岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 65-75.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1340

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

中密风积沙地层金属装配式基础抗拔模型试 验与承载力改进计算方法

肖飞1, 2,孔令伟1, 2,刘观仕1, 2,冯衡3,董义义3,曾二贤3   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 中国电力工程顾问集团 中南电力设计院有限公司,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-14 修回日期:2021-11-04 出版日期:2022-01-10 发布日期:2022-01-06
  • 通讯作者: 孔令伟,男,1967年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事特殊土的力学特性与灾害防治技术方面的研究工作。E-mail: lwkong@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:zishengshaw@outlook.com
  • 作者简介:肖飞,男,1996年生,硕士研究生,主要从事土力学与基础工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 52179115);中国电力工程顾问集团公司中南电力设计院有限公司委托科研项目(No.DG1-T03-2018)。

Uplift model test and capacity calculation method of metal grillage foundation in medium dense aeolian sand

XIAO Fei1, 2, KONG Ling-wei1, 2, LIU Guan-shi1, 2, FENG Heng3, DONG Yi-yi3, ZENG Er-xian3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Zhongnan Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd, China Power Engineering Consulting Group, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2021-08-14 Revised:2021-11-04 Online:2022-01-10 Published:2022-01-06
  • Supported by:
    This work is supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (52179115) and Zhongnan Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd, China Power Engineering Consulting Group Commissioned Scientific Research Project (DG1-T03-2018).

摘要: 金属装配式基础因施工方便与综合造价低而被越来越多地应用于风积沙地区输电线路基础工程。针对中密风积沙开展全模和半模抗拔模型试验,研究了不同深宽比下基础的上拔荷载?位移特性和抗拔破坏模式。结果表明,抗拔荷载?位移关系曲线随着基础深宽比? 变化而改变。当? =1.0时,曲线呈缓变型;当? =2.0~5.0时,曲线呈软化型。随着? 的增大,抗拔拔承载力随之增大。在加载过程中,地表以基础顶部为中心逐渐形成近似为圆形的隆起区域,隆起程度随着上拔位移增大而不断增加,最终形成整体破坏,此时滑动面贯穿地表;通过半模试验观测的上拔土体滑动面子午线可用直线方程近似描述,且抗拔角随着? 的增大而减小。根据上述试验结果,基于Veesaert滑动面摩擦强度理论和极限平衡原理,提出了金属装配式基础的抗拔承载力改进计算方法,计算结果相较于土重法和剪切法更接近试验值,且离散程度更小。

关键词: 抗拔承载力, 金属装配式基础, 中密风积沙, 模型试验

Abstract: Metal grillage foundations are increasingly used in infrastructure of transmission line in aeolian sand areas because of its convenient construction and relatively low cost. The full-model and half-model uplift tests under the influence of embedment ratio were carried out in foundation of medium dense aeolian sand, and the uplift load-displacement properties and uplift failure mode of the foundation under different embedment ratios were studied as well. The results show that the uplift load-displacement curve relates to the embedment ratio ?: when ? is 1.0, the curve varies gradually; while ? is in the range of 2.0?5.0, the curve shows clear strain softening with a peak load. As the ? increases, the uplift capacity increases accordingly. During the loading process, an approximately circular uplift area centered on the top of the foundation developed on the ground surface gradually, the uplift degree increased as the foundation was pulled up, and finally formed an overall failure, along with the sliding surface penetrating the ground. In the half-model tests, meridians of the sliding surfaces were observable, which can be approximately described by linear equation as the uplift angle decreased with the increase of the embedment ratio. According to the above results, based on Veesaert’s sliding surface friction strength theory and the limit equilibrium principle, an improved calculation method for uplift capacity of metal grillage foundation has been proposed. Compared with the earth cone method and the shear method, the improved method can obtain calculation results closer to the experimental values with smaller dispersion.

Key words: uplift capacity, metal grillage foundation, medium dense aeolian sand, model test

中图分类号: TU 443
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 王长虹, 蔡德雍, 胡子轩, 杨天笑. 扰动状态下束浆挤扩桩抗拔机制与计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2980-2994.
[4] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[5] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[6] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[7] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[8] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[9] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[10] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[11] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[12] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[13] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[14] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[15] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!