岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 381-391.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0186

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

斜坡桩水平循环特性模型试验及有限杆单元解

彭文哲1, 2,赵明华1, 2,杨超炜1, 2,赵衡1, 2   

  1. 1. 湖南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410082;2. 湖南大学 建筑安全与节能教育部重点实验室,湖南 长沙 410082
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-18 接受日期:2022-05-01 出版日期:2023-02-10 发布日期:2023-02-17
  • 通讯作者: 杨超炜,男,1988年生,博士,工程师,主要从事桩基础方面的研究。E-mail: cwyang@hnu.edu.cn E-mail:wzpeng@hnu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:彭文哲,男,1993年生,博士(后),主要从事桩基础方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52108317, No. 51908208)

Model test and finite beam element solution of cyclic lateral characteristics of piles in sloping ground

PENG Wen-zhe1, 2, ZHAO Ming-hua1, 2, YANG Chao-wei1, 2, ZHAO Heng1, 2   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Building Safety and Energy Efficiency of the Ministry of Education, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China
  • Received:2022-02-18 Accepted:2022-05-01 Online:2023-02-10 Published:2023-02-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(52108317, 51908208).

摘要: 为了揭示斜坡效应和循环弱化效应共同影响下的斜坡桩水平循环特性,进行了不同循环次数、荷载幅值及坡度下的单向水平循环加载试验,并将水平静载试验作为对照,揭示了桩顶位移、桩身弯矩及地基反力等变化规律。综合考虑二阶效应及桩-土相互作用的影响,对单元刚度矩阵进行了改进,提出了有限杆单元解。将理论预测曲线等与实测曲线及幂级数法计算结果进行了对比,验证了有限杆单元解的合理性。结果表明:桩身弯矩及位移均随循环次数非线性增加,最大弯矩位置逐渐从无量纲深度za=1.25下移到za=1.75;桩顶无量纲位移0,a与循环次数n之间的关系符合幂函数y0,a=An0.11;当荷载幅值由20 N增加到40 N时,最大无量纲弯矩由0.010增加到0.029,位置均保持在za=1.7附近;当坡度由30°增加到60°时,最大无量纲弯矩由0.011(za=1)增加到0.025(za=2.5)

关键词: 桥梁工程, 桩基础, 水平循环特性, 模型试验, 斜坡效应, 有限杆单元法

Abstract:

To reveal the cyclic lateral characteristics of piles in sloping ground under the combined influence of slope effect and cyclic weakening effect, one-way cyclic lateral loading tests with different cycle numbers, load amplitudes and slope angles were carried out, and corresponding lateral static loading tests were conducted as a comparison. The variation trends of pile head deflection, bending moment and subgrade reaction were revealed. Then, the element stiffness matrix was improved by considering the second-order effect and pile-soil interaction to develop the finite beam element solution. Finally, the theoretical predicted curves were compared with measured curves and results calculated by the power series method to validate the finite beam element solution. The results show that the bending moments and pile deflections nonlinearly increase with cycle numbers, and the location of maximum bending moments gradually drops downwards from the non-dimensional depth za=1.25 to za=1.75. The relationship between the non-dimensional deflection y0,a atop the pile and cycle number n satisfies the power function 0,aAn 0.11. When the load amplitude increases from 20 N to 40 N, the maximum non-dimensional bending moment increases from 0.010 to 0.029, but their locations remain near z=1.7. When the slope angle increases from 30° to 60°, the maximum non-dimensional bending moment increases from 0.011 (z=1) to 0.025 (z=2.5).

Key words: bridge engineering, pile foundation, cyclic lateral characteristics, model test, slope effect, finite beam element method

中图分类号: U 473.1
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[6] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[7] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[8] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[9] 杨明辉, 蔡明辉, 陈波, 杨汉, . 考虑波致海床动态响应的单桩水平阻抗计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1563-1572.
[10] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[11] 周光远, 干飞, 郑刚, 周海祚, 王宏, 毕靖, 刘彪, 张元胤, . 基于土体变形的端承桩负摩阻力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 930-942.
[12] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[13] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[14] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[15] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!