岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8): 2176-2190.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.2108

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

邻近车站(工作井)基坑开挖对下卧 盾构隧道影响的解析计算方法

王祖贤1,施成华1,龚琛杰1,曹成勇2,刘建文1,彭铸1   

  1. 1. 中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410075;2. 深圳大学 土木与交通工程学院,广东 深圳 518060
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-28 修回日期:2022-06-24 出版日期:2022-08-11 发布日期:2022-08-17
  • 通讯作者: 龚琛杰,男,1990年生,博士,副教授,主要从事盾构隧道结构安全方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail: gongcj@csu.edu.cn E-mail:csusdwzx@csu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王祖贤,男,1994年生,博士研究生,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51908557,No. 51778636);湖南省自然科学基金(No. 2021JJ30837)。

Analytical method to estimate the influence of foundation pit excavation adjacent to the station (working shaft) on the underlying shield tunnel

WANG Zu-xian1, SHI Cheng-hua1, GONG Chen-jie1, CAO Cheng-yong2, LIU Jian-wen1, PENG Zhu1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 2. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518060, China
  • Received:2021-11-28 Revised:2022-06-24 Online:2022-08-11 Published:2022-08-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51908557, 51778636) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2021JJ30837).

摘要:

既有用于基坑开挖引起下卧盾构隧道纵向变形计算的解析模型,往往将盾构隧道视为两端自由的无限长梁,限制了此类模型的适用范围。针对邻近车站(工作井)基坑开挖引起下卧盾构隧道纵向变形问题,将车站(工作井)―隧道连接节点对盾构隧道的约束视为一转动刚度为 Kθ 的旋转弹簧和一竖向链杆,建立了开挖卸荷作用下邻近车站(工作井)盾构隧道纵向变形分析的Winkler地基 - Timoshenko 梁模型,基于力法基本原理严格推导了解析模型的差分解。通过与一维弹性地基梁有限元数值解和邻近车站基坑开挖诱发下卧盾构隧道纵向变形的整体有限元计算结果的对比,验证了解析模型的可靠性和适用性。进一步的参数分析结果表明:车站(工作井)―隧道连接节点转动刚度 Kθ 对隧道纵向变形和内力具有显著影响,连接端处隧道内力随 Kθ的增大而非线性增大,而隧道横截面转角的变化却恰好相反,且车站(工作井)-隧道连接节点采用柔性连接时能更好地保障此节点处盾构隧道的工作性能;当基坑中心距车站-隧道连接节点的距离在4~5倍的基坑宽度(沿隧道轴向)范围内时,连接节点对隧道端部的约束效应不可忽略,应采用该模型进行盾构隧道纵向性能评价;上覆基坑开挖对下卧盾构隧道的影响主要集中在自基坑中心2倍基坑长度(横隧道轴向)以内。

关键词: 盾构隧道, 基坑开挖, 柔性边界, 纵向变形, 解析解

Abstract:

The shield tunnel is typically simplified as an infinite beam with two free ends in existing analytical models, which are used to calculate the longitudinal deformation of the underlying shield tunnel induced by the excavation of a foundation pit. However, the applicability of those analytical models is limited due to the simplification. The current study is aimed at estimating analytically the longitudinal deformation of the underlying shield tunnel induced by the excavation of a foundation pit adjacent to the station (working shaft). The constraint on the shield tunnel generated by the joint between the station (working shaft) and the tunnel is treated as a rotation spring with the rotation stiffness of  Kθ  and a vertical rod support. The Winkler foundation – Timoshenko beam model for calculating the longitudinal deformation of the shield tunnel adjacent to the station (working shaft) induced by the foundation pit excavation is proposed. The finite difference solution of the proposed model is strictly derived based on the basic principles of the force method. The reliability and applicability of the proposed analytical model are verified via the comparison with the finite element numerical solution of one-dimensional elastic foundation beam model and the global finite element simulation results of the longitudinal deformation of the underlying tunnel induced by the excavation of a foundation pit adjacent to the station. The parametric studies indicate the following conclusions. (i) The longitudinal deformation and internal forces of the shield tunnel are significantly influenced by the rotation stiffness, Kθ , of the joint between the station (working shaft) and the tunnel. The internal forces and the longitudinal deformation (i.e. rotation angle) at the end of the tunnel increase and decreases nonlinearly with a increasing  Kθ , respectively. In addition, when the flexible connection is adopted at the joint between the station (working well) and tunnel, the working performance of the shield tunnel at the joint can be better guaranteed. (ii) The constraint effect of the joint on the end of the tunnel is non-negligible, when the distance from the center of the foundation pit to the station-tunnel joint ranges from 4 to 5 times the width of the pit along the tunnel axis. In this condition, the proposed analytical model should be adopted to evaluate the longitudinal working performance of the tunnel. (iii) The influence of the overlying foundation pit excavation on the underlying tunnel mainly exerts within 2 times the length of the pit perpendicular to the tunnel axis away from the center of the pit.

Key words: shield tunnel, foundation pit excavation, flexible boundary, longitudinal deformation, analytical solution

中图分类号: TU 43
[1] 冉龙洲, 袁松, 王希宝, 张廷彪, 刘德军, 黎良仆, . 考虑围岩−盾体−注浆体−管片相互作用的深埋护盾式隧道掘进机法隧道围岩压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 366-376.
[2] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[3] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[4] 宋利埼, 章敏, 徐筱, 孙静雯, 俞奎, 李昕尧, . 考虑管片接头转动效应的盾构隧道光纤反演分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2483-2494.
[5] 宋牧原, 杨明辉, 陈伟, 卢贤锥, . 基于自注意力-循环神经网络模型的盾构引发的土体沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2613-2625.
[6] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[7] 周航, 汪义圣, 亓戈平, . 黏弹性土中异形桩横向动力响应半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 761-774.
[8] 任连伟, 王书彪, 孔纲强, 杨权威, 邓岳保. 综合管廊始发井能源支护桩热力响应现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 573-581.
[9] 黄明华, 钟煜轩, 陆锦斌, 王克平. 基于非连续地基梁模型的基坑开挖诱发下卧盾构隧道变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 492-504.
[10] 王浩, 侯泓冰, 江文豪, . 考虑根系对水文特性影响下非饱和植被土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3329-3345.
[11] 张智卿, 刘鑫, 刘开富, 吴君涛, 吴文兵, . 横观各向同性土体中端承桩水平振动特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3371-3382.
[12] 谢立夫, 关振长, 黄明, 丘华生, 许超. 考虑主动铰接的盾构-地层相互作用模型及求解研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3574-3584.
[13] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 廖清香, 李爽, 段岳强. 基于时序聚类和在线学习的盾构掘进地层智能识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[14] 黄大维, 刘家璇, 谭满生, 邓翔浩, 黄永亮, 翁友华, 陈升平, . 盾构隧道底部注浆抬升模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 371-381.
[15] 王小刚, 杨建平, 陈卫忠, 李慧, . 盾构隧道结构响应特征及接缝刚度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 485-495.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!