岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S1): 127-144.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1708

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

土中有效应力概念的起源与发展

曾立峰1, 2,邵龙潭1, 2,郭晓霞1, 2   

  1. 1. 大连理工大学 工业装备结构分析国家重点实验室,辽宁 大连 116024;2. 大连理工大学 工程力学系,辽宁 大连 116024
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-11 修回日期:2022-03-07 出版日期:2022-06-30 发布日期:2022-07-13
  • 通讯作者: 邵龙潭,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事土和孔隙介质力学基本理论研究、土工结构稳定分析、土工试验测试技术与仪器研发等方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail: shaolt@dlut.edu.cn E-mail:zenglifeng34@163.com
  • 作者简介:曾立峰,男,1986年生,博士研究生,主要从事非饱和土力学方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.52079018,No.51479023)。

Origin and development of the concept of effective stress for soils

ZENG Li-feng1, 2, SHAO Long-tan1, 2, GUO Xiao-xia1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China; 2. Department of Engineering Mechanics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China
  • Received:2021-10-11 Revised:2022-03-07 Online:2022-06-30 Published:2022-07-13
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(52079018, 51479023).

摘要: Terzaghi于1922年提出的有效应力概念是土力学的基石性概念,其历史迄今已有百年。值此百年之际,有必要对有效应力的概念起源、物理意义、方程形式及其力学作用进行总结和分析。可知饱和土Terzaghi有效应力方程已得到了广泛的认同,而非饱和土Bishop型有效应力方程的具体形式尚未统一。有效应力方程中应力变量的物理意义仍未形成共识。通过进一步的分析,认为存在于土骨架上的应力可以分为3类,第1类是由总应力引起的沿土骨架传递的应力,即有效应力;第2类是由孔隙流体压强引起的作用在土颗粒横截面上和土颗粒间接触面上的应力,它们不沿土骨架传递;第3类是由范德华引力、双电层斥力、收缩膜表面张力(对非饱和土而言)和胶结物作用引起的颗粒间局部应力,它们也不沿土骨架传递。因此,这3类应力对土体抗剪强度和体变的贡献应分别考虑。

关键词: 有效应力, 饱和土, 非饱和土, 中性应力, 抗剪强度

Abstract: The concept of effective stress proposed by Terzaghi in 1922 is a cornerstone concept in soil mechanics, and its history has been a hundred years so far. On the occasion of the centenary of the birth of effective stress, it is worth summarizing and analyzing the origin, the physical meaning, the expression, and the mechanical effect of effective stress. The summary and analysis show that Terzaghi’s effective stress equation for saturated soil has been widely recognized, whereas the specific expressions for the Bishop-type effective stress equation for unsaturated soil have not been unified. The physical meanings of the stress variables in the effective stress equations for saturated and unsaturated soils have still been explained by different ways. Through further analysis, we find that the stresses existing on the soil skeleton can be divided into three types: the first one is the stress transmitted through the soil skeleton caused by the total stress, i.e., the effective stress; the second one is the stresses acting on the cross-section of soil particles and on the contact between soil particles induced by the pore fluid pressure, which are not transmitted through the soil skeleton; and the third one is the local stresses acting on the contact between soil particles induced by the van der Waals forces, diffuse double-layer forces, surface tension of water, and cementation forces, which are also not transmitted through the soil skeleton. Therefore, the contributions of these three types of stresses to the shear strength and volumetric strain of soils should be separately quantified.

Key words: effective stress, saturated soil, unsaturated soil, neutral stress, shear strength

中图分类号: TU43
[1] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[2] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[3] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[4] 张振光, 徐杰, 范家燊, . 不排水条件下非饱和土球孔扩张的塑性新解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1988-1996.
[5] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[6] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[7] 张天军, 田嘉伟, 张磊, 庞明坤, 潘红宇, 孟伟, 贺绥男, . 循环载荷下破碎煤体渗透率及迂曲度演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1409-1418.
[8] 杨景泉, 郑长杰, 丁选明, . 竖向入射P波激励下饱和土中管桩地震响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1477-1488.
[9] 尚召伟, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 王斐, 黎澄生, . 非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性与其持水特征曲线确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1131-1140.
[10] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[11] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[12] 张振光, 徐杰, 李海祥, . 考虑中间主应力的非饱和土竖井主动土压力滑移线解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3045-3053.
[13] 王军, 张凯宇, 陈晟凯, 秦伟, 倪俊峰, 高紫阳, 张一帆, . 爆破挤淤法中炸药埋深对土体参数影响的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 123-132.
[14] 张化进, 吴顺川, 李兵磊, 赵宇松, . 基于高斯过程回归的岩石抗剪强度参数不确定性估测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 415-423.
[15] 朱俊宇, 裴利华, 桂跃, . 含有机质土抗剪强度再认识——基于土壤有机质赋存形态的认知[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 451-460.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!