岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7): 1833-1844.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1763

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

盾构隧道环向开挖面破坏机制及剪胀效应研究

张箭1,戚瑞宇1,宗晶瑶2,丰土根1   

  1. 1. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098; 2. 华东建筑设计研究院有限公司上海地下空间与工程设计研究院,上海 200011
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-20 修回日期:2022-03-28 出版日期:2022-07-26 发布日期:2022-08-04
  • 通讯作者: 丰土根,男,1975年生,博士,博士后,教授,从事岩土与地下工程研究。E-mail: fengtugen@hhu.edu.cn E-mail:zhangj0507@h163.com
  • 作者简介:张箭,男,1989年生,博士,博士后,副教授,从事岩土与地下工程研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51808193,No. 52178386);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No. B220202016)。

Failure mechanism of shield tunnel circumferential excavation face and the influence of the dilatancy effect on the tunnel stability

ZHANG Jian1, QI Rui-yu1, ZONG Jing-yao2, FENG Tu-gen1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 2. East China Architecture Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai Underground Space & Engineering Design Institute , Shanghai 200011
  • Received:2021-10-20 Revised:2022-03-28 Online:2022-07-26 Published:2022-08-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (51808193, 52178386), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (B220202016).

摘要:

采用刚性滑块构建两种圆形隧道失稳环向开挖面破坏模式,利用编制的非线性规划程序求解隧道失稳环向开挖面支护力系数σT /cσT为均布支护荷载,c为有效黏聚力)最优上限解及地层破坏模式,揭示地层参数对隧道稳定性的影响,提出简单实用的极限支护力简化公式。研究结果表明:不排水条件下,当隧道埋深比H/DH为埋深,D为隧道直径)和重度系数γD/cγ 为重度)较小时,破坏区域主要集中在隧道中上部,随着H/γD/增大,滑移线起始位置沿着隧道轮廓逐渐向隧道底部扩展,破坏区域向水平方向扩展。排水条件下,地层破坏模式主要有3种。当内摩擦角ϕ γD/较大时,随着剪胀系数的减小,极限支护力和地层破坏范围变化较大,甚至可能引起破坏模式的改变。针对不同深度提出的极限支护力简化公式可快速获得隧道环向开挖面极限支护力。

关键词: 盾构, 刚性滑块法, 破坏模式, 极限支护力, 非关联流动法则

Abstract: Rigid sliding blocks are used to construct two failure modes of the tunnel's circumferential excavation surface of circular tunnel. The compiled nonlinear programming program is used to solve the optimal upper bound solution of the support force coefficient σT /c (σT is uniformly distributed support load and c is the effective cohesion) and the stratum failure mode so as to reveal the influences of stratum parameters on tunnel stability. A simple and practical simplified formula for the ultimate support force of the tunnel's circumferential excavation surface is proposed. For undrained condition, the failure region is mainly concentrated in the upper part of the tunnel when the tunnel depth ratio H/D (H is the buried depth and D is the tunnel diameter) and the gravity coefficient γD/c (γ is unit weight) are small. With the increase of H/D and γD/c, the starting position of the slip line gradually expands to the bottom of the tunnel along the tunnel contour, and the failure region expands to the horizontal direction. For drainage conditions, there are three main stratum failure modes. When the internal friction angle ϕ and γD/c are large, with the decrease of the dilatancy coefficient, the ultimate supporting force increases significantly, and the range of failure region varies greatly, which may even cause a change in the failure mode. The ultimate supporting force of the tunnel circumferential excavation surface can be quickly obtained through the proposed simplified formulas.

Key words: Shield tunnel, Rigid block method, Failure mechanism, Ultimate support force, Non-associated flow rule

中图分类号: U 451
[1] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[2] 宋利埼, 章敏, 徐筱, 孙静雯, 俞奎, 李昕尧, . 考虑管片接头转动效应的盾构隧道光纤反演分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2483-2494.
[3] 宋牧原, 杨明辉, 陈伟, 卢贤锥, . 基于自注意力-循环神经网络模型的盾构引发的土体沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2613-2625.
[4] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[5] 刘健, 夏勇, 江权, 陈涛, 贺维国, 范国刚, 熊先涛, 郑虹, . 强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[6] 储超群, 包兴佳, 毛明发, 吴顺川, 崔贺佳, . 深地灰岩三轴压缩声发射特征及破坏形式试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2049-2061.
[7] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[8] 汪昕, 幸安康, 曾子强, 姜祎, 徐建宇, 王晓南, 刘造保, . 层理铁矿石剪切力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1039-1048.
[9] 杨柳, 杨铎, 何满潮, . 基于纳米划痕的陆相页岩纹层界面过渡区分布范围定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 353-367.
[10] 黄明华, 钟煜轩, 陆锦斌, 王克平. 基于非连续地基梁模型的基坑开挖诱发下卧盾构隧道变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 492-504.
[11] 谢立夫, 关振长, 黄明, 丘华生, 许超. 考虑主动铰接的盾构-地层相互作用模型及求解研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3574-3584.
[12] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 廖清香, 李爽, 段岳强. 基于时序聚类和在线学习的盾构掘进地层智能识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[13] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[14] 雷华阳, 杨洋, 许英刚. 不同埋深条件下盾构施工扰动试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 1-12.
[15] 范浩, 王磊, 罗勇, 朱传奇, . 卸荷损伤砂岩的分级加载三轴蠕变力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 277-288.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!