岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 941-951.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0721

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

盾构下穿高铁路基变形规律模型试验研究

刘勇1, 2,周怡晟1,索晓明3,樊浩博1, 2,曹毅泽1,杜志田3   

  1. 1. 石家庄铁道大学 土木工程学院,河北 石家庄 050043;2. 石家庄铁道大学 道路与铁道工程安全保障省部共建教育部重点实验室, 河北 石家庄 050043;3. 中国铁路设计集团有限公司,天津 300308
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-16 接受日期:2022-09-22 出版日期:2023-04-18 发布日期:2023-04-27
  • 通讯作者: 樊浩博,男,1989年生,博士,讲师,主要从事富水隧道衬砌水压力及结构病害方面的研究。E-mail: fanhb@stdu.edu.cn E-mail:1366050542@qq.com
  • 作者简介:刘勇,男,1970年生,博士,教授,主要从事隧道及地下工程施工稳定性方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国铁集团重点课题(No.N2020G009);国家自然科学基金青年基金(No.52108378);青年人才托举工程(No.2021QNRC001)。

Model test on the deformation law of shield tunnel underpassing high speed railway roadbed

LIU Yong1, 2, ZHOU Yi-sheng1, SUO Xiao-ming3, FAN Hao-bo1, 2, CAO Yi-ze1, DU Zhi-tian3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Roads and Railway Engineering Safety Control of Ministry of Education, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 3. China Railway Design Corporation, Tianjin 300308, China
  • Received:2022-05-16 Accepted:2022-09-22 Online:2023-04-18 Published:2023-04-27
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Project of China Railway (N2020G009), the National Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China (52108378) and the Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST (2021QNRC001).

摘要: 为了探究盾构下穿施工对高铁路基U型槽结构和地层的变形影响规律,以拟建的石家庄市轨道交通4号线下穿京石高速铁路路基为工程背景,基于几何相似比配制了地层和结构模型试验材料,设计了试验监测系统,采用1 200 mm小型盾构机进行了盾构隧洞顶距路基管桩底不同距离的2组室内模型试验。结果表明:随着距离盾构隧道拱顶距离的增大,地层沉降减小,盾构施工对地层的影响范围约为2倍洞径,显著影响区为1倍洞径;随着埋深的增大,盾构施工引起结构下方地层的沉降减小,距盾构隧道顶距离分别为0.5倍洞径和1倍洞径时沉降最大差值为10%;U型槽结构与相邻地层间产生脱空,盾尾脱出阶段发生的地层沉降占比大于74%。建议管片拼装完成后采用保水性好且有一定早期强度的注浆填充材料,以控制沉降变形,同时进行地层深孔注浆,及时充填松动地层孔隙,增加地层密实度。

关键词: 盾构隧道, 下穿高铁路基, 地层变形, 模型试验

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of shield underpass construction on the deformation of the U-shaped trough structure and stratum of the high speed railway roadbed. The proposed Shijiazhuang rail transit line No.4 underpassing the Beijing-Shijiazhuang high-speed railway roadbed is selected as the engineering background. The stratum and structural model test materials are formulated based on the geometric similarity ratio, and the test monitoring system is designed. A 1 200 mm small shield is employed to carry out 2 sets of laboratory model tests for different distances from the vault of the shield tunnel to the bottom of pile in the roadbed. The results show that: with the increase of the distance from the shield tunnel vault, the settlement of the strata decreases, the influence range of the shield construction on the strata is about 2 times of the diameter of the tunnel, and the significant influence range is one time of the diameter of the tunnel; with the increase of the burial depth, the settlement of the strata under the structure caused by the shield construction decreases, and the maximum difference of settlement is 10% at the distance of 0.5 and 1.0 times of the diameter of the tunnel respectively from the shield tunnel vault; a dehiscence occurs between the U-shaped trough and the adjacent strata, and the percentage of settlement of the strata occurring during the shield tail release phase is greater than 74%. It is recommended to use grout filling material with good water retention and certain early strength after the completion of segment assembly to control the settlement deformation. Meanwhile, deep hole grouting should be carried out to timely fill loose ground pores so as to increase the compactness.

Key words: shield tunnel, underpassing high speed rail roadbed, stratigraphic deformation, model test

中图分类号: TU475
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋利埼, 章敏, 徐筱, 孙静雯, 俞奎, 李昕尧, . 考虑管片接头转动效应的盾构隧道光纤反演分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2483-2494.
[4] 宋牧原, 杨明辉, 陈伟, 卢贤锥, . 基于自注意力-循环神经网络模型的盾构引发的土体沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2613-2625.
[5] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[6] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[7] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[8] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[9] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[10] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[11] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[12] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[13] 黄明华, 钟煜轩, 陆锦斌, 王克平. 基于非连续地基梁模型的基坑开挖诱发下卧盾构隧道变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 492-504.
[14] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[15] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!