaining wall and the fixed retaining wall is obviously different. In RT mode, the passive slip surface is a curved surface which passes through the H/4 point, the heel of the moving retaining wall and the top of the fixed retaining wall; in RB mode, the passive slip surface starts from the top of the fixed retaining wall and extends to the middle of the moving retaining wall, and the height of extension point gradually increases with the decrease of B/H.

Key words: model experiment, limited width soil, passive soil, different movement modes, slip surface, non-cohesive coarse sand

中图分类号: TU 432
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[6] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[7] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[8] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[9] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[10] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[11] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[12] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[13] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[14] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[15] 孙旻洋, 王忠瑾, 谢新宇, 张日红, 娄扬, 朱大勇, . 饱和黏土中能源群桩热力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 382-390.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!