岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11): 2993-3002.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0046

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

酸性干湿循环下充填节理岩石劣化性能试验研究

柴少波1, 2,宋浪1,刘欢1,阿比尔的2,柴连增1   

  1. 1. 长安大学 建筑工程学院,陕西 西安 710064;2. 重庆交通大学 水利水运工程教育部重点实验室,重庆 400074
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-10 修回日期:2022-07-13 出版日期:2022-11-11 发布日期:2022-11-29
  • 通讯作者: 宋浪,男,1998年生,硕士研究生,主要从事节理岩石力学特性方面的研究工作。E-mail:songlang0712@163.com E-mail:shbchai@chd.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:柴少波,男,1989年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩石动力学方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 42172302, No. 41902277);水利水运工程教育部重点实验室开放基金资助项目(No. SLK2021A04);西安市科协青年人才托举计划项目(No. 095920201327)。

Experimental study on deterioration characteristics of filled jointed rock under dry-wet cycles in acidic environment

CHAI Shao-bo1, 2, SONG Lang1, LIU Huan1, ABI Erdi2, CHAI Lian-zeng1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Chang’ an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710064, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Hydraulic and Waterway Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
  • Received:2022-01-10 Revised:2022-07-13 Online:2022-11-11 Published:2022-11-29
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42172302, 41902277), the Key Laboratory of Hydraulic and Waterway Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Chongqing Jiaotong University (SLK2021A04) and the Young Talent Promotion Project of Xi 'an Association for Science and Technology (095920201327).

摘要: 为探究酸性干湿循环作用对充填节理岩石的损伤劣化规律,首先对预制充填节理岩石进行酸性和中性环境下不同次数的干湿循环前处理,再采用万能试验机和分离式Hopkinson杆(split Hopkinson pressure bar,简称SHPB)装置对其进行单轴压缩试验和动态冲击试验,对充填节理岩石纵波波速、静态抗压强度以及动态抗压强度的劣化效应进行分析,并进一步分析酸性和中性环境干湿循环作用下充填节理岩石动态冲击的破坏形态。结果表明,随着干湿循环次数的增加,无论是酸性环境还是中性环境,充填节理岩石的波速值、静态抗压强度以及动态抗压强度不断减小,劣化程度不断加剧,其中酸性干湿循环作用对静态抗压强度的劣化最显著;此外发现干湿循环作用下充填节理岩石静态、动态抗压强度与波速值之间均存在一致性较强的线性关系;酸性环境干湿循环作用下充填节理层粉化程度和两侧岩石破碎程度更严重。研究成果可为酸性环境干湿循环作用下工程岩体稳定性分析提供科学依据。

关键词: 充填节理, 酸性环境, 干湿循环, 劣化效应, 动力特性

Abstract: In order to explore the damage characteristics of filled jointed rocks under dry-wet cycles in acidic environment, some experimental studies are carried out in the present study. Firstly, the prefabricated filled jointed rock samples are treated with different number of dry-wet cycles under acidic and neutral environments. Then, the uniaxial compression test and dynamic impact test are carried out by universal testing machine and split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) device. Accordingly, the degradation effects of longitudinal wave velocity, static compressive strength and dynamic compressive strength of the filled jointed rock under the action of dry and wet cycles in acidic and neutral environments are analyzed. The results show that the wave velocity, static compressive strength, and dynamic compressive strength of the filled jointed rock continue to decrease, and the degree of deterioration continues to increase with the increase in the number of wet and dry cycles, whether in acidic or neutral environments. The static compressive strength deteriorates most obviously under acid dry-wet cycling. In addition, it is found that there are linear relationships between the static and dynamic compressive strengths and wave velocity values of the filled jointed rocks subjected to dry-wet cycles; the degree of pulverization of the joint filling layer and the degree of rock fragmentation on both sides are more serious under the dry-wet cycles in acidic environment. The research results can provide a scientific basis for the stability analysis of engineering rock mass under the action of dry-wet cycles in an acidic environment.

Key words: filled rock joint, acidic environment, dry-wet cycle, degradation effect, dynamic compression properties

中图分类号: TU 443
[1] 孟佳佳, 吴益平, 晏鄂川, 汪洋. 基于荷载-干湿循环耦合试验的三峡库区石龙门滑坡滑带土强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1511-1520.
[2] 刘祥宁, 张文杰, . 酸性干湿循环下铬污染土固化体浸出行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1196-1204.
[3] 王桂林, 王力, 王润秋, 任甲山, . 干湿循环后贯通型锯齿状红砂岩节理面剪切本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 706-720.
[4] 薛钦培, 陈宏信, 冯世进, 刘晓轩, 谢伟, . 干湿循环作用下地聚物隔离墙材料渗透特性演化及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 811-820.
[5] 王滢, 刘嘉怡, 高盟, 孔祥霄, . 地震作用下深海含气能源土动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 457-466.
[6] 王杰, 李冲, 刘磊, 丁阔, . 干湿循环下泥岩变形特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3132-3142.
[7] 陈康, 刘先峰, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 马杰, 陈忆涵, . 干湿循环下石灰改良红层泥岩填料力学性能劣化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 43-54.
[8] 任富强, 谷金泽, 孙博, 常远, . 含不同孔洞类岩石材料的动力响应机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 654-664.
[9] 王辉, 钮新强, 马刚, 周伟, . 干湿循环作用下堆石料宏细观力学特性的离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 665-676.
[10] 程家林, 张贵科, 邓韶辉, 黄习文, 周伟, 马刚, . 干湿循环对不同粒径堆石颗粒破碎强度的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 95-105.
[11] 郭建华, 王汉辉, 李世昌, 戴张俊, . 干湿环境下膨胀土裂隙演化规律及渠坡变形研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 433-442.
[12] 隆能增, 任松, 吴斐, 陈征, 陈国庆, 张平, 张闯, . 酸性干湿循环下泥质砂岩劣化及声发射演化特征识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2653-2668.
[13] 王新志, 黄鹏, 雷学文, 文东升, 丁浩桢, 刘铠诚, . 硫酸锌胶结珊瑚砂渗透特性试验及工程应用探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2094-2104.
[14] 李晓照, 车行, 李海峰, 戚承志. 干湿循环脆性岩石直接拉伸断裂的宏细观力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1906-1916.
[15] 黄锋, 米吉龙, 杨永浩, 董广法, 张班, 刘星辰, . 分级动荷载下土石混合体滞回曲线形态特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 674-684.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!