岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11): 2933-2940.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.2193

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

分数阶黏弹性饱和地基与水平受荷群桩的 相互作用分析

艾智勇1, 2,谷甘霖1, 2,李攀聪1, 2   

  1. 1. 同济大学 土木工程学院,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-29 修回日期:2022-07-13 出版日期:2022-11-11 发布日期:2022-11-29
  • 作者简介:艾智勇,男,1966年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土及地下工程方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41672275)。

Analysis of interaction between fractional viscoelastic saturated soils and laterally loaded pile groups

AI Zhi-yong1, 2, GU Gan-lin1, 2, LI Pan-cong1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering, Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2021-12-29 Revised:2022-07-13 Online:2022-11-11 Published:2022-11-29
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41672275).

摘要: 引入Abel黏壶,对经典的三元件Merchant模型进行改进,获得可以更好地描述地基黏弹性特征的分数阶Merchant模型;运用有限单元法,将群桩离散为单桩和桩单元,通过Timoshenko梁模型模拟桩单元,组装获得群桩的总刚度矩阵方程;根据地基与群桩相互作用的耦合方程和群桩承台的受力平衡与位移协调条件,推导得到水平受荷群桩各单桩桩顶剪力与承台位移的矩阵解答;结合李氏比拟法与Laplace逆变换,最终实现对分数阶黏弹性饱和地基与水平受荷群桩相互作用问题的求解;以一组蠕变试验数据为例,简要介绍在已知地基蠕变曲线的条件下,获得其对应模型黏弹性参数的具体方法;通过与已发表成果以及ABAQUS数值算例对比,验证解答的正确性,并设计算例讨论地基黏弹性参数对群桩受力与变形的影响规律,结果表明:随着地基流变的发展,角桩与中心桩的内力差距逐渐缩小,并趋于稳定。

关键词: 分数阶Merchant模型, 黏弹性, 饱和地基, 水平受荷群桩, 相互作用

Abstract: The Abel dashpot is introduced to improve the classical three-parameter Merchant model, and a fractional Merchant model which can better describe the viscoelastic characteristics of soils is obtained. With the help of finite element method, the pile group is discretized into single piles and pile elements. The total stiffness matrix equation of the pile group can be obtained by assembling the pile elements simulated by the Timoshenko beam model. According to the interaction equation between soils and the pile group, and the equilibrium condition and the compatibility condition of the pile cap, the matrix solution of the shear force at the top of the single pile and the displacement of the pile cap is deduced. Combined with the elastic-viscoelastic correspondence principle and the Laplace inverse transformation, the problem of the interaction between fractional viscoelastic saturated soils and laterally loaded pile groups is finally solved. Taking a set of creep test data as an example, this paper briefly introduces the specific method to obtain the viscoelastic parameters of the fractional model through the creep curve. The correctness of the proposed solution is verified by comparing with the published results and ABAQUS numerical examples. Additionally, several examples are designed to discuss the effects of soil’s viscoelasticity parameters on the stress and deformation of the pile group, which shows that with the development of soil’s rheology, the internal force gap between corner piles and central piles gradually shrinks and tends to be stable.

Key words: fractional merchant model, viscoelasticity, saturated soils, laterally loaded pile groups, interaction analysis

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 张治国, 陈胤吉, 朱正国, 魏纲, 孙苗苗, . 软土小曲率盾构隧道开挖诱发黏弹性地层沉降的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 309-321.
[2] 冉龙洲, 袁松, 王希宝, 张廷彪, 刘德军, 黎良仆, . 考虑围岩−盾体−注浆体−管片相互作用的深埋护盾式隧道掘进机法隧道围岩压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 366-376.
[3] 崔纪飞, 吴祯祯, 李林, 饶平平, . 考虑土体流变的新旧混合群桩变刚度调平研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1897-1906.
[4] 可文海, 杨文海, 李源, 吴磊, . SH波作用下斜坡地形中桩基的动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[5] 周航, 汪义圣, 亓戈平, . 黏弹性土中异形桩横向动力响应半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 761-774.
[6] 王学滨, 陈双印, 郑一方, 廖裴彬, . 考虑蠕变剪裂的拉格朗日元与离散元耦合方法及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 613-624.
[7] 谢立夫, 关振长, 黄明, 丘华生, 许超. 考虑主动铰接的盾构-地层相互作用模型及求解研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3574-3584.
[8] 娄旭龙, 张泽瑞, 孔德琼, 陈星潮, 朱斌, . 深海重型管道管土相互作用大变形极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3234-3242.
[9] 马强, 杨奕琪, 周凤玺, 邵帅, . 热黏弹性介质中波的传播特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 303-314.
[10] 马建勋, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, 庞盼望, 李文枭, 闫洪祥. 考虑土−结构相互作用的地下室层对高层建筑地震反应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[11] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 潘申鑫, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 地震作用下桩板墙-锚索组合支护基覆型边坡的动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
[12] 谢森林, 胡安峰, 肖志荣, 汪美慧, 胡训健, 陈俞超, . 基于广义Voigt模型的半渗透边界隧道周围饱和软土固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2024-2036.
[13] 周攀, 李镜培, 李盼盼, 刘耕云, 张超哲, . 基于界面本构模型的砂土中单桩荷载−沉降响应预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1686-1698.
[14] 喻文昭, 朱鸿鹄, 王德洋, 谢天铖, 裴华富, 施斌, . 荷载作用下砂土边坡-管道相互作用试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1309-1320.
[15] 柳鸿博, 戴国亮, 周凤玺, 龚志宇, 陈智伟, . 黏弹性非饱和土中劲性复合桩纵向动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1365-1377.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!