岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 717-727.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0498

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

顶板−支护系统准共振诱发冲击地压机制研究

王凯兴1，薛佳琪1，潘一山1，窦林名2，肖永惠3   

  1. 1. 辽宁工程技术大学 力学与工程学院，辽宁 阜新 123000；2. 中国矿业大学 深部煤炭资源开采教育部重点实验室，江苏 徐州 221116； 3. 辽宁大学 物理学院，辽宁 沈阳 110036
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-12 接受日期:2022-08-29 出版日期:2023-03-21 发布日期:2023-03-24
  • 作者简介:王凯兴，男，1984年生，博士，副教授，主要从事岩石动力学与矿山灾害力学方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金（No.51874163）；辽宁省“兴辽英才计划”项目资助（No.XLYC2007021）

Study on the mechanism of coal bursts induced by quasi-resonance of roof-support system

WANG Kai-xing1, XUE Jia-qi1, PAN Yi-shan1, DOU Lin-ming2, XIAO Yong-hui3   

  1. 1. School of Mechanics and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, Liaoning 123000, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Deep Coal Resource Mining of Ministry of Education, China University of Mining Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 3. School of Physics, Liaoning University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110036, China
  • Received:2022-04-12 Accepted:2022-08-29 Online:2023-03-21 Published:2023-03-24
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51874163) and Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program (XLYC2007021).

PDF (Chinese)

167

PDF (English)

7

摘要： 冲击地压的发生机制与防治是煤矿动力灾害研究的重要问题。巷道顶板−支护系统在围岩扰动作用下存在接近共振状态的准共振现象将诱发顶板支护系统的冲击灾害，表现为顶板的位移、速度、加速度3种准共振强响应。依据支护失稳及支护塑性屈曲判别条件，给出支护动载破坏的3个安全系数及相应的危险扰动频率比区间，同时针对顶板支护系统准共振诱发的冲击灾害给出支护阻尼防冲控制分析。结果表明：在外界扰动力幅值低于静载下的支护临界破坏载荷时，顶板−支护系统的准共振现象是导致支护冲击破坏的主要原因；支护破坏的准共振危险扰动频率比区间与顶板支护系统的阻尼比及力幅比有关，随着阻尼比的增加，顶板准共振时的位移、速度及加速度响应幅值均减小，支护阻尼是对3种准共振响应均敏感的控制量；随着顶板支护系统阻尼比的增大或力幅比（外界扰动力幅值与支护静载破坏临界载荷之比）的下降，支护的危险扰动频率比区间范围将缩小甚至消失，同时阻尼比和力幅比取值均较小时，顶板支护系统在3种准共振下的危险扰动频率比取值区间较为接近。该研究将丰富对冲击地压发生机制的认识，同时对支护防冲控制设计具有参考价值。

关键词: 冲击地压, 顶板?支护系统准共振, 支护破坏, 防冲控制

Abstract: The mechanism and prevention of coal burst is an important issue in the study of coal mine dynamic disasters. The disturbance of surrounding rocks can trigger the quasi-resonance phenomena of roadway roof support system in close proximity to its resonant state, ultimately inducing impact disasters. This is manifested in three strong quasi-resonant responses, including roof displacement, velocity and acceleration. Based on the support instability and plastic buckling criteria, three safety factors and the corresponding dangerous disturbance frequency ratio interval for the dynamic failure of support are proposed, and the support damping control strategy is given, aiming at the impact disasters induced by the quasi-resonance of the roof support system. The results show that when the amplitude of disturbing force is lower than the critical failure force of the support under static loads, the quasi-resonant phenomena of roof support system is the main reason for the dynamic failure of support. The frequency ratio range of quasi-resonant dangerous disturbance for support failure is related to the damping ratio and force amplitude ratio of roof support system. With the increasing damping ratio, the displacement, velocity and acceleration response amplitudes at the roof quasi-resonance will decrease. The support damping is a controlling factor sensitive to these three types of quasi-resonant responses. When the damping ratio in the roof support system increases or the force amplitude ratio (the ratio between the amplitude of external disturbance and the critical load for static support failure) decreases, the dangerous disturbance frequency ratio interval of the support will narrow or even disappear. When the damping ratio and force amplitude ratio are small, the dangerous disturbance frequency ratio intervals of the roof support system under three quasi-resonant conditions are close. This study will enrich the understanding of the mechanism behind coal bursts and provide valuable insights for the design of support control.

Key words: coal bursts, quasi-resonance of roof-support system, support failure, control of preventing coal burst

中图分类号: TD353
[1] 谭健, 刘学生, 耿艳峰, 付彪, 王洪磊, 许珂, . 防冲钻机钻测智能化试验平台研制及初步应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 673-684.
[2] 徐东, 高明仕, 郑锐, . 同采工作面厚硬顶板破断诱冲机制及防控技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3219-3233.
[3] 高明仕, 俞鑫, 徐东, 贺永亮, 赵世帆, . 基于冲能吸能平衡效应的冲击地压巷道分级支护研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 38-48.
[4] 王书文, 鞠文君, 张春会, 苏士杰, 陆闯, . 弹脆性圆形煤巷应力跃升及冲击地压预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 873-883.
[5] 陈光波, 张俊文, 贺永亮, 张国华, 李谭, . 煤岩组合体峰前能量分布公式推导及试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 130-143.
[6] 杨 科, 刘文杰, 马衍坤, 许日杰, 池小楼, . 真三轴单面临空下煤岩组合体冲击 破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 15-27.
[7] 吴振华, 潘鹏志, 潘俊锋, 王兆丰, 高家明. 地堑构造区冲击地压发生机制及矿震活动规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2225-2238.
[8] 王爱文, 高乾书, 潘一山, . 煤层钻孔降倾-控变-耗能防冲机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1230-1244.
[9] 姚精明, 许自文, 王建, 王路. 锚杆−泡沫铝联合支护防治冲击地压试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 620-626.
[10] 陈光波, 秦忠诚, 张国华, 李谭, 李敬凯, . 受载煤岩组合体破坏前能量分布规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2021-2033.
[11] 王凯兴, 窦林名, 潘一山, OPARIN V N . 块系岩体非协调动力响应特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1227-1234.
[12] 王 岗, 潘一山, 肖晓春, . 单轴加载煤体破坏特征与电荷规律研究及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1823-1831.
[13] 朱斯陶, 姜福兴, 朱海洲, 张俊杰, 连鸿全, 韩国庆, . 高应力区掘进工作面冲击地压事故发生机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 337-343.
[14] 潘俊锋，夏永学，冯美华，秦子晗. 影响冲击地压危险性评价结果的II类开采技术因素研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 367-373.
[15] 肖晓春，丁 鑫，赵 鑫，潘一山，王爱文，王 磊，. 加载速率影响的煤体破裂过程声-电荷试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3419-3426.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发